HOW ABOUT THE NIKE ZOOM HYPERDUNK 2011 LW PE?

Updated on vogue 2024-03-06
5 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    I bought a pair at the counter for 899 for the Chinese New Year this year, and I personally feel okay, the forefoot cushioning and support are good, the back heel has a TPU support piece and a flywire on the side, and the breathability is also good (it may be quite good, because it was compared with Hyperfuse at the time), But when this pair of shoes first worn, it felt like grinding the ankles, the comfort was not enough, and only the forefoot had a Zoom air cushion (there was a lawsuit two days ago), and the most important thing is that if you are not a person with a particularly good figure, don't wear these shoes, Because these shoes look particularly slender, especially when worn with trousers, they are particularly ugly, I bought them with luminescence, and if you wear shorts + pure white socks, the socks will look yellow... It's helpless.,So I personally don't think it's good.,If you have an extra 400 yuan, you can try the high-top version.,It won't look ugly.,And the American version of the high-top version has zoom air cushions in the front and back palms.,It's very okay.。 [I hope that comrades will not pirate the achievements of my wisdom].

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    So-so... There is only a forefoot zoom air cushion, which is conducive to starting... Followed by no technology··· There are flying lines on the upper, and the shoes are relatively light as a whole... Low-top shoes, the protection is not good... If you play, it's more suitable for speed guards. If you usually wear it when you walk, forget it, the shoe type is not very good with casual wear, and sportswear is OK...

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    No, there is no other advantage except lightness, Nike's plastic shoes.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The Zoom Speed II X Low is a very good configuration of these shoes, with LUNAR foam in the forefoot and Zoom Air in the backIt's perfectly enough for cushioning.

    As a lite version of the ZK5, the ** of the shoe on sale is also cheap and has great comfort without any outright drawbacks.

    Nike HyperDunk 2010 X: Due to the abandonment of Lunaelite and carbon plates and the reduction of air cushions, the sense of technology and comfort of Hyperdunk Low has been reduced to a certain extent, but on the premise of ensuring a good foot feel, the cost has been greatly reduced, and the cost performance of HyperDunk Low is still very high. Hyperdunk Low has insufficient ankle support due to the low top, but the more solid padding of the ankle still performs well.

    The Hyperdunk Low does not have a carbon plate in the midsole, and the support is not good enough. There is no air cushion in the forefoot, but it still feels pretty good, and the power is very strong when starting, and the air sole cushioning in the back foot is good. Hyperdunk Low is not too good for abrasion resistance.

    HyperDunk Low is stable with TPU in the heel and performs well. Hyperdunk Low style is very beautiful, it can attract attention on the court, lightweight, breathable, very good wrapping, and good anti-rollover, in short, Hyperdunk Low is not much inferior to the high-top version in actual combat performance, whether in terms of wrapping, shock absorption, stability and grip and other core indicators.

    The two pairs of shoes chosen by the landlord are suitable for the outfield, and it is recommended to buy a high top if it is a concrete floor.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Outfield: Of course, the former and the latter are a little higher, but overall it is about the same, depending on personal preference.

Related questions