What are the characteristics of Chen Shou s Three Kingdoms ?

Chen Shou's "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" has three characteristics: concise writing, vivid notes, and subjective assumptions. The biggest advantage of "Three Kingdoms" is that it is "concise and vivid", and there are also some precious historical materials.

Its biggest disadvantage is that it selects characters and events according to Confucianism and the author's assumptions, and some historical records do not conform to reality, such as taking the Wei and Jin dynasties as orthodox and Wu Shu as vassals; Another example is that Guo Jia is the first military strategist of the Three Kingdoms and the first military division of Cao Cao, but in order to be too high for Cao Cao, Kong Ming, and Lu Xun, he focuses on shaping Cao Cao, Kong Ming, and Lu Xun, and takes away the subjective will.

First of all, Chen Shou is not a gentleman, he is just a talented historian.

Most of the Three Kingdoms written by Chen Shou are still credible, but there are also undesirable points in them. For example, the Three Kingdoms respected Wei and Jin as orthodox. Although this is inevitable, historians are critical of it.

2 Chen Shou, there is a legend that he has a bad character and asks for bribes. Although it is impossible to verify the historical facts, it is biased that he does evaluate historical figures according to his own preferences in his book!

3. There are contradictions between the book and other historical books of the same era, and it is impossible to verify the authenticity. (e.g. Cao Pidian).

4 Chen Shou's father was Ma Tan's army, Ma Tan was killed by Zhuge Liang, and his father was affected by this. Therefore, Chen Shou hyped his preferences in the book, which did not conform to the facts, so the things about Zhuge Liang recorded were not credible. (There are historical records that Zhuge Liang has clear rewards and punishments, is cautious in his use of soldiers, and has many tricks.)

And Chen Shou wrote that Zhuge Liang was reluctant in internal affairs, military average, and had no adaptability, and said that Zhuge Jin was good at nothing but calligraphy and painting, which is obviously contradictory. So historians are skeptical. thinks that what Chen Shou said is not credible.

To sum up: most of the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is in line with history, and it is one of the rare more objective and true history books, and it is listed as the four histories. However, in the end, it is inevitable that there will be a mixture of personal likes and dislikes, and it should not be fully believed.

Not necessarily. Historical records are written by people, and there may be various factors in them, so they are not absolutely credible and should be viewed dialectically.

It is credible that "Three Kingdoms" is a relatively authoritative historical record, and many historians are indispensable to refer to "Three Kingdoms".

Believable. The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is a very authoritative book that can be trusted and referenced by many historians.

Chen Shou admired Zhuge Liang in the "Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms", and spoke highly of Zhuge Liang's life's achievements and his spirit of "doing his best, and then dying", but he did not shy away from the loss of the street pavilion and "will be slightly not his strength", etc., not only to write with personal feelings, but also to promote his goodness without causing shortages. For Cao Cao's description, he coerced the Han Dynasty to dedicate the emperor to move the capital to Xuchang, and he used historical pens to point out that it was Dong Zhuo and others who came up with the idea, and described the true process of Cao Cao being appointed as the Duke of Wei and the King of Wei. However, the description of Sima Yi's involvement in the Wei Dynasty of the Chan Dynasty only uses the words "like the story of the Han and Wei dynasties" in the Book of Wei, which is enough to make people think deeply.

Since Chen Shou wrote the Book of Wei and Wei Luo in accordance with Sima Yi's intentions, there are also some inaccuracies in the individual accounts in the book, such as falsely claiming that Cao Shuang had a "kingless heart" and so on. The "Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms" also attributed the establishment of the Three Kingdoms and the defeat of Shu Han to the great fate, and to a certain extent, promoted the view of divine power of the emperor. In addition, Chen Shou served as the Zhongzheng official of Ba County, and this habit of judging characters has also influenced the values of the characters in the "Three Kingdoms" to some extent, such as the depiction of historical figures focusing on their talents and courage.

It's not credible, whoever gives more money will write better.

The annotation for Chen Shou's "Three Kingdoms Min Heng Zhi Zhi" is ().

a.Liu Xiaobiao.

b.Pei Songzhi.

c.Li Daoyuan.

d.Wang Cang. Masabashi Kazuki Kei answered accurately: B