Garnett and Duncan are fully compared

Duncan. The stats are that Garnett has the advantage, but there is moisture, because he has unlimited shots, and he single-handedly limits the play of his teammates (which is fine when it comes to the Celtics). Garnett's all-around horror is true, but Duncan's three-point difference, can you find his shortcomings?

Not to mention that he can also hit three-pointers in crunch time (not just against the Suns). Duncan has a quasi-quadruple-double, and Garnett's triple-double is rare. Duncan was O'Neal's only opponent in his prime.

Duncan can defend Garnett alone, Garnett can't defend Duncan. Duncan has better leadership, key ball handling, and consistency than Garnett. A lot of people say Duncan has better teammates, but that's because Duncan can make teammates better, Garnett can't.

Garnett also had good teammates, but ended up winning championships before going to the Celtics? Individual honors Duncan has an absolute advantage, and he has not yet retired and is already recognized as the No. 1 forward in history.

Downstairs, don't talk nonsense, Duncan's winning percentage with the Spurs for so many years is the first of the four major leagues in the United States. That's right, Garnett hasn't made the playoffs in several years and has been in the first round for seven years in a row.

Garnett's speed, footwork, and bounce are all stronger than Duncan's. But Duncan has more power than Garnett, and his sense of passing the ball is also better than Garnett! Duncan is more suitable for the overall style of play of the whole team, and basketball is an overall sport, so I think Duncan is stronger!

Do you want to think about whether the Spurs can win a championship if Garnett comes in for Duncan.

Hehe, I also support kg is better than all-round, it's definitely Garnett, but I've always said that Duncan is the league's No. 1 power forward, and he's better than kg is honor, and he has more rings.

Garnett is super versatile...

Duncan can only win the championship.

Garnett is the first in the league in efficiency, and has been in the first round of the playoffs for n consecutive years.

Duncan's efficiency is average, and his record is average, always the standard of 50 wins and 20+10.

All that has is to give Spurs the fourth-place all-time 4 titles.

It's basically the same as LS, but Garnett's personal ability is stronger than Duncan's, LS, do you think about throwing Duncan to the Timberwolves and he can make the playoffs?

I think if the singles kg is stronger than Shi Fo, the Timberwolves' record before arriving in Boston is a problem for the other players, otherwise how can kg wear a ring in the first year of Kai Duncan is suitable for the team.

Garnett and Duncan data comparison.

Garnett finished blowing up without explaining.