If you don t buy a parking space, you are not allowed to enter the community, and then the owner hit

In this case, it should be damage to public property and compensation should be awarded. Of course, the owner did not buy a parking space, the community does not let in, there is also a certain responsibility, indicating that the management of the community is not comprehensive, to deal with the specific situation of the community, of course, the owner should negotiate with the community property to solve, should not do uncivilized things.

It is considered to destroy public property, and the property of the public collective cannot be destroyed because of personal matters.

If you don't buy a parking space, you are not allowed to enter the community, and then the owner hits the bar, which is considered to be a damage to the public finances, and it is good to repair it or buy a new one to restore the bar.

The owner does not have to buy a parking space, in fact, the parking space should be shared by all the owners, not bought and sold.

Legal analysis: It is illegal to not buy a parking space and not give up the community, which violates the rights of the owner. Because there are generally public parking spaces in the community, the ownership of the public parking spaces is shared by all owners, and it does not have the nature of sale and transfer.

The owners of the community have the right to drive their vehicles into the community, and can park and occupy the parking spaces on the roads or other sites shared by the owners for parking cars. Therefore, it is illegal not to buy parking spaces and not to allow cars to enter the community, and the property does not allow cars to enter and exit the community, and the owner can complain to the local housing and urban-rural development bureau according to the specific situation.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 275: Within building zoning, the ownership of parking spaces and garages planned for parking cars is to be agreed upon by the parties through means such as **, gifts, or leases. Parking spaces that occupy roads or other sites jointly owned by the owners for parking cars belong to the owners in common.

Article 276: Within building zoning, parking spaces and garages planned for parking cars shall first meet the needs of the owners.

Because there are no laws and regulations that stipulate that a natural person cannot buy so many parking spaces at once, his operation is indeed legal and compliant, that is, it is not an illegal and criminal act, but whether it is reasonable or not, this is a moral category, and it should have its own point of view, and it should be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

The community sells parking spaces in a package, and an owner buys 753 parking spaces, which is unreasonable and illegal, seriously damages the interests of the owners, and will have a great impact on the harmony and stability of the community.

The community packaged and sold parking spaces, and an owner bought 753 parking spaces and was questioned, and the property said that it was legal and compliant, is this operation reasonable? As an owner, you have the right to buy parking spaces, and if you sell them in a package, it may cause unreasonable resource allocation. Some owners don't have a parking space and need to buy from him.

While legally compliant, it is unreasonable.

Unreasonable, he has the money to buy 753 parking spaces, as the owner of the parking space, take profits from it, the property also claims to be legal and compliant, I personally feel that the two sides have hidden feelings, this operation is absolutely unreasonable, as a member of the community, can be above.

The community sells parking spaces in a package, and the owner bought 753 parking spaces to make people question. Although the property is legal and compliant, it will cause great inconvenience to the owners. There are so many parking spaces, there is one owner to buy, and other owners can't buy it if they want to, so there will be a contradiction.

I don't think that's reasonable.

Is the parking space in the community above ground or underground? If it is on the ground, his ** parking space is unreasonable, because the area on the ground belongs to the owner's share, and the area does not belong to the property. He has no right to sell, if the underground parking space community sells more than 700 owners, I think this is also unreasonable, because the parking space is 1 + 1 households, you can allocate it to the owner and feel that it is convenient for you to sell a person, then the other owners are inconvenient, you want to rent a parking space from the owner's hands, he must be expensive, so this phenomenon is definitely not.

It's not reasonable or legal.

This kind of operation is unreasonable.

First of all, the parking spaces in the community cannot be packaged for sale, because the parking spaces in the community are set up for the owners and should be used by the owners.

An owner bought 753 parking spaces, obviously not for his own use, then, the property dumped this parking space as a project to the owner, let the owner to carry out secondary sales or leasing, from the property side, is also inappropriate. A car is only a parking space, at most according to the number of parking spaces owned by the family, a property owner buys so much, it is objectively occupying the rights and interests of other owners, and taking the rights of others for their own is a serious violation of the private interests of others.

If the community sells parking spaces in a package, it is reasonable for one owner to buy so many parking spaces, because when other owners don't want it, when the owner buys the parking space, the ownership must belong to her, and in the law, it is reasonable and compliant.

The real estate development enterprise project parking spaces and supporting commercial houses shall go through the current sale procedures in stages, and the real estate development enterprise shall publicize the parking space sales information and situation in a prominent position in the location of the project for three months, and cannot sell all of them, for the remaining parking spaces. Buyers of the project can choose to purchase multiple parking spaces at their own discretion. As a property owner, you have the right to buy parking spaces, and if you sell them in a package, it may cause unreasonable resource allocation.

It's legal, but it's unreasonable.

I think this practice should be illegal and compliant, because if one owner buys 753 parking spaces, then other owners can't buy them, and the key is that he won't have so many cars.

Irrationality. The owners of the community have the right of first refusal to choose the parking space, and after the owner does not give up the right of first refusal, he sells it in a package, which violates the owner's right of first refusal. At the same time, the owner of the purchase must be packaged and sold, which infringes on the economic interests of other owners, and other owners can sue to protect their legitimate rights and interests.

Legal compliance is not "greasy".

In an interview, Ms. Wu, the contact of the sales team of more than 700 parking space buyers, said that their parking spaces officially went on sale on September 8, and many owners came to consult and register their purchases. Their parking spaces are currently only considered for sale, not for rent.

Ms. Wu admitted that their boss bought so many parking spaces for investment, and everything was legal and compliant, and there was no "cat greasy". Their parking spaces are even cheaper than those sold by real estate developers, but she can't guarantee whether they will rise in the future.

This operation is unreasonable and an abuse of public resources.

The community packs and sells parking spaces. This is not in accordance with the regulations. Because. Doing so in the community will damage the interests of other residents, and others will not be able to buy a parking space, so they can only rent this person's parking space. This is an irrational behavior. You can call 12345 to report him.

I feel that the practice of the community is legal and compliant, because there is no sale of this parking space in the early stage, and then it is invested by others, which is a relatively normal phenomenon.

I think it is unreasonable for the community to package and sell parking spaces, as an owner, everyone has the right to buy parking spaces, and an owner who buys 753 parking spaces will lead to a lot of owners having no parking spaces. Although the property was once legally compliant, this operation is certainly unreasonable.

According to the rules of the market economy, this practice is legal and compliant, and it is also relatively reasonable. Because the community sells parking spaces in a package, the owner can buy one or more than one.

The community packs and sells parking spaces. One owner bought 753 parking spaces and was questioned. The property says it is legal and compliant. This should be unreasonable, if other owners buy it again, they have to buy from him, and he can't sell it at the original price. And it will increase the price, which is unfair to other owners.

The phenomenon of owners buying all parking spaces is an individual right, but there are no relevant laws and policies to manage it, and their purpose is relatively simple, that is, profit has damaged the rights of the majority of owners and needs to be stopped.

It can only show that the owner of the car is rich and capricious, and we can't control it, there is really no way, like our ordinary family, a parking space is thin enough, and people buy hundreds at once. This is also something that we can't envy.

It must be unreasonable, because a person who buys so many parking spaces must be to make money, because now there are more and more cars, parking is very difficult, and he can make money by relying on temporary parking and taxi spaces.

1 All I guess you must have bought a parking space and scratched someone else's car (parked on the side of the road), and you are also likely to be a woman and want to find a reason to benefit yourself.

According to road traffic regulations, if you have a scrape accident while driving and a stationary vehicle, you will be fully responsible for the accident because it is the cause of the scrape accident. Even if the traffic police came, they were punished like this. If the other party parks illegally, the traffic police will also punish him, but it will not reduce your responsibility.

If you have an accident in the community, then the traffic police will not punish the other party, and will let the property handle the matter.

If the space after parking is not enough for other vehicles to pass, then the property will advise and help you reduce, if the reserved space after parking is enough for other vehicles to pass, then the property will not be managed (generally when the parking space in the community is not enough, the owner will park on the side of the road, and it is agreed by the property). It only means that your car is driving too badly (sooner or later it will be scraped, just to see who catches up).

Obstructing passage and scraping are two different things.

Obstruction of traffic is a moral or character issue of the car owner. You can move it or by other means.

Scratching is a problem of driving skills. If you can't get by, then it's a scrape.

It is clear that the property supervision is not in place. If the car is not in place, it will definitely hinder the passage.