The Sony camera seems to be good for portraits with Zeiss lenses, similar to Canon s, right?

Hello, in the evaluation of various majors, the optical performance of Zeiss lenses is better than that of Canon lenses, and many Canon users will also give up the autofocus function and choose the Zeiss manual head of the Canon mount (Zeiss automatic head is unique to Sony), because Sony entered the field of photography a long time later than Canon, so the professional user base is less than Canon, so many professional users will use Canon cameras to produce great **, and the number of good films produced by Sony users is relatively small. Sony's sensors are generally better than Canon sensors in DXO's professional evaluations, and most Nikon cameras also use Sony sensors, so you can definitely shoot better than Canon in terms of hardware**, the key is to accumulate more photography experience, and there are top masters who can produce good films in each brand's camera user group.

If you're referring to Sony small digital cameras, that kind of OEM Carl. Zeiss lenses are pure gimmicks, the same as Panasonic's OEM Leica lenses, all because they have no photographic background, pull up the big brand and strengthen the façade, in fact, the G lens of Minolta pedigree used by Sony's advanced models is very good.

As for Sony's SLR camera, Sony's trademark autofocus lens from Zeiss is really good, such as PlanArt*85mm and Sonnar T*135mm, the two 10,000-yuan portrait heads, are outstanding.

Sony's Carl Zeiss lenses currently have 16-35, 24-70, 24 2, 85, and 135, which are characterized by a strong German flavor, and there is not much difference between Zeiss coating and full aperture resolution.

The ratio of the same focal length with Canon ——

16-35 Look at the MTF two are almost the same, the color is different to the eye;

Sony's 2470ZA is definitely much better than Canon's old 2470L, backlight, purple edges, contrast, edge resolution are much stronger, search a lot of information on the Internet, the new 2470L is not on the market, I don't know;

The 24ZA is slightly worse than Canon's 24L2, and Canon's is too perfect

The maximum aperture of the 85ZA is not as good as Canon's 85L, but it is available with full opening, and it is not picky, each has its own merits;

135ZA beats Canon's 135L, in addition to the 135STF that is not as good as the family, I personally think there are only two words to describe - strong!

Having said that, in fact, each high-level lens has its own victory, and whichever one you enter will naturally use whichever one you enter, and there will be no absolutely good situation of one family; Each has its own irreplaceable lens, and it is worth getting started with these lenses - Canon's use is not good, I just feel that 24L is invincible, Sony's 35G, 85Za, 135Za, 135STF, especially 720G are not to be missed.

Of course, it's Canon, only Nikon can compare with Canon, I think Canon SLR is completely professional, and the old feeling is that Sony's aperture is poor.

I think Sony's is better than Canon, and the photos are clear.

There is no comparison, it can only be said that each has its own strengths.

Zeiss heads are good but expensive; The camera is not only about the lens and CMOS, but also about integration, and the problems and details in the integration process are also very important, and so is experience, and this should be what Canon and Nikon are good at.

Just like assembling a computer, take the best CPU, motherboard, memory, hard disk, and if you use other auxiliary things that are not good, the system is unstable.

1. This Zeiss is not another Zeiss.

2. Pi Zeiss is recognized as an excellent product.

3. No one agrees that Sony G lenses and Zeiss heads are the best heads.

4. The SLR camera is a system, which involves the lens support, product design, and core technology (the core technology is more than one CMOS).

In fact, cameras have the same personality as people, and the machines of each brand manufacturer give people different feelings. It is unscientific to say which manufacturer's machine is good, because the focus of each one is different, and you can only say which one is more suitable for you. Sony's G head is really good, but Sony's Zeiss head is not Zeiss in the real sense, but OEM, and it is only Zeiss that helped to participate in the design.

It's not just the COMS that affects the camera's imaging, but also the camera's algorithms. Just like many Nikon machines use Sony's coms, but Nikon's color and Sony's color are two different things. I think it's better for you to look at the photography ** and forums when you ask questions here, which will help you improve the level of photography, and the most important thing in photography is the head behind the camera, not just the lens.

Sony has a full-frame lens and Zeiss coating made by Minolta, the effect is very good, the half-width head is actually not good, it is Tenron foundry, the quality is not good, except for a 1680 is made by Minolta, but in terms of body and image processing, Canon is still dominant, Canon is suitable for portraits, Nikon is suitable for documentary, Sony is suitable for landscapes, and commercial portraits are the main ones, so Canon has been the boss for so many years, and Canon has a series of l fixed focus, excellent imaging, Nikon is actually following Sony, The Sony lens is not perfect, and it lacks a mature and comprehensive body, and the A900 has pixels but no high sensitivity, which is not suitable for recording activities.

Sony's mirrorless DSLR cameras have been ridiculed for having more bodies than lenses, but there is no doubt that Sony still has a strong group of high-quality lenses, such as Zeiss lenses made by its ally Zeiss, and Sony's Socai lenses produced under license from Zeiss. This leads to a recognition question: what is the difference between the two ZEISS lenses with a small blue mark of ZEISS and Seepage?

The official blog of ZEISS recently gave an authoritative and systematic answer:

Sony is a giant in the consumer electronics industry, and ZEISS has extensive experience in optics, so the cooperation between the two companies can be a win-win situation, which is the premise of the cooperation between Sony and ZEISS. In terms of products, whether it is a Zeiss original lens or a Sok Cai lens authorized by Sony, the optical design is completed by Zeiss, but the original Zeiss lens is completely rented by Zeiss from the initial planning of focal length, specifications, optical characteristics, etc., while the Suo Cai lens is jointly planned by Sony and Cai. There are two types of original Zeiss lenses: manual focus and autofocus, while Suo Cai is all automatic lenses.

The biggest difference between the original Zeiss and Socai is the place of origin, Zeiss Photography Shouting Lens is made by Zeiss designated partners in Japan, and Zeiss cinema lenses are produced in Oberkochen, Germany; Socai lenses are manufactured by Sony in factories across Asia. Zeiss said that no matter where it is produced, as long as it is a lens with a small blue mark, it will be tested in strict accordance with Zeiss's quality requirements and using optical test tools developed by Zeiss for pre-production testing, and Zeiss will also regularly send staff to the Sony factory to check the production process and management system.

Judging from the official introduction of Zeiss, it seems that the difference between the original Zeiss lens and the Sony Zeiss lens is the difference between the ZEISS manufacturing and the ZEISS design. is also a small blue label, whether Suo Cai is considered Zeiss or not, you should have a conclusion by now, right?

The above is to introduce to you the difference between authentic Zeiss and Sony Zeiss, I hope it will help you!