-
Anonymous users2024-02-06Hehe, I also had an English debate at the beginning, and it was a very colorful experience and a very unforgettable memory......
1 The pharmacology, efficacy, and potency of traditional Chinese medicine are empirical, while Western medicine is supported by strict molecular, cytological, and microbiological theories.
2 The curative effect of Chinese medicine is relatively slow and the course of treatment is relatively long, so you may wish to cite some emergencies (pneumothorax, myocardial infarction, cerebral hemorrhage) and ask the other party, how to treat them with Chinese medicine?
3 Forcing the other party to give an example, is there a disease in the world that can be cured by Chinese medicine but not by Western medicine? And you want to give an example, which diseases can be cured by Western medicine but not by Chinese medicine?
4. The destruction of rare wild animals and plants by traditional Chinese medicine (ginseng, deer antler, tiger bone, bear's paw, musk), of course, the other party will definitely cite the chemical pollution of the environment by Western medicine;
5. The other party will definitely talk about side-effect, you must check the information more and be prepared;
7. Do not blindly deny Chinese medicine, but affirm the nourishing effect of Chinese medicine; But in the end, it should be emphasized: Chinese medicine is good, Western medicine is better.
What school are you from? If you are a junior brother or sister, then I will give you a few more tricks ......
-
Anonymous users2024-02-05Today, the other party first told you that freedom is not unrestricted freedom, so we should use the network real-name system to limit the current unrestricted freedom of the Internet. However, once the real-name system is enforced, the majority of online names will no longer even have the freedom to choose, so how can we talk about limited freedom or unlimited freedom? What's more, does online anonymity mean unlimited freedom?
The other classmate also told us that as long as the real-name system is implemented in the background, the fact that the real-name system on the Internet does infringe on people's freedom of speech can be solved. What's more, if a person does not break the law, what is there to fear from the law? Therefore, we should implement the online real-name system.
But in real life, the Resident ID Card Law stipulates that only under special circumstances can the resident ID card be viewed, but once the online real-name system is implemented, it means that no matter whether a person has committed a crime or has a tendency to commit a crime, he must show his ID card before he can carry out online activities, isn't this not an infringement of people's freedom of speech, or even freedom of life?
Throughout the debate, the students on the other side were asking us this question: The online real-name system is good, why don't we implement it? We have never denied the merits of the online real-name system, especially its own merits, but we should also realize that the online real-name system is only one of the many ways to solve network problems.
If we had more means and those means had more merit, would the online real-name system still be desirable? Should it still be practiced? It's like, a fire, a glass of water can extinguish it, but the other classmate, you have to dig up the entire river embankment to put out the fire, and then it may indeed be extinguished, but I estimate that countless people died.
Let's take a look at the merits of the real-name system, whether it is the back-end real-name system or the front-end real-name system that the other party said today, it just makes it faster for network managers to find people. However, is it advisable to ask the majority of netizens to give up their right to free speech just to take care of the convenience of managers? If the United States can change the entire highway plan for the sake of a private house, why can't China improve its own network supervision level for the rights of more than 100 million screen names?
The people can go to great lengths for the sake of the country, but why should the state deprive citizens of their private rights for the sake of its own stronger public power?
In fact, in the final analysis, the online real-name system is a kind of monitoring of netizens. Let's see, who do we need to monitor in real life? There are no more than two kinds, criminals, and criminal suspects.
Could it be that all of us netizens here, all of you, are less trustworthy than criminals?
-
Anonymous users2024-02-04Because the online real-name system will expose you.
Nowadays, "generalists" are more important than "specialists" in society.
Hehe, it's a debate and debate Although what the first floor says makes sense, the point of view is not clear, and it is stirring up mud. >>>More
First of all, you are not biased, everyone is discussing an issue and you can always be the one to reduce the issue to neutrality, which is a good debating quality in itself. >>>More
Debate: Good intentions must be rewarded;
First of all, I don't really appreciate this debate, the concept of good intentions, good retribution is empty, and there is no obvious opposition and inevitability. For example, marrying Fan Bingbing as his wife, some people think this kind of thing is a good thing, some people think it is a bad thing, whether "retribution" is a "good retribution" is too subjective, a bit like "the emperor hates eating meat, so he punishes the prisoner to eat meat". But on the basis of acknowledging the debate: >>>More
Do you want to help others? I believe that it is everyone's obligation to help others. There are people who see others in trouble but turn a blind eye. They also said eloquently: "What does it matter to me if others are in trouble?" I don't know him. ” >>>More