The verdict of the Maserati female driver hit the person was announced, why did the victim s family

Because there is a letter of understanding. Although the families of the deceased had been asking for the death penalty, the families of the living victims had forgiven and did not get their wish.

Because the family of the female driver did their best to compensate the victim afterwards and reached an agreement with them, the sentence of life was already a fair sentence.

Because the court pronounces the verdict in accordance with the provisions of Chinese law, China has a law to follow, and it cannot be said that the family can decide how the sentence is requested.

Because they accepted private mediation. Because they accepted private mediation, there was no way for Maserati owners to be sentenced to death.

Because the court held that the Maserati driver confessed the facts of his crime and actively compensated the victim for economic losses, this is a sign of remorse and can be punished lightly according to the law.

The victim's family always wanted to sentence Tan Moumou to death, but after several mediations, they finally reached a criminal understanding with Tan Moumou.

Skynet is restored and does not leak in support of the death penalty.

It's not a good thing, Tan should die, no need to pay compensation, such an ending is the best.

People have been killed, what else can be said.

On July 3, 2019, Tan Mingming, Yongcheng City, Henan Province, drove a Maserati sedan after being drunk and rear-ended a BMW car waiting for a green light. As a result of the accident, 2 people were killed and 4 were injured. Of the three people in the BMW, two men in the back seat died on the spot.

On January 16, 2020, the case was heard in public at the Intermediate People's Court of Shangqiu City, Henan Province, for more than 5 hours, and the verdict was not pronounced in court.

The two deceased were both staff members of a local Human Resources Management Bureau (HRM) before their deaths. On May 10, Ms. Cheng, the wife of one of the deceased, Ge Baojing, said that after the last **, the lawyers of the two sides had repeatedly failed to coordinate. At present, she only hopes that the court can pronounce the verdict as soon as possible and give the defendant the most powerful punishment.

As of August 2020, no results have been released.

At 8:30 on January 16, 2020, the "Henan Yongcheng Maserati Collision BMW Case" was heard in the Yongcheng People's Court.

Wang's family filed a claim of 13.95 million yuan and demanded that the three defendants be sentenced to death for immediate execution. The family of the deceased Jia Wenhua filed a claim of 12 million yuan and also demanded that the three defendants be sentenced to death for immediate execution.

The prosecution indicted the three Maserati men on charges of endangering public safety, and the trial lasted more than five hours, before the trial was adjourned and the verdict was announced.

Judging from the information disclosed in the news, intentional drunk driving, hit-and-run, and causing many deaths and injuries can be punished with the death penalty at the maximum. The details are subject to the court's decision, so please look forward to it.

The vehicles and background situations in the movie are different from reality, not to mention that the Maserati in the movie is specially strengthened, and if you are serious, you will lose.

The verdict has not yet begun.

Why is the sentence her own national law, in short, she can't control the national law, she must believe in the law, believe that the country will give everyone a satisfactory answer, don't talk nonsense below.

The gravestone is more than ten years to life imprisonment.

It's been a year, why hasn't it been sentenced yet?

How to judge what should be judged, this kind of rich second generation should be severely sentenced

With such a serious traffic accident and no signs of repentance after a drunk driver, such a female driver should be sentenced to death, and it is not an exaggeration to sentence him to death twice.

That's definitely Maserati to blame, but I think there's a lot of responsibility on both sides.

In the case of Maserati hitting a BMW, the female driver should be held primarily responsible, mainly because of her.

The female driver may bear less, as some say he has a mental illness.

This will only be decided based on a specific analysis of the specific circumstances of the incident.

For this case, the female driver should bear the main responsibility and pay the money.

It is better for the female driver to bear full responsibility, because the accident was caused by his negligence.

It is better for the female driver to be fully responsible, mainly because of her.

In the case of Maserati hitting BMW, the female driver should be primarily responsible.

Legal analysis: It took more than one year, and the "Maserati crash incident" that was hyped up on the Internet at the beginning finally came to an end today.

The incident occurred on the evening of July 3, 2019, when Tan Mingming and two other companions were eating and drinking at a barbecue restaurant on Xuefeng Road in Yongcheng City.

After drinking, the three tried to go to KTV to continue drinking and singing. However, the substitute driver who was called did not arrive for a long time, so the three of them chose to drink and drive despite drinking a lot of alcohol.

In the process of driving, they collided with 8 cars, but the three still did not stop, but chose to continue driving.

Finally, at the traffic light intersection, he rear-ended at a speed of more than 120km per hour, and directly hit the BMW car that was waiting for the signal light, causing the BMW car to be quickly knocked into the air, two people in the back seat of the car were killed, and the driver in front was injured.

After the accident, Tan Mingming fled the scene in a Maserati car. After the ** investigation, Maserati driver Tan Mingming and passengers Liu and Zhang both had an alcohol content of more than 150mg 100ml, which belonged to drunk driving.

The Intermediate People's Court of Shangqiu City, Henan Province, publicly pronounced the verdict in the Yongcheng City People's Court in the case of defendants Tan Mingming, Liu Songtao, and Zhang Xiaoqu endangering public safety by dangerous means.

For the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous means, the defendant Tan Mingming was sentenced to life imprisonment and deprived of political rights for life.

Defendant Liu Songtao was sentenced to three years imprisonment with a three-year probation.

Defendant Zhang Xiaoqu was sentenced to three years imprisonment, suspended for three years.

The defendants have reached a settlement agreement with the victim's family, and more than 50 people, including the relatives of the parties, deputies to the National People's Congress, members of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, ** reporters, and people from all walks of life, attended the verdict.

Legal basis: Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China Article 133 Anyone who drives a motor vehicle while intoxicated shall be sentenced to short-term detention and a concurrent fine. The period of short-term detention is between 1 month and 6 months, and the maximum penalty for multiple crimes cannot exceed 1 year.

If you have a blood alcohol content of 300 milligrams and 100 milliliters, you will be sentenced to 5-6 months of detention and fined thousands of yuan.

The court found that the defendant was having dinner at a skewer restaurant in Dongcheng District, Yongcheng City, Henan Province, and that the perpetrator drove a Maserati SUV to leave with his friends, driving along Tobin Road and Wenhua Road in Dongcheng District, Yongcheng City, and when approaching Huayuan Road, they hit six cars on the side of the road, hit a car on the opposite side, and then hit a car on the side of the road.

The perpetrator was forced to stop because he could not pass

The owner of the car who was hit and the people around him stepped forward to persuade them, and the friend sitting in the back told the perpetrator to leave, and the perpetrator drove along Huayuan Road and Jiji Road to the direction of the East Outer Ring Road to escape。When he arrived at the intersection of the East Outer Ring Road and Yongxing Street, he rear-ended the BMW sedan and waited for a high-speed traffic signal, which led to the BMW sedan accident, and the fire broke out, resulting in two deaths, one serious injury, and a total loss of more than 100,000 yuan in other vehicles.

The perpetrator knew that drunk driving was illegal and that drunk driving would endanger public safety, but he ignored traffic laws and public safety

After a traffic accident involving drunk driving, he ignored dissuasion and continued to drive at high speed in the city and escaped, resulting in two deaths。The serious consequences of the first injury and the loss of property, subjectively allowing successive injuries with the intention of endangering public safety, after the defendants drank together, they did not dissuade the perpetrator from driving under the influence of alcohol, and after the accident, their friends urged the perpetrator to drive away, causing serious consequences, and the actions of the three defendants constituted the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous means.

The perpetrator is the direct perpetrator of the crime, is the main perpetrator, the crime is serious, the consequences are serious, he should be punished according to law, his friend plays a secondary role in the joint crime, is an accomplice, and the punishment can be mitigated, given that the defendant was in a state of intoxication at the time of the crime and subjectively did not want or actively pursue the occurrence of a harmful result, so this is an indirect intentional crime, which is subjectively malignant and dangerous to the person, which is different from the intentional and intentional crime of deliberately driving and attacking people and intentionally endangering public safety,The perpetrator was able to truthfully admit his guilt after the crime and actively compensated the victim for economic losses, and if he showed repentance, he could be given a lighter punishment in accordance with the law.

The Maserati crash into the BMW case was finally sentenced, and the female driver will receive a light sentence, because the beautiful driver did not intentionally hurt people, and they have already paid some compensation to the victim, so they finally received a light sentence.

Although the consequence is "multiple deaths", from the established facts, the female driver did not have a subjective tendency to intentionally injure, so she cannot be sentenced to death as an "intentional homicide case". For this kind of rich girl, being sentenced to life imprisonment is no different from life than death.

The final result of the Maserati collision with BMW case was that the defendant Tan Mingming was sentenced to life imprisonment and deprived of political rights for life; Defendant Liu Songtao was sentenced to three years imprisonment with a three-year probation; Defendant Zhang Xiaoqu was sentenced to three years imprisonment, suspended for three years.

The explanation given by the court, for Tan Mingming, who was the main responsible person in this case, was sentenced to life instead of the death penalty was that Tan Mingming was able to truthfully confess his crime after arriving at the case, that he confessed, that he actively compensated the victim's economic losses, and that he showed remorse, and that he could be given a lighter punishment as appropriate in accordance with the law.

The Maserati crash into the BMW case was finally sentenced, and the female driver would receive a light sentence because she took the initiative to turn herself in, had a very good attitude, and won the understanding of the other party's family.

The Maserati crash into the BMW case was finally announced, and the female driver would receive a light sentence because the person showed signs of remorse, and at the same time compensated the other party for the corresponding economic losses.

The Maserati crash into the BMW case was finally announced, and the reason why the female driver was given a light sentence is that the state has strict requirements for the death penalty, and the female driver will perform better and be willing to investigate the victim's family, so the sentence will be light.

At present, the three defendants and the three injured parties have reached a compensation agreement on the civil part of the case, the injured Wang Jiaotong will receive more than 600 yuan in compensation, and the families of the two deceased will each receive more than 200 yuan in compensation. Private coordination is one of the grounds for a lenient sentence in the court.

I think the most important reason is that the victims accepted their reconciliation and the victims' families did not hold them accountable, so they received a light sentence.

The female driver was convicted of endangering public safety by dangerous means, but was given a light sentence of life imprisonment because of her repentance.

To be honest, we have been following up on this matter for a long time, and in the end, we can only accept such a result, after all, it is based on the results of careful investigation by relevant departments.

I think the Maserati female driver, who hit and killed 2 people and destroyed 2 families, is too light to be sentenced to life imprisonment.

In fact, such a judgment can reflect the progress and comprehensiveness of China's legal system.

Since the case, all the ** and the audience have been staring at this case, and even conspiracy theories have started on the Internet, and words such as what money can do whatever they want have begun to become ideas that many people agree with. One can imagine the pressure on the judges who hear cases.

Fortunately, after more than a year of sorting out and collecting evidence, there was finally a result, although he was not sentenced to death as many people imagined, but this is actually because the first defendant surrendered as soon as possible after the incident, and actively cooperated with all the acts, which is an act that can reduce the sentence in the law, so in the end, he was sentenced to life imprisonment, which is completely in line with the law, and there is no conspiracy theory.

It's not fair. It really makes me angry that something of this size, and that it has led to so many deaths, that there is no death penalty.

The punishment was not severe enough, because after all, the deceased was an innocent passerby, which was unfair to the family of the deceased.

I think the outcome of this case is very appropriate, because the seriously injured person is still lying in the hospital, which is the best explanation.

Personally, I think it's legitimate, after all, it's still very young. The State should appropriately reduce the death penalty. In the incident, she violated the law because she was afraid of escaping, and then made a big mistake. But the perpetrators did not intend to kill people. So she should be given a chance to live.

The sentence was a bit light. This woman can be sentenced to death, because she has committed a serious traffic accident and is very arrogant afterwards.

Regarding the life sentence of the driver of the Maserati collision with the BMW, I think the sentence is a bit light, because the consequences are very serious.

I think this is a very popular verdict that gives a disgrace to those who ignore the law.

Since the sentence of life imprisonment is given, all medical expenses of the injured person, that is, the victim in the hospital**, should be paid by the victim.

I think it is reasonable, the Son of Heaven should be guilty of the same crime as the common people when he makes mistakes, and if he makes mistakes, he will be punished accordingly.

I think the reason for the delay in the verdict of the Maserati incident is that the victim's family has not accepted all kinds of compensation, and the Maserati victim has not expressed a very sincere attitude, and only wants to use money to understand**.

The Maserati incident was a vicious homicide that separated the victim's family, which was even worse for the average family. After the Maserati incident, many times**, the families of the victims said that they would not accept any compensation and only demanded the death penalty for the perpetrators, which is understandable.

The Maserati incident is an incident of malicious injury to public property, and the ordinary scraping incident caused by the other party's drunk driving is directly handled by the traffic police, and nothing that endangers life occurs. However, the owner of the car was more arrogant, and drove into someone under the premise of unsuccessful negotiation, resulting in one serious injury and one death. There is actually a reason why the victim must ask the perpetrator to give a heavy sentence and is unwilling to forgive no matter how much compensation is paid.

After the incident, the owner of the Maserati was extremely arrogant, and once threatened to spend 10 million yuan to fight the lawsuit, and I would not pay a penny, which caused the victim's family to be angry. Now, after multi-party mediation in the court, the owner of the Maserati is willing to pay more than 4 million yuan in compensation to settle the matter, but the victim's family unanimously asks not to pay a penny, as long as the owner is sentenced heavily. This may be what the ancients said, don't steam steamed buns to fight for breath.

For such a vicious public injury accident, I think it should also be sentenced heavily, if money can solve all problems, then what is the law to do? For a wealthy family, it may be possible to lose a few months of income, but for an ordinary family, no amount of money can be resolved by the loss of a loved one, which is why the victim's family must insist on not forgiving the owner of the Maserati.

Now the two sides are deadlocked, and there is no way to enforce the law. I hope this incident can serve as a wake-up call for the general public, and it is not possible to do whatever you want if you have money.