The Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development has explicitly ordered that rents cannot be unil

In today's rental market, landlords have no control over how much they rent their homes. How high or low the rent of a house above the rental market can be is completely controlled by the intermediaries in the market, who have the ability to regulate the rental of houses in an area. They have in their hands the rental housing information of almost all landlords in this area, and most of the ways to rent a house are through them, so as long as the various real estate agents communicate with each other, the ** of the rental market will change.

The Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development has explicitly ordered that rents cannot be unilaterally raised or lowered, and landlords will definitely listen, because landlords do not want their own houses, but they want the housing market to be stable. Next, let's take a look at the landlord who can do the rent of the house.

First, the formulation of housing rent is based on the market given by intermediaries**In the Internet information age, if you want to rent your own house, then you will go online to check the housing rental in your area**What is the approximate situation. The information you can see on the Internet is basically posted by the real estate agency on the Internet, and it is rare to see the landlord send it, because the online platform will not push the information sent by the landlord. So the ** you refer to is what the real estate agent gives you.

Second, the rise and fall of the house rent, the landlord can only be raised during the lease renewal or lease period, if the landlord does not rely on the reference price given to you by the housing agent, set your own house**, then you can only be lower than the reference price, otherwise the housing agent and the online platform will not, push your housing information, you can only rent it all the time, because the tenant can not see your housing information at all. You can only accept the advice given to you by the agent, and then rent out your own house, and only during the tenant's lease renewal or lease period can you propose a price increase or decrease for the tenant.

Third, the rental market is basically controlled by intermediaries and custodian companies, and the current housing intermediaries have basically formed a consortium, which does not seem to be an intermediary agency, but in fact belongs to the same platform, which is also an indirect monopoly behavior. A market that has been monopolized, and landlords simply can't control house prices. Therefore, the things ordered by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development actually have no actual relationship with the landlord.

Hard! After all, no one can get along with money! As the saying goes, go with the market, sit on the ground and start the price! Such things abound, and as a renter, of course, the cheaper the better!

I think I will listen, after all, the current landlord is still very good, and he has to abide by the rules of the market.

No, after all, the landlord is actually a businessman, and it is impossible to do such a thing that is not good for him.

The houses in the first-tier cities are in the hands of the second and third landlords, and whether to raise the price depends on the ideas of the second- and third-hand landlords. Someone was contracted.

This is an interesting **, in fact, this is the case in our country, and even, in the course of some court cases, this situation exists, and there are many examples. But a small number of cases have been corrected by the High Court.

My personal understanding of the document issued by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development is that the transfer and leasing of property rights are based on the current domestic status quo and involve the people's livelihood of Cathay Pacific. The Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development issued a document to stabilize the stability of the current housing rental market, and second, to provide judicial support for housing rental cases.

1. Personally, I think that as long as the house price does not stop, the housing lease is inevitable, and it is not a paper regulation or document that can be solved.

2. There is a provision in the Contract Law that if one of the parties unilaterally breaches the contract, the breaching party shall bear the liability for breach of contract. When the court hears the case, as long as the breaching party bears the liability for breach of contract, the court will rule that the contractual relationship is terminated. However, the Contract Law does not stipulate that the contractual relationship must be terminated as long as the breaching party bears the liability for breach of contract.

Although the document issued by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development is only a departmental regulation, it has legal effect if it does not conflict with the law.

Legal, but reasonable.

You can also sell a house at will, let alone rent it. A policy is a policy, and there are many ways to actually implement it, such as the lessor can sweep the tenant out of the house by assuming the liability for breach of contract. In addition, most of the current leasing situations are private leases, unregistered or unpaid, and there are many loopholes, so there are more places to operate.