How to understand the phrase those who have knowledge do not necessarily have culture .

This sentence can be understood as: in the traditional sense, a person has or does not have culture, which refers to the level of education he has received. Therefore, people generally think that people with knowledge will have culture.

And this culture really depends on the level of education he has received, and it is a culture in a relatively narrow sense. Culture in a broad sense also includes culture other than book knowledge, such as a person's moral cultivation and living habits, etc., which belong to culture in a broad sense, which generally has little to do with people's knowledge level, and many of them are gradually formed by the congenital and acquired living environment. Therefore, it is said that "those who have knowledge do not necessarily have culture".

The meaning of this sentence is that although a person may possess a wealth of knowledge, he or she may lack cultural attainment and humanistic qualities.

Culture is a broader concept that includes not only knowledge, but also a person's values, morals, aesthetics, social skills, artistic accomplishments, and other aspects. Therefore, even if a person has a lot of knowledge, if he or she lacks cultural attainment and humanistic qualities, then he or she may still not have real culture.

In addition, there is sometimes too much emphasis on the importance of knowledge and neglect the value of other aspects of culture. For example, a person may have a lot of knowledge about art and culture, but if he or she does not have the ability to appreciate and understand art, then he or she cannot be considered a literate person either.

Therefore, people with knowledge do not necessarily have culture, and this sentence reminds us to look at the concept of culture holistically, not only to value, but also to pay attention to personal humanistic qualities and cultural accomplishments.

The scope of culture includes knowledge, in addition to self-cultivation, morality, etc., knowledge but not necessarily cultivation.

1. Knowledge but no culture: It means that the knowledge reserve is very rich, and I have read a lot of books, but I have not learned the truth of treating people and things from books.

2. For example, a person who is very good at technology can be said to be very knowledgeable in this technology. But because he is not well educated in other areas, such as self-cultivation, conduct, and morality, this person is likely to be full of foul language and ignorant of some basic common sense. That's why we also call this kind of person uneducated.

3. In his speech, Yu Dan criticized the middle school students cultivated by the current education system from time to time for "having knowledge but no culture", and the phenomenon of high scores and low ability is serious. She said that many students who are admitted to prestigious universities in Beijing still do not know how to get along with others, have a rigid relationship with their parents and relatives, and fight with their classmates over trivial matters in school.

4. Some people directly learn to be nerds. "Secondary school teachers not only teach students knowledge and conclusions, but more importantly, teach them the starting point of thinking. Yu Dan said, "If you want to talk about knowledge, what knowledge can't be installed in today's computers, and the Internet is so developed, using search engines."

5. She believes that in middle school, teachers should teach students two words: "loyalty" and "forgiveness". Be more "loyal" to yourself and "forgive" to others.

Yu Dan said: "Doing things seriously is loyalty, treating others leniently is forgiveness, if you can't learn these two words, no matter how high the score is, the students are useless." ”

Lack of culture and lack of knowledge mean the same thing in a certain concept, but not identically.

Uneducated refers to uneducated people, generally grandparents.

The meaning of ignorance is the same as that of ignorance, that is, it does not understand the meaning of a certain aspect.

No culture is not the same as no knowledge, and being educated is not the same as having knowledge.

No culture and no knowledge, the meaning here is the same. Because culture and knowledge are equivalent.

No culture is demeaning in a demeaning way, not particularly good and unknowledgeable, just simply saying that the level of education is not enough,

Of course, it is not the same meaning, the connotation and periphery of no culture are much higher than that of no knowledge, and no culture is indeed terrible.

Culture is based on the invention of human wisdom, knowledge is only a slice of it, but now education is still relatively single to the output of knowledge, people have more or less lost the idea of inheritance of culture, so the development of culture is far less than the development of knowledge, knowledge is like the essence of culture, are left by later generations to its dross.

Knowledgeable and uneducated means having all kinds of higher education, but not knowing how to deal with people, not being educated, knowledge is a convicted knowledge of a certain subject, and these knowledge has the potential to be used for a specific purpose.

"Literate people" refers to: educated and knowledgeable people are called literate people. Knowledge belongs to culture, and culture is the sublimation of sensibility and knowledge.

Knowledge is practice, culture is theory, and now refers to quality, moral level, etc. High literacy proves that there is more learning and more books read.

People who are literate and knowledgeable, because they have a lot of experience, see the world from a slightly different perspective than uneducated people.

After enriching my life experience, I realized that all the phenomena that exist in the world have their own reasons for people's needs. Therefore, they have an incredible tolerance for people, things and things, and the older they get, the greater their tolerance. The so-called "people reach old age and are half close to Zen" is this principle.

Generally, young people, due to the limitation of experience, will not be accustomed to some things, and will deny some people and things that are different from their own worldview, which is manifested in anger. There are many such young people on the Internet, and most of the people who are called angry young people and trolls are this kind of people. Once these people experience more, they will be much less angry, and after slowly understanding more things, they will have more tolerance.

It is more civilized to speak.

I think cultured people read words and looks when they speak. What to say and what not to say. Before every sentence is spoken, it will be thought about by the brain, whether it will hurt people or attract people not to listen to it. If they find that what they said is wrong, they will correct it or apologize.

And uneducated people are, what to say, not to be indiscriminate, to run the train with their mouths full, and to talk nonsense. Words that are often spoken do not go through the brain, often hurting the other person. Every time you hurt the other party, you always refute the other party's words unreasonably, you say 1 sentence, he waits for you 10 sentences, anyway, you feel disgusted, there is no common word to say.

A literate and knowledgeable person can understand and use what he knows in his speech, and there is basically no difference except that, laughing and scolding.

Pay attention to adjectives, be concise, and express a clear point.

Personally, I think this view is true to some extent, but not necessarily completely. The other part can be filled with experience.

First of all, the reason that supports your point of view is that knowledge exercises the mind and opens the horizon, so when looking at problems, it is not only an expansion of the field of vision, but also a different perspective for thinking.

For example, two things that were originally opposites, freedom and shackles, then from the perspective of ordinary people, these two are absolutely opposites. But those who have experienced the Ulbis Ring will know that these two segments will not be opposites in a certain dimension, but two ends of the same thing. Only in the midst of the confinement can you break through and be free.

At the same time, in the excessive pursuit of freedom, freedom itself becomes a confinement.

Knowledge can help people to constantly open up their horizons and merge their horizons.

On the other hand, while studying, it is a journey of thousands of miles.

If you see more, you will naturally not be limited by the current situation. But most of the time, the outside world is beautiful, but not everyone has the courage to leave.

In fact, it is nothing more than that the body and soul are on the way. This is indeed a clear difference from those who stay in place, and the more intuitive embodiment is in the way of speaking. And in fact, there are differences in all aspects, don't you think?

People do have different cultural and social levels, and there are indeed differences in thinking and communicating. The reason is that the direction and angle of the problem are different. People at a high level look at the essence of the problem. Deal with the problem from the essence. People with low literacy tend to deal with problems from appearances.

That is, of course, because those who have knowledge are highly educated, educated, and educated.

There are good and bad people in this person... Gutter oil: Do you let people who haven't read a book do it? ·· Don't kill everyone with a bamboo pole, it's mainly about people.

It's different, because their thinking patterns are different, and their environment is different.

I think there are two kinds of people who have knowledge and culture, the way they speak and the way they think, those who have rich life experience and those who are highly knowledgeable and technological.

There are some people who have no knowledge and culture.

Their way of speaking and thinking is different, there is no one in this society who speaks and thinks exactly the same, and I think that the way of speaking and thinking is related to everyone's life experience and cultural level. But there is no high or low.

Thank you and share it together.

Yes, books are the ladder of human progress, and this sentence is not false.