MBA logic, how are you going to review

The written test subjects of MBA include two parts: Management Comprehensive and English II, and Management Comprehensive covers three parts: Logic, Mathematics and Writing

In view of this, it is recommended that candidates give priority to finding some systematic courses from the Internet to study, and grasp the difficulties and key points of the logic exam in advance, so as to improve the efficiency and effect of their later review.

As the examinee said, most of the question types in the logic part are multiple-choice questions, and it is still easy for the examinee to grasp the score, but the examinee should make it clear that the management comprehensive is a whole paper, and the examinee should not only do the question correctly but also grasp the time to do the question when doing the question, so the examinee should strengthen the practice in ordinary times, use the tactics of the sea of questions, and do more questions.

The MBA logic part and the writing part of the argument validity analysis is related to a certain extent, candidates can combine these two parts together to review when reviewing, in addition, candidates should focus on giving priority to the real questions, it can be said that in addition to the past questions, other mock questions even if the level is high, can not grasp the idea of the postgraduate examination, it is recommended that candidates must not abandon the basics, must always take the real questions as the core.

In general, the MBA Logic exam tests the understanding, analysis, reasoning, argumentation, and speed and strategy of solving various information, rather than difficulty, so the difficulty of the questions is not very high, as long as you master certain problem-solving skills, you can easily solve them. Many people think that logic is difficult because we have not studied this subject, and we often use inertial thinking to think about problems when we first start doing problems, resulting in slow problem solving speed and high error rate.

The logic questions in the MBA Logic exam involve two forms, one is formal logic and the other is argumentative logic.

Formal logic is basically a set of formulas, "What if... Well", "as long as ... You think about how simple this kind of problem would be if you replaced all the complex language with such formulas.

The specific topics of argument logic include hypothesis, support, disapproval, evaluation, etc. The most important thing is to find the "cause-effect" or what causes what, to be able to clearly separate the two, and then analyze the connection between them, and to solve the problem easily.

Review suggestions on logic: read the textbooks and exam syllabus, systematically understand the basic knowledge of logic, concepts and problem-solving methods, and start to do test questions, mainly based on past past questions, logic questions must be practiced more to get a feeling, and if you do more questions and add some skills, you can also summarize your own set of judgment methods. If you have the conditions, you can choose a tutorial class, because you may not be able to get out of the dead end in the early stage, and the skills of the tutor teachers for many years can help you more effectively.

Generally speaking, according to the progress of learning, logical learning can be divided into the following five stages: the beginner stage; Application summary stage; Proficiency Improvement Stage; Fill in the gaps; Logic master stage. Beginner Stage:

When I first came into contact with logic subjects, I was very involved in the learning of the basic knowledge of logic, and began to do some problems, but I didn't know why the questions were done correctly or why the questions were wrong, and most of the questions were done intuitively. Application summary stage: begin to apply the basic knowledge of logic learned to solve problems, masters begin to summarize the rules of solving various types of problems, and begin to seek the know-how to solve problems quickly, at this time, every wrong problem is an opportunity to improve.

Proficiency improvement stage: Begin to master the rules of solving most types of problems, and slowly understand the feeling of correct problem solving in practice, and begin to form their own mantras for doing problems. Fill in the gaps;

Begin to improve the summary of the rules of various types of problems, and begin to pay attention to the speed of training to do problems. Logic master stage: all logic problems are done quickly and accurately, reaching the highest level of doing logic problems, although at this time to do the problem is also based on intuition, but this time intuition and the intuition of the beginner stage have an essential difference, this time the intuition is based on rationality, and the previous intuition is based on the basis of emotion.

Learning task: Read and summarize the basic reasoning, weakening, supporting, hypothesis, explanation, and logic application problem solving rules carefully; Complete all the past exam questions for each type of question. Learning Styles & Consolidation:

After summarizing each type of question, do about 50 questions to consolidate, summarize the wrong questions in detail, find out the reasons for the mistakes, and find out the measures to prevent mistakes again. Proficiency Improvement Stage: Goal:

Learn to read the structure of the question, quickly find out the arguments and conclusions in the question stem, and identify the characteristics of the argument style. More than 100 questions of each type are trained, and you can find a way that suits you to do the questions quickly. Learning & Consolidation:

Start working on time-limited questions, discover your strengths and weaknesses, and find out why you are strong and why you are weak. Fill in the gaps stage: Objectives:

Start doing mock questions and summarize the ones that you find unfamiliar or time-consuming. Learning style and consolidation: Do 50 mock questions every day before the exam, pay attention to the grasp of time, and the improvement of your weaknesses.

Master stage: Goal: Doing logic problems is like counting 1+1=2, each logic problem is like a small game, and there is no time limit.

It is enough for ordinary students to reach the stage of checking and filling in the gaps. Time allocation for the first four stages: Beginner stage 15, Application summary stage 40, Proficiency improvement stage 60, Fill in the gaps stage 30

Logical thinking is different from everyday thinking, and we will have a process of thinking transformation when we are learning. Therefore, when you first start learning logic, you may not understand, adapt, or even want to roar.

These are normal, not a reflection of not being able to learn, and when you get used to it a little, the situation will improve. Therefore, it is best to be mentally prepared first, so as not to be intimidated when you are not comfortable at the beginning.

At this stage, it is important to have a preliminary understanding of the basic knowledge of logic, it doesn't matter if you don't understand or don't know how to do the questions, the important thing is to slowly transform into logical thinking and play a role in getting started. Classify the various knowledge points of logic and the corresponding questions, and break through them one by one. Modular summaries of what you have learned, past exams, mock exams, and filling in gaps.

Understand ≠ will do, will do ≠ do it right, do it right≠ do it right quickly, and doing it right quickly is our goal. Therefore, you have to do corresponding exercises during and after the lecture.

You can take a look at the exam syllabus and the past questions from last year's exam.

Then you can choose a teacher to focus on keeping up with the teacher's class style and speed.

Stick to some topics every year, practice makes perfect.

Logic. The logical reasoning part of the comprehensive ability test mainly tests the candidate's understanding, analysis and synthesis of various information, as well as the corresponding logical thinking ability such as judgment, reasoning and argumentation, and does not test the professional knowledge of logic. The questions cover various fields such as nature, society and humanities, but do not test professional knowledge in related fields.

The content of the test questions mainly includes:

a) Concept. 1. Types of concepts.

2. Relationships between concepts.

3. Definitions.

4. Division.

2) Judgment. 1. The type of judgment.

2. The relationship between judgments.

c) Reasoning. 1. Deductive reasoning.

2. Inductive reasoning.

3. Analogical reasoning.

4. Comprehensive reasoning.

4) Argumentation. 1. Analysis of argumentation methods.

2. Demonstration and evaluation.

1) Strengthen. 2) Weakened.

3) Explanation. 4) Miscellaneous.

3. Fallacy identification.

1) Confusing concepts.

2) Shift the topic.

3) Self-contradiction.

4) Ambiguity.

5) Improper analogies.

6) Partial generalization.

7) Other fallacies.

Logic questions are often a headache for test takers, because it is necessary to find the best one among similar answers, which requires strong logical thinking. But often there are rules to follow in logic questions. There is a lot of learning on the Internet, you can do a few sets of real questions to find the rules, and then combine it with teaching to see what the teacher's thinking method is.

All in all, it is very important to summarize the answer ideas.

The current logic exam questions have changed, and the current logic exam is mainly two types of questions, the first type is the reasoning questions (hypothetical reasoning, syllogism reasoning, comprehensive reasoning, etc.), these reasoning questions are similar to our mathematics, they all have a fixed practice, and they have mastered the way to do the questions, and the new logic questions are just a change of background.

<> such a question, the steps to do it:

Review and judge the truth and false topics: the first step is to find contradictions.

1) If there is a contradiction, there must be one truth and one falsehood in the contradiction, and the truth or falsehood of other sentences can be determined; According to the conclusion obtained from other sentences, in turn, we look at who is true and who is false in the contradiction, and if it can be determined, it will be determined, and if it cannot be determined, it will directly look at the options.

2) If there is no contradiction, if there is a hypothesis, turn the hypothesis into a selection of words [note that only in this case, the hypothesis is a choice, and it is better to distinguish other cases, and then look at the relationship between judgments (that is, to see who is true and who must be true); If there are recurring objects, look for recurring objects; If there is no recurrence, then look for yourself and your own anti (do not look for statements with and); If there is no "repetition" and "self and one's own anti", then it depends on who is true, and who must be true.

<> comprehensive reasoning, such as this question, some students get this question, basically blindfolded, even if it can be done, it is quite slow, if so, then it is recommended that you master two points, such a question is done quickly and accurately.

The first one: what are the characteristics of the ontology? Feature 1:

Corresponding to the problem, I have to mark the same symbol for the same kind of problem, the purpose is that I can see clearly and quickly; Feature 2: There are falsehoods and others, and there are falsehoods and othersWe have to start with others and establish the relationship between others and falsehoods.

The second: after the characteristics of the question are determined, we will quickly enter the solution, the others are (1) and (2), we will first look at (1) we have to go to the hypothesis to find "Liqiu" and "cool breeze", we find that there is no, then we have to look at (2), there are "winter solstice", "not Zhou wind" and "Guang Mo wind" these 3 objects, we must first look at the "winter solstice", because it can only be selected in the "not Zhou Feng" and "Guang Mo Feng", can not be selected in other places, but "not Zhou Feng" and "Guang Mo Feng" correspond to whom, We didn't know, so we found it (4).

The questions of comprehensive reasoning must be done in this way, or they will be exhausted.

Argument logic: There are many small types of argument logic, such as hypothesis, strengthening, weakening, explanation, etc., but the study of law is basically similar.

MBA writing is divided into two parts, one is the analysis of the validity of the argument and the other is the argument essay. Both arguments and arguments are called "arguments", so MBA writing mainly assesses the candidate's logical thinking ability. This kind of writing style, as long as you are proficient in certain writing skills, plus some case accumulation, you can score effectively.

An argument validity analysis is a piece of material that contains a number of small inferences, and asks the candidate to identify a few logical errors in the essay and use arguments to explain why these problems are problems, mainly to test your critical thinking skills. The structure of the article can adopt a fixed total-score-total structure, and you can express your views and opinions in an orderly manner, without the need to be exhaustive, and select the key points for analysis.

The essay will give a question, and the test taker will analyze the views expressed in the test question and express his or her views and opinions, including: support, disapproval, general support for a number of reservations, etc. The topics of the essays are closely related to life and work, such as long-term considerations or practical economic interests, and examine creative thinking.

The effect of the argument is to make people understand, believe, and act.

Writing is actually an examination of our comprehensive ability, in addition to paying more attention to reading articles and accumulating materials, it is more important to improve our ability in thinking logic.

Teacher Duxue Wang: (1) Logic can start from the real questions in the exams in recent years, study repeatedly, study the ideas of the questions and the common ways of setting the wrong options, classify the wrong questions together, study the reasons for the mistakes, and supplement the knowledge loopholes; In the later stage, do high-quality mock questions to cultivate a sense of language for unfamiliar topics; Pay attention to the "formality" of logic, grasp the key information, and quickly find the title and logical structure of the topic; Do a whole set of questions and arrange the logical answering time reasonably.

2) Chinese writing is a module that candidates have ignored before preparing for the exam, many people mistakenly think that writing can be done as long as they memorize a sample essay before the exam, as everyone knows, doing so, will get a very low score, candidates must practice completing nearly ten years of argumentation validity analysis of the real questions, form their own basic writing routines, prepare two standard beginnings and ends, so that in the examination room, in order to complete an article in the shortest possible time.

At the same time, after writing the article, you must rewrite it, otherwise such exercises are meaningless. For argumentative essays, you should accumulate some excellent articles, and you can read more first-class review articles to enhance your ability to argue.

3) It is necessary to complete at least ten sets of mock question training, cultivate the feeling of the examination room, adapt to the rhythm of the examination room, and pay attention to the order of practice and the time allocation of each module, so that in the examination room, "there is food in the hand, and there is no panic in the heart".