How to review the logic of MBA?

In general, the MBA Logic exam tests the understanding, analysis, reasoning, argumentation, and speed and strategy of solving various information, rather than difficulty, so the difficulty of the questions is not very high, as long as you master certain problem-solving skills, you can easily solve them. Many people think that logic is difficult because we have not studied this subject, and we often use inertial thinking to think about problems when we first start doing problems, resulting in slow problem solving speed and high error rate.

The logic questions in the MBA Logic exam involve two forms, one is formal logic and the other is argumentative logic.

Formal logic is basically a set of formulas, "What if... Well", "as long as ... You think about how simple this kind of problem would be if you replaced all the complex language with such formulas.

The specific topics of argument logic include hypothesis, support, disapproval, evaluation, etc. The most important thing is to find the "cause-effect" or what causes what, to be able to clearly separate the two, and then analyze the connection between them, and to solve the problem easily.

Review suggestions on logic: read the textbooks and exam syllabus, systematically understand the basic knowledge of logic, concepts and problem-solving methods, and start to do test questions, mainly based on past past questions, logic questions must be practiced more to get a feeling, and if you do more questions and add some skills, you can also summarize your own set of judgment methods. If you have the conditions, you can choose a tutorial class, because you may not be able to get out of the dead end in the early stage, and the skills of the tutor teachers for many years can help you more effectively.

The logic part of the MBA is generally examinedFormal logic, argumentative logic, and analytical reasoningThree contents. To tell the truth, the content of the logic part is really not difficult, and all the knowledge points may only be twenty or thirty, like me, who have a good memory, can basically master it in twenty days (put it simply).

So why do many people say that logic is easy to pull points?

This is because even if some people learn the content of the logic part, they only score 30 or 40 points, because they can't completely change their inherent thinking. Although there is logic everywhere in life, MBA is an exam after all, so you have to break some routines, right? Hey, those who are not used to breaking the routine will naturally not be able to get high scores.

So, a good learning method is really important.

When I was preparing for the logic exam, I used itThe textbook of Guan Zong's logic book is learned with Peng Wen's MBA logic course。It is still difficult to score more than 50 points in the logic piece, after all, the logic of all kinds of twists and turns is particularly head-catchingIn this regard, you must understand Peng Wen thoroughly, and the high score is not a problem。I will organize the key points of the teacher in class directly into the textbook, so that it is very convenient to check the key points at any time.

The teacher's question-making skills are very practical, and he will use some real-life examples to explain more complex topics. After listening, I went to do the question, and found that the methods and skills he gave could be directly applied to the question. Take the topic of formal logic, for exampleAfter quickly grasping the main information in the question, I can quickly find the correct answer without having to read the question at length

If you want to get a high score of 50+, it must be no problem to ask Peng Wen again.

After reading Peng's question, you should do the question in timeI really think it's very easy to use the MBA Logic Winning 1000 questionsMany of the questions in it are very classic real questions, and I will set a time for myself when I brush them and treat them as exams. Although the content of the logic part is more brain-burning, compared with several other subjects, it should be the easiest part to make a breakthrough and get a high score.

So don't really think how difficult the logic part is, as long as you listen to the lecture seriously and brush the questions honestly, you will definitely get the score you want in the exam.

Finally, I wish you all a smooth landing!

Logic is a new subject, self-study will take a lot of time to master, on the contrary, you follow the tutorial class to learn, to understand more clearly, compared with the results of candidates every year, it is difficult to do more than half of the logic questions correctly, even if it is very good, in the joint entrance examination, the reading of logic questions is really large, in the joint entrance examination, the time given to logic candidates is not very long, each question may only have a few minutes to solve the problem, and you still have to understand the logical relationship inside. It's really not easy, so problem-solving skills are a must to help you solve problems quickly and save a lot of time doing other related problems.

Logical thinking is different from everyday thinking, and we will have a process of thinking transformation when we are learning. Therefore, when you first start learning logic, you may not understand, adapt, or even want to roar.

These are normal, not a reflection of not being able to learn, and when you get used to it a little, the situation will improve. Therefore, it is best to be mentally prepared first, so as not to be intimidated when you are not comfortable at the beginning.

At this stage, it is important to have a preliminary understanding of the basic knowledge of logic, it doesn't matter if you don't understand or don't know how to do the questions, the important thing is to slowly transform into logical thinking and play a role in getting started. Classify the various knowledge points of logic and the corresponding questions, and break through them one by one. Modular summaries of what you have learned, past exams, mock exams, and filling in gaps.

Understand ≠ will do, will do ≠ do it right, do it right≠ do it right quickly, and doing it right quickly is our goal. Therefore, you have to do corresponding exercises during and after the lecture.

You can take a look at the exam syllabus and the past questions from last year's exam.

Then you can choose a teacher to focus on keeping up with the teacher's class style and speed.

Stick to some topics every year, practice makes perfect.

Logic. The logical reasoning part of the comprehensive ability test mainly tests the candidate's understanding, analysis and synthesis of various information, as well as the corresponding logical thinking ability such as judgment, reasoning and argumentation, and does not test the professional knowledge of logic. The questions cover various fields such as nature, society and humanities, but do not test professional knowledge in related fields.

The content of the test questions mainly includes:

a) Concept. 1. Types of concepts.

2. Relationships between concepts.

3. Definitions.

4. Division.

2) Judgment. 1. The type of judgment.

2. The relationship between judgments.

c) Reasoning. 1. Deductive reasoning.

2. Inductive reasoning.

3. Analogical reasoning.

4. Comprehensive reasoning.

4) Argumentation. 1. Analysis of argumentation methods.

2. Demonstration and evaluation.

1) Strengthen. 2) Weakened.

3) Explanation. 4) Miscellaneous.

3. Fallacy identification.

1) Confusing concepts.

2) Shift the topic.

3) Self-contradiction.

4) Ambiguity.

5) Improper analogies.

6) Partial generalization.

7) Other fallacies.

Logic questions are often a headache for test takers, because it is necessary to find the best one among similar answers, which requires strong logical thinking. But often there are rules to follow in logic questions. There is a lot of learning on the Internet, you can do a few sets of real questions to find the rules, and then combine it with teaching to see what the teacher's thinking method is.

All in all, it is very important to summarize the answer ideas.

The current logic exam questions have changed, and the current logic exam is mainly two types of questions, the first type is the reasoning questions (hypothetical reasoning, syllogism reasoning, comprehensive reasoning, etc.), these reasoning questions are similar to our mathematics, they all have a fixed practice, and they have mastered the way to do the questions, and the new logic questions are just a change of background.

<> such a question, the steps to do it:

Review and judge the truth and false topics: the first step is to find contradictions.

1) If there is a contradiction, there must be one truth and one falsehood in the contradiction, and the truth or falsehood of other sentences can be determined; According to the conclusion obtained from other sentences, in turn, we look at who is true and who is false in the contradiction, and if it can be determined, it will be determined, and if it cannot be determined, it will directly look at the options.

2) If there is no contradiction, if there is a hypothesis, turn the hypothesis into a selection of words [note that only in this case, the hypothesis is a choice, and it is better to distinguish other cases, and then look at the relationship between judgments (that is, to see who is true and who must be true); If there are recurring objects, look for recurring objects; If there is no recurrence, then look for yourself and your own anti (do not look for statements with and); If there is no "repetition" and "self and one's own anti", then it depends on who is true, and who must be true.

<> comprehensive reasoning, such as this question, some students get this question, basically blindfolded, even if it can be done, it is quite slow, if so, then it is recommended that you master two points, such a question is done quickly and accurately.

The first one: what are the characteristics of the ontology? Feature 1:

Corresponding to the problem, I have to mark the same symbol for the same kind of problem, the purpose is that I can see clearly and quickly; Feature 2: There are falsehoods and others, and there are falsehoods and othersWe have to start with others and establish the relationship between others and falsehoods.

The second: after the characteristics of the question are determined, we will quickly enter the solution, the others are (1) and (2), we will first look at (1) we have to go to the hypothesis to find "Liqiu" and "cool breeze", we find that there is no, then we have to look at (2), there are "winter solstice", "not Zhou wind" and "Guang Mo wind" these 3 objects, we must first look at the "winter solstice", because it can only be selected in the "not Zhou Feng" and "Guang Mo Feng", can not be selected in other places, but "not Zhou Feng" and "Guang Mo Feng" correspond to whom, We didn't know, so we found it (4).

The questions of comprehensive reasoning must be done in this way, or they will be exhausted.

Argument logic: There are many small types of argument logic, such as hypothesis, strengthening, weakening, explanation, etc., but the study of law is basically similar.

MBA writing is divided into two parts, one is the analysis of the validity of the argument and the other is the argument essay. Both arguments and arguments are called "arguments", so MBA writing mainly assesses the candidate's logical thinking ability. This kind of writing style, as long as you are proficient in certain writing skills, plus some case accumulation, you can score effectively.

An argument validity analysis is a piece of material that contains a number of small inferences, and asks the candidate to identify a few logical errors in the essay and use arguments to explain why these problems are problems, mainly to test your critical thinking skills. The structure of the article can adopt a fixed total-score-total structure, and you can express your views and opinions in an orderly manner, without the need to be exhaustive, and select the key points for analysis.

The essay will give a question, and the test taker will analyze the views expressed in the test question and express his or her views and opinions, including: support, disapproval, general support for a number of reservations, etc. The topics of the essays are closely related to life and work, such as long-term considerations or practical economic interests, and examine creative thinking.

The effect of the argument is to make people understand, believe, and act.

Writing is actually an examination of our comprehensive ability, in addition to paying more attention to reading articles and accumulating materials, it is more important to improve our ability in thinking logic.

Teacher Duxue Wang: (1) Logic can start from the real questions in the exams in recent years, study repeatedly, study the ideas of the questions and the common ways of setting the wrong options, classify the wrong questions together, study the reasons for the mistakes, and supplement the knowledge loopholes; In the later stage, do high-quality mock questions to cultivate a sense of language for unfamiliar topics; Pay attention to the "formality" of logic, grasp the key information, and quickly find the title and logical structure of the topic; Do a whole set of questions and arrange the logical answering time reasonably.

2) Chinese writing is a module that candidates have ignored before preparing for the exam, many people mistakenly think that writing can be done as long as they memorize a sample essay before the exam, as everyone knows, doing so, will get a very low score, candidates must practice completing nearly ten years of argumentation validity analysis of the real questions, form their own basic writing routines, prepare two standard beginnings and ends, so that in the examination room, in order to complete an article in the shortest possible time.

At the same time, after writing the article, you must rewrite it, otherwise such exercises are meaningless. For argumentative essays, you should accumulate some excellent articles, and you can read more first-class review articles to enhance your ability to argue.

3) It is necessary to complete at least ten sets of mock question training, cultivate the feeling of the examination room, adapt to the rhythm of the examination room, and pay attention to the order of practice and the time allocation of each module, so that in the examination room, "there is food in the hand, and there is no panic in the heart".