Is there any scientific basis for Einstein s belief that our world does not exist?

Because in many ways, it can be proven that our world does not exist, whether it is from Buddhism.

From a microscopic point of view, our world belongs to one atom. It doesn't exist.

Einstein. The genius physicist of the 20th century, many theories put forward have opened the door to physics, and people read him as popular and hotly discussed as any popular traffic star. Until now, Albert Einstein is also a figure that people are very curious about, and there is also a Hawking who turned out to be born.

helped him share some firepower, otherwise people would have to pick up what he eats every day. Albert Einstein also said a lot about the assumptions of the universe and human beings, one of which was "our world does not exist", what does this mean, and is there any scientific basis for this?

There is a well-known saying in Buddhism that "one leaf and one Bodhi, one sand and one world". To us, sand is a very ordinary, tiny inanimate object, but under the microscope it is also a small world of its own.

There are various fossils of different shapes inside, which look very much like galaxies.

In the process of research, physics discovered that after the atom was magnified, there was another universe in it.

The structure of microscopic particles and the structure of the universe as we know it.

There are striking similarities. Therefore, some people think that the universe we live in is very likely to be a microcosm, maybe the place where we live is a grain of sand, and there is a corresponding behemoth outside of us, in other words, for that unknown creature, our world does not exist.

As we all know, we live in three-dimensional space.

There are only three dimensions that we can reach. But according to the theory, the universe has 11 dimensions, and the others are not yet accessible with our current level of research, but not being able to reach it does not mean that it does not exist. This means that the world we see in ordinary times is not necessarily the real world, because what we see, learn, and physiology do not allow us to see the real world.

The concepts of microcosm and macrocosm are not absolute, and by extension, the universe we live in may be just a smaller fossil in the sand, and there are many more unknown creatures around us. What we see so far is most likely a distorted world that our brains have dealt with.

In general, our world will not be a real world, however the concept of micro and macro perspectives is not absolute. The world we exist in can be a distorted world.

There is no scientific basis. The world is material and objectively exists, and not everything that scientists say makes sense, and it is necessary to have their own judgment.

I don't think there is such a scientific basis, and I hope that everyone will believe in science, and I don't want to believe this statement.

What exactly is the nature of the real world? Why did Albert Einstein say that the world does not exist?

You can also think of the universe as a movie, and you are one of them.

1. Smoke detector.

Since the nucleus of americium is unstable, once it splits, the mass seems to disappear somewhat, as the mass of the fragments is smaller than the original nucleus. In fact, the mass of the americium atom does not disappear at all. This is what Albert Einstein told us.

2. Flat roads.

In Einstein's Ph.D., new methods for measuring molecules in different solutions were introduced, and these methods later became the basic methods of colloidal chemistry. When building roads, building materials engineers use the results of his research to erect fibers.

3. Computer monitors.

In a short split second, electrons are emitted from the cathode of the picture tube, as if they have gained energy during the gallop and accumulated on the display——— which is exactly in line with Einstein's special theory of relativity. The engineer who invented the computer monitor had to make the display conform to the "relativistic effect", otherwise the magnet that controls the flying electrons will create a blurry image on the display, making it impossible for you to work, and of course, you won't be able to play a great computer game.

4. Precise laser.

The barcode of each item also benefits from Einstein's laser theory, and only a laser can accurately read the code in the barcode.

5. Solar cells.

Photocells can convert solar energy into electricity, and Einstein correctly analyzed this conversion principle for the first time in an article published 90 years ago.

He discovered that photons have energy. Certain photons carry enough energy to overcome the "stickiness" that concentrates electrons on a certain metal, which is known as the photoelectric effect.

6. Digital camera.

Photons flying in from the lens squeeze electrons out of the semiconductor, which also makes use of the valuable photoelectric effect. <

7. Medications. Many drugs are made thanks to Einstein's article on Brownian motion.

The British botanist Robert Brown was the first to observe that the particulate eggplant in a suspended liquid is forever in an irregular motion. Albert Einstein used Brownian motion to create a statistical method that linked micro and macro quantities.

8. Global Positioning System.

GPS (Global Positioning System) can help you get in touch with searchers. Albert Einstein discovered 100 years ago that the traditional concept of time is not sufficient if you want to think about multiple events in different places together.

It is no exaggeration to say that the inventions and creations derived from the scientific theories founded by Einstein cover almost every corner of modern civilization. Computer games, buses, digital cameras, ......Every detail of our food, clothing, housing and transportation has the shadow of Einstein.

Albert Einstein said: "Philosophy can be regarded as the mother of all sciences", which shows that philosophy has guiding significance for the study of natural sciences.

The guiding role of philosophy in the natural sciences has a positive impact on the natural sciences. Here"Guidance"It means to help, to inspire, to serve. Engels noted"Our view of history is, first and foremost, a guide for the conduct of research, not a method of structuring a system in the manner of the Hegelians"。

Dialectics is the most important form of thinking for the natural sciences, because it alone can provide analogies and thus explanatory methods for the processes of development that take place in nature, for the universal connections in nature, for the transition from one field of study to another"

In fact, there is one area in which philosophy guides the natural sciences, which is mainly focused on:

1) At the basic frontier of various natural sciences.

This is because at the forefront of science, where the situation is more complex, there are many problems, and various points of view are fiercely debated, and philosophy can provide new ideas for exploring the blind speed.

2) A period of creation of new fields of study and new disciplines.

In many academic judgments, especially in the establishment stage of some comprehensive, cross-sectional, and interdisciplinary disciplines, it is often another philosophical process.

3) In times of crisis in the development of science.

Kuhn concludes on the basis of his study of the history of science:"Especially in times of recognized crisis, scientists must turn to philosophical analysis as a tool to unravel the mysteries of their field"。

Human beings may live in a virtual program, every time at night, the stars twinkle, there should be many people who like the beauty of the sky very much, may be when watching, everyone will also think about a question, that is, we human beings are unique in the universe, if there is life, what kind of light will they exist in, our human scientists have been exploring the process of life, of course, in this process has also encountered a lot of problems. Even so, no trace of extraterrestrial life has been found, is it the same as Einstein said, the universe is inherently false.

First, there have been people who have speculated on this issue more than once beforeA long time ago, someone once said that human beings may live in a virtual program, and now what we humans can see is what people who know this program want us to see, and every technological development of human beings is in a version update, just like the games we usually see, according to the current stage, it is not possible to show that there is really such a developed civilization in the universe, or to know that our difficult all creatures are just relatively strong in science and technology. They know that out we are giving us life.

Second, you may be for those advanced beingsThe area where we humans live is only a very small area, and it is very likely that alien civilizations have locked humans up for experiments. The reason why Einstein thought this way is not unreasonable, the more he understands, the more he guesses, the more fear he will have.

3. What we should do nowIt is not to doubt whether the universe is real, in fact, it is not directly related to the ultimate purpose of human beings, rather than thinking about this, it is better to spend more time on scientific and technological research, which will be more effective for human beings. To the universe, we really seem very small. Although we live in an unknown universe, we still have no way to ask many questions about the universe, the most important of which is whether our real cosmic village does not exist.

The universe is real, and the vast universe should be boundless, endless, beginningless, and infinite. The universe already contains everything, and there is no question of internal or external, origin and extinction at all.

The universe is real, and our science and technology are becoming more and more advanced, and they are further demonstrating to us the real existence of the universe.

I think it's a real thing, otherwise we wouldn't be able to live on Earth, and we wouldn't be able to study other planets.

Answer]: C Philosophy is based on concrete science, which is an abstraction and generalization of the commonality of concrete science, not a collection of all sciences. Therefore, C.