Compare the Canon A720IS and the Panasonic FX55

It's useless to say so much, let's buy a camera for practical and durable, my brother just bought an FX55, I bought an FX100, I used to use the FX9, 6 million pixels, just changed to 100, these two machines from my point of view, I prefer the FX100

First, 12 million pixels are good for future use, but the times are changing, and the pixels will get higher and higher in the future, so 12 million is just right now

Second, Panasonic has a wide angle, which is really useful

Thirdly, as I told you, Canon still uses a No. 5 battery, which is really lagging behind.

I think it's funny upstairs, do you have a photo studio, the landlord just wants to buy a more practical one, maybe the upstairs has the money to buy a DSLR what a good camera?

If you like to take pictures of the scenery, choose the one with a wide angle, and the others are Canon good, I use the S3i

There is a code on the box, see if it is the same as the number on the camera, if it is the same, tear the label on the front of the box, there is a 16-digit number inside, and then go to the official website to check it!

First of all, you should see if it has a Chinese simplified manual, cameras sold in Chinese mainland cannot be listed without a Chinese simplified manual...

SX110 is definitely not as good as TZ15, because I am responsible for the digital part of Gome Electric, not to mention anything else, there is a big difference in workmanship, although the parameters of SX110 are good, but the material and workmanship, especially the appearance, especially for girls, are very incompatible, Panasonic TZ15 is a Leica lens, imaging is by no means worse than Canon, when it comes to workmanship, TZ15 is much better than SX110 in terms of material and workmanship, and the appearance is more beautiful than SX110, People who say that Panasonic is not good do not understand this brand, Panasonic does not say anything else, the quality is absolutely too hard, Panasonic repair rate is quite low, SX110 is not a Japanese original machine, it is a domestic or Indonesian OEM, plastic shell, No. 5 battery, the cost is quite low, TZ15 Japanese original machine, large-capacity electric board, long standby time, no matter how much stronger than TZ15 is definitely stronger than SX110!

Let's talk about ixus90, it is strongly not recommended, the appearance is too monotonous, too ugly, girls use it like a brick....Besides, 90 is not a telephoto machine, not in the same category as TZ15 and SX110, if you buy a telephoto machine, I highly recommend TZ15, if you buy a card machine, you can buy Canon IXUS870 Gold, or Sony T77 and Sony T700, the appearance is really gorgeous!

If you have a preference for telephoto lenses and prefer to set them up manually"Aperture","Shutter"These parameters, and like photography, then you should consider the SX110 is cost-effective, full manual camera, 10x optical zoom, manual function, if you like to study photography, then choose SX110 is no problem.

If taking pictures is just for commemoration, souvenir, like convenience, trouble-free, and take pictures if you want, then consider the ixus90 is also good, there are a variety of built-in modes to choose from (of course, SX110 also has a variety of modes), easy to use, but the manual function is not as complete as SX110, and the aperture shutter is basically non-adjustable.

How to say it, what machine to choose depends on what needs you have.

--Hehe, if you are a girl, then ixus90 is recommended

The shape is fashionable enough, and the function is also powerful in the card machine.

The after-sales service of the machine with a large number of holdings is also guaranteed.

The current ** is also more appropriate.

Panasonic and Canon are simply not comparable, and we admit that Panasonic's other electronic products or overall brand power are not strong enough, but in the field of digital cameras, it is still Canon and Nikon that are the dominant brands.

For the civilian masses, the most important thing is not the aspect of appearance. The important thing is that the performance is stable, and there can be no problems is the real truth).

Canon is highly recommended and supported (I am currently using Nikon's D60 and Canon's 5D, both excellent).

The Canon SX110 IS is the obvious choice.

Canon's position in the field of cameras is not to mention, the Canon SX110 IS's cost performance is much higher than the Canon IXUS 90 IS, the Canon SX110 IS's full manual, 10x zoom is incomparable to the fool-proof IXUS 90 IS, so if it were me, definitely choose the Canon SX110 IS.

The difference in configuration is not too big, I think it depends on the purpose you use, whether it is to learn photography or urgent entertainment, whether there are requirements for telephoto or manual, Canon's camera reputation may be better, in fact, there is not much difference between cameras now, Canon SX110 IS is better than Canon IXUS 90 IS configuration, but the technology required is also higher, because it is fully manual, IXUS 90 IS is relatively simple to operate.

Girl,That's ixus90,But ixus870 is also good.,Although the landlord didn't mention it.,But it's really good.,There's a 28mm wide angle.,It's very useful when traveling and taking group photos.。

Canon Ixus personally feels the best, this kind of thing is difficult to compare, if it is really compared, it will be a loss for the company.

From a practical point of view, it should be that the Canon A720is is more cost-effective!

**Good cameras between 2000-2500 and also:

Sony W200

Panasonic FX50

Fujifilm S6500

Olympus-725SW (U725), etc.

I think Canon's home camera should be at the top of the list among other brands. The quality is really good.

You should choose A720, which is a little more cost-effective.

Canon A590is Parameters: 8.3 million pixels, 4x optical zoom, Inch display, Optical image stabilization, AA battery*2 The price is around 1300.

Canon A720is Parameters: 8.3 million pixels, 6x optical zoom, Inch display, Optical image stabilization, AA battery*2 The price is around 1500.

Canon IXUS 80IS parameters: 8 million pixels, 3x optical zoom, inch display, optical image stabilization, dedicated lithium battery, NB-4L, The price is around 1800.

The first two are Canon home A series, which are extremely cost-effective, and AA batteries are more convenient to buy, while the last one is Canon's fashionable card player IXUS series, which are very value-for-money! And these are all using SD cards, which is also very convenient to buy!

It looks like it's me on the ninth floor! So it's only 85is!

At present, the latest** of this camera is 1980 yuan. In terms of appearance, the Canon Ixus 85 IS has a simple body with rounded corners. Both the front and rear of the fuselage have a soft, curved design, while the controls on the back have been integrated into the exterior of the fuselage.

A 3-inch 230,000-pixel LCD screen is used on the back of the fuselage, which has an excellent display effect.

Canon Ixus 85 IS

In terms of performance, the Canon Ixus 85 is uses a 1-inch effective pixel with 10 million CCD sensors, a maximum resolution of 3648*2736, and a DigiC III image processor, which performs well in the color reproduction of image quality. In terms of the lens, it supports 3x optical zoom with an equivalent focal length of 35-105mm, and the lens supports IS optical image stabilization, which provides good image stabilization when shooting at night. ISO sensitivity supports ISO80-1600.

The shutter supports 15-1 1500 seconds. Advanced face priority and motion detection, as well as high ISO 1600 sensitivity, as well as fun and useful features such as image sunset mode, shortcut function setting, and easy print reservation.

Canon Ixus 85 is the main parameters are as follows:

Image sensor size 1 inch.

Effective pixels: 10 million.

The highest resolution is 3648*2736

Image Processor DigiC III

Optical zoom 3x.

Equivalent to 35mm size 35-105

Digital zoom 4x.

Display size 3 inches.

Shutter speed 15-1 1500 sec.

Sensitivity Auto, High ISO Sensitivity Auto ISO80 100 200 400 800 1600

Image stabilization Optical image stabilization.

The main point is that stabilization (IS) is very important for beginners, and it is absolutely impossible to take a picture of the scenery on the boat without stabilization, and it is also necessary to take pictures of the evening scenery. The above machines all have anti-shake, and the rest depends on personal preference, whether it is a large household machine or a portable fashion card machine!

LZ, only Canon has good optical image stabilization in consumer machines, and Panasonic also has Nikon (remove the brand you explicitly said you don't want).

I don't think the Canon looks good, but the quality reputation is very goodPanasonic, and I myself use Panasonic's LX2. I think the operation interface is very simple and easy to understand,2000There are a lot of Panasonic cards at the price of yuan,The advantage of choosing Panasonic is,Almost all Panasonic cards are optical image stabilization plus wide angle,This is quite good for shooting scenery。 There are not many cards with a wide angle on the market, such as Sony's card, which is one that does not have a wide angle.

I've only used Nikon's DSLR, so I don't know!

I've only used Panasonic's consumer cameras, and I personally feel very good, so I hope it will help you.

Also, don't think about Fuji, his telephoto model doesn't have image stabilization, let alone cards!

Who said that anti-shake is not necessary, you don't have to turn on the flash indoors at night, there is no anti-shake, there is no tripod, and the ** shot is abstract!

Panasonic's after-sales service is not good? I'm a Panasonic user and I think it's good!

According to me, I've been looking at the camera market for so long, let's talk about my own opinion, the Canon one you said will be discontinued if you don't buy it, Nikon's camera can only buy a DSLR, consumer digital must not be bought, Panasonic's machine has to be bought to see luck, because the after-sales service is not very good, I now use Fujifilm's camera, I don't think optical image stabilization is very useful, as long as your hand doesn't shake, it's nothing, after all, the camera is so light, it should still be able to hold it steadily, my S6500 weighs a pound and a half, I'm fine!

If you have to buy optical image stabilization, you should consider Fuji's machine, F100FD, the cost performance is outstanding, and I have used it, it seems that Fuji's color is really good, and Fuji's CCD is still very well-known in the industry! Canon's machine is ok, but the value for money is poor!

It's a bit messy, but I still recommend you to buy Fuji's F100FD, a set may be a bit over**, but it's definitely affordable and cost-effective!!

There is another one outside of your consideration,His performance parameters are average,But the cost performance is also very high,It depends on what you are buying a camera for,If there are no special requirements, how good,This can also be considered,It is Casio's V7,7 is photo-variable with optical image stabilization,Now the set is estimated to be about 1200,Very cost-effective! You can go online and take a look**, parameters, and think about how!

Of course, if you really have so much money and want to buy something better, then find a better store to take down the F100FD!!

Finally, welcome to join the photography community! Hehe!

I'm a user of f50fd.

Honestly, there's nothing to pick at all. Just f50fd.

The F100 is a pure business strategy machine with little real improvement.

The best thing about the F50 is that it has a CCD.

All those high-pixel pixels, how much zoom, are all waste. The important thing for digital cameras is CCD, and the important thing is imaging.

Of course, Panasonic is also good. There is a wide angle, and the lens is good.

f50fd bar. I was the same as you at the time, and I was also picking for a long time. But then I found out that in fact, there is such a thing as a camera, and if you buy it, you will let yourself adapt to it.

After reading the landlord's questions and replies, I feel that you are not very satisfied with the machine within 2000 that you want, some time ago, I also bought a camera, soaked in the Internet all day long, and also wanted to buy a machine of about 2000, but I chose to pick and choose, 2 months did not make up my mind, and then simply let my wife pick one, Canon 80, just bought back, I also feel the same as what I said on the Internet, this is not good, but after using it once or twice, I think it is okay, don't pursue perfection too much, In fact, about 2000 digital cameras, the performance is not much worse, or the first feeling, if you can't pick it yourself, give the money to your family or very good friends, let them help you buy, buy which one to use. It was uncomfortable for a few days. If you continue to choose like this, the more you choose, the worse you choose.

Comparison of the T-series and the IXUS series.

The advantages of the Sony T series are that the body can be made very thin, the function and shape are very stylish, the sense of high-tech is very strong, and the large touch screen.

The disadvantage is that the imaging effect is not good, this is determined by the periscope lens it uses, this lens is small, the light intake is small, although it can minimize the thickness of the fuselage, but the lens quality is very bad, so the imaging effect is very poor.

The Canon IXUS series all use telescopic lenses, with large lens aperture, relatively high lens quality, and large amount of light, so in the case of the same or similar CCD size, the imaging performance of the camera is much better, and the certainty is that the volume of the camera, especially the thickness, is relatively large.

In terms of imaging performance, none of the T series is as good as any of the IXUS series, and this is determined by the lenses used in each one.

In short, in pursuit of form and fashion, you can choose the T series (almost the only advantage), and the pursuit of performance, choose the Ixus series (in fact, it is also very stylish).

The same W series uses a telescopic lens, so the W120 is better than the T70.