Newbies buy 6D or 7D or 70D?!

The head of the film machine is a non-CPU lens without electric shock, you can't use an electronic rangefinder, you can't use autofocus, you can't use automatic metering, the main branch is used as a lens like a telescope, it must be all manual, T and A files can't be used, you can't use any digital automatic function, and some formats are not supported, so it is recommended not to use them.

Choose 70D,First of all,70D is a new machine for 13 years,High pixels,20 million,And 7D is an old machine,The image processor used for pixels is the latest5,And 7D is the image resolution is slightly better,But this difference is not big。 The 70D back screen has high pixels, can be flipped, touched, and more convenient. On the AF system, the focus is more flexible and there are more modes.

The sensitivity is 70d100-6400, while 7d is 100-3200Everything else is pretty much the same.

Summary of advantages and disadvantages:

7D Pros.

1.Customization is abundant.

2.The shutter is stiff and the metering is accurate3Excellent workmanship and outstanding feel.

Cons 1The linkage mechanism of spot metering is not good.

2.Live view is slower to focus.

3.Movie shooting does not support autofocus.

70d advantages.

1.It feels very good, much stronger than 650d, 650d is too light, and 7d feels no different than metal and plastic2The focus is very fast, with 15 85 lenses, it's very quiet, but I haven't used other heads, I don't know how big the difference is 3

The battery is durable4It's very useful to flip the screen.,It's pretty fast to focus on the screen 5.The high feeling is very good6.

I can shoot 7 shots in a row. Let's talk about 15 85, the focal length is good, it is very convenient to travel, you can shoot anything, the focus is very quiet and fast, and there is anti-shake, and the feeling of the head is very heavy, and the workmanship is good. Disadvantages: The camera crashed once, and I don't know if it's related to parallel lenses.

The LCD screen effect is too good, deceptive, and not quite the same as on the computer.

The lens, 18-135mm is recommended, is its sleeve.

Buy 70D, 70D is newer than 7D after all, 70D's processor is better than 7D, and the pixels have reached 20 million. 70D is better than 7D in every way, both in terms of processor and pixels, sensitivity. In general, 70D is more cost-effective than 7D.

It doesn't make sense to talk about those technical content, technology is posted all over the street, and it is the law that digital products are bought new and not old, don't look at the data, and don't have to be entangled.

But I recommend 6D, and now think about yourself, if you hadn't bought the full-frame ...... directlyIt will definitely be like several friends who will change the machine sooner or later and waste some money.

EOS5, the eye-controlled focus camera, was a long time in 1998, and it seemed like 10,000 at the time.

The body supports autofocus, and it is also an EF mount, so I think it can be used with current cameras.

It's just that it's not optimized for digital cameras, and it may have purple edges or something.

You'd better find a chance to try it out under the digital body.

70d is better.

7D because the model is too old, and the noise reduction algorithm is a bit problematic, and its image quality is the weakest among the seven or eight machines of the ancestral CMOS. (The high-sensitivity image quality is even weaker than that of the 550D of the same era). And the core of the camera is the image quality, even if it has an all-metal body and a continuous shooting speed of 8 frames per second, if the image quality is poor, then these are useless.

The 70D inherits the excellent focusing system of 7D (the focusing and metering systems of the two are exactly the same), and there is a new 2000W pixel CMOS, which is significantly improved compared with 7D in terms of image quality and high sensitivity. It also adds a flip screen that is very convenient for daily use, with extremely fast real-time framing and focusing (currently the fastest in the SLR, there is no one), the flip screen is extremely practical and very easy to use. This is something that is not attainable in 7D.

Moreover, the continuous shooting speed of 7 frames per second is fast enough, and the body is lighter and easier to use. Personally, I think that unless you are a professional journalist and often go in and out of some extreme environments, 70D is definitely better than 7D in normal use.

It can be said that apart from the all-metal body and a few more shortcut keys, 7D has no advantages. What's more70D is also equipped with Canon's latest dual-pixel AF technology, the practicality of real-time framing has reached the extreme of SLR, it can be regarded as a SLR with a certain revolutionary significance, with the new sleeve 18-135STM, it can be said that there is a breakthrough in image quality and practicality.

You're quite right, the fewer digits in Canon's camera, the better. The lower the number, the more expensive it is, and the higher the grade. So 7d is better than 70d.

70d is better. The 7D model is old, except for the body material and continuous shooting speed, there is no other advantage.

That's right, 7D is definitely better than 60D or 70D, and the build quality is different, and the design direction is different.

Hello, the 7D machine is too old, I have experienced both machines (I have 70D) First of all, the focusing speed of 7D high-sensitivity pixels is not as good as 70D, and the overall level of 7D is still in that era, but 7D2 surpasses 70D

We hope you are satisfied.

7d。。。Except for the poor APSC format and image quality (and full-frame ratio), it's perfect. Workmanship, framing, focusing, continuous shooting, control, not to mention a double-digit machine like 60D, even the most expensive machines such as entry-level full-frame 5D2 and 6D cannot be compared.

If you're concerned about these aspects and don't want to be very critical about image quality, 7D is a great choice. But it is still a bit bulky for ordinary household use, you can buy 60d or wait for 70d, **cheaper, and more portable. In fact, if you play amateurly, 650d is very good, don't buy a pullover, buy a 15-85 or a new 18-135 stm

I use 7D myself, and it feels completely adequate and very easy to use. It feels very good.,The function is not outdated.,Equipped with a 50 play first.。 I will buy a wide angle one after another.

The reason why 60D was eliminated is not in terms of functionality, this type of mid-range machine is definitely enough for amateur players. The main thing is that it's too feminine. Hehe, we're still a bit machismo.

7D's focus point is still OK,Although 60D came out late,But it's not as easy to use as 7D.,People are dual-chip processing.,No matter what, it's also a flagship machine of style.。 You get what you pay for.

Compared with 60D, of course, 7D is better, and the smaller the number of Canon's SLRs, the better, regardless of whether it is new or old, the more important thing is the brain behind the machine.

60D is one gear lower than 7D, but the time to come out is also later than 7D, that is, 60D is relatively new, and on the whole, 60D is more cost-effective

7D takes a long time to come out, but the handling is not a little higher than 60D, the focus point, viewfinder frame, and processor are all only available on the 1D series, and it is a magnesium aluminum alloy body, shutter 150,000 times. 60D is just a mid-range machine, engineering plastic, 100,000 shutter speeds, not cost-effective, except for the flip screen, almost no big difference with 50D. Many professional photographers choose 7D instead of 5D2 when shooting high-speed moving objects, but the image quality of 7D is average, the film is not sharp, and post-processing is required.

The most important thing in taking pictures is focusing, the focus is aligned, the picture will be clear, and 7D is the best in focusing!

How often does money buy 7d, and if less, buy 60d. You get what you pay for.

Judging from the frame, it is all not full-frame, and it is definitely not enough after becoming proficient and understanding the camera. After all, Canon hasn't issued any EF-S lenses yet"l"License plate. Mainstream high-end lenses are all considered for full-frame cameras.

It is recommended to find a card machine with a manual function and look for a book on photography.

Canon's product line is currently divided as follows:

High-end: 1 > 5 > 6 > 7

Mid-range: 70 > 60

Low-end: 650 > 600 > 650

Pure flickering: A four-digit machine with the most advertising and the worst value for money.

The development of the 135 SLR camera to this day, there is basically nothing to break through, and the era has completed the leap breakthroughs such as autofocus, autometering, and flash metering.

Overall, it's pretty much the same.

The differences between the different classes of machines are mainly in the design of precision and some details, such as dual card, flash metering, flash synchronization, spot measurement accuracy, focusing accuracy, focusing speed, and durability and weather resistance.

In terms of controls, the simplest difference is that the higher the camera, the more external buttons there are, which in many cases increases the efficiency of shooting, provided that you are very proficient in the camera. Otherwise, looking at the button is also blind.

Shooting a concert, you should need a medium telephoto lens with good anti-glare, of course, if you can get close to the stage, you still need a wide-angle lens, but when it comes to wide-angle, you must mention that the three models that the landlord intends to buy are not suitable, and the non-full-frame is too much of a loss at the wide-angle end.

Shooting landscapes, these three machines are not suitable, in a sense, the landscape is equal to a wide angle, not full frame no play, even if it is a full frame 135 camera, it is still not enough, here involves a problem of panoramic depth, which can only be achieved by medium and large format cameras.

A lot of the great landscapes** you see are captured with a large-format camera. Take a closer look and you'll know, magnify ** by 100%, and you will find that the award-winning works have one of the most basic characteristics, which are clear everywhere, and then compare what you shot, hehe.

There is no need to buy equipment in one step, the cost is too high, and the fun of photography is lost. The equipment is limited, but the creativity is limitless.

There is no such thing as the best equipment, only the right equipment.

These three are all APS-C format machines, which are what some people call half-format machines, but 7D is a high-end machine, 60D and 70D are mid-range machines, and 70D is a successor model of 60D.

Canon 5D7D is a level, 60D70D is a level, each level has to be different, my understanding is that 5D is better than 7D, 60D is better than 70D, 5D is the advanced series, 60D is the intermediate series, 500D is the junior series, for reference only.

If someone wants to send me one, I'll pick 7D;

If you buy one yourself, you can only choose between the two, I choose 60d.

70d seems to be the most **.

The 70D is an upgraded version of the 60D.

7D is a level higher than the two, but 7D is an old model.

First of all, these are APS-C format, if the conditions are possible, it is better to choose full frame, and at present70D is the latest launch, integrating the functions of a variety of cameras, especially the first practical all-pixel dual-core CMOS AF system, to achieve real-time display mode (with the screen) under high-speed shooting, basically the same as the eyepiece shooting speed, the sensitivity effect is also greatly improved, and 7D emphasizes speed and feel, 8 high-speed continuous shooting per second (70D7 shots, sheets), metal body, The feel is really good, 60D is the ** advantage, in these models, there is no advantage.

It depends on what you like, compare the parameters.