Urgent furniture enterprise debate competition positive side adhere to the company s principles, int

Hehe, it's a debate and debate Although what the first floor says makes sense, the point of view is not clear, and it is stirring up mud.

Regardless of the pros and cons, the first thing to do is to establish the "basic logical framework" of the party. Personally, I think:

The best tone of the positive side is: 1. Adhere to the principle of interests, in order to make profits, survive and develop. 2. Only by adhering to the principle of interests can we provide better products and services. Therefore, only a company that adheres to the principle of interests can ultimately ensure the interests of customers.

The best tone of the opposing side is: 1. Put the interests of customers in the first place, in order to win the market in the fierce competition, in order to survive and develop. 2. Put the interests of customers in the first place, and make timely adjustments according to the changes in the market.

Therefore, only by putting the interests of customers first can we ensure the survival and development of the company.

Personally, I think this is the basic bottom line with the least loopholes between the pros and cons.

The landlord may have noticed that the "subject" of this topic is "company". Positive: (company management) to adhere to the company's principles and interests first (the company can survive and develop); Opposite:

The company's operation must (insist) that the interests of customers are supreme (the company can survive and develop). Therefore, no matter which party it is, the ultimate goal is that "only by agreeing with its own point of view can the company survive and develop". If you deviate from that, you digress.

Whoever digresses from the topic will lose the initiative and will easily fall into the trap of the opponent.

Easy topics to touch: 1 discount. (good for the positive side).

The positive side should emphasize that "principle interests" is the bottom line of the company's survival, and the simple image is: the "best-selling" products that have invested in the cost of 1,000 yuan cannot be sold to him at a discount because the customer is only willing to pay 700. "Unsalable goods" are discounted, which belongs to recovering losses, (cheap but not good) customers buy cheap unsalable goods, and the benefits will also be reduced (such as no "three guarantees").

The discount of high-profit products has not harmed the company's "principled interests".

2. Product quality. (in favor of the opposing side).

The opposing side will emphasize that the company "disregards" the interests of customers, and either cuts corners or deliberately**. (Note that they will say "regardless of the interests of the customer", which is off topic).

Hehe, I'm going to work, and I can't finish writing. There is a need to "me."

The question is actually this: whether to focus on the interests of the company or the interests of the customer The focus is on how much these two interests intersect with each other, and it is difficult to say which side they belong to.

1. The interests of the company and the interests of the customer The company and the customer as the two sides of the interaction Only the common interests of both parties can be beneficial to both parties Any unilateral behavior that only cares about their own interests will inevitably bring damage to the other party and ultimately bring damage to themselves Fakes are obvious examples I have not seen a long manufacturer made of fakes, but there are problems with specific subdivisions Such as the purchase price of raw materials, these are obviously the interests of customers or companies, but to provide good products or not to provide long-term warranty Whose interests does this damage? I can't tell, and that's where the focus is.

2. Insist on the supremacy of the interests of the other party This should be used well If the other party is a rookie, you can be killed in seconds What is supremacy Supremacy is to affirm the dominance of one of the many parties But it does not negate the existence value of the rest of the aspects What does it mean? We affirm that the interests of the company are the first, but this does not mean that we want to harm the interests of customers!! So whatever example he says, you can push it up and use it, right?

3 For the Lord, to continue the previous point, since it is proposed, we have to prove what is the Lord? It is in these two interests that we pay more attention to the interests of the company, and then continue to pave the way for reputation, brand, is this considered a corporate interest? Isn't it for the benefit of the company that we provide customers with perfect service!?

Of course, the interests of the company are important, but the premise is to ensure the credibility and image of the premise.

The company should be the first thing to consider, and the interests of the customer are just as important, compared to the company.

This is called life is the company person, death is the company ghost, although this is a bit too exaggerated, but it can reflect the importance of the company.

Hello, sir, service should be based on enterprise benefits from the perspective of enterprise value.

Argument Arguments; The ultimate purpose of a business is to make a profit, this point of view is the point of view that you can not abandon at any time, and it is also the magic weapon for you to outwit, no matter what the other party's point of view is, you have to stick to this point of view, even if they say perceive the customer, experience marketing, etc., but they are still for the final profit and profit.

Debate is about recognizing one's own arguments. Even if everyone thinks it's wrong, you have to insist that he's right!

The main points of the question are as follows:

If the company's interests come first, then how do the company's interests come from?

How can employees protect the company's interests first?

If the interests of employees are not protected, will the interests of the company be protected?

What should I do if my employees have health problems?

If the company does not value the interests of employees, it will not be able to cultivate employees' sense of belonging, and employees will not work hard and leave their jobs, so how can the company find out?

Dialectical materialism holds that matter is an objective reality that does not depend on human consciousness and can be reflected by human consciousness. Whether it is the existence and development of the natural world or the existence and development of human society, they do not depend on human consciousness. This objective reality, which does not depend on human consciousness, is materiality.

The whole world is a material world that objectively exists without relying on human consciousness, and the original nature of the world is matter. Matter has a decisive effect on consciousness. Matter determines consciousness, and consciousness is a reflection of matter.

Therefore, we must first have material resources, that is, we can only consciously pay if we ask for returns.

The positive side should be baibai from the perspective of development.

1.The rat eyes of the anti-square du are said to be light.

2.Emphasizing that development depends on trust, reputation and reputation, and reputation and reputation are the necessary conditions for development.

3.For example, cost priority does not mean not to deceive customers by word of mouth and reputation, but to maximize profits, which is the fundamental purpose of doing business, and it is not possible to run counter to the fundamental purpose.

In response to this, you say: this debate topic is people-oriented and cost-first, and there is a conflict between the two, and there is no point in discussing when the opponent argues that interests are the fundamental purpose, and there is no conflict with people-oriented, and there is no need for people to make a choice, which is off topic.

However, when people and cost priorities come into conflict, we shouldn't be short-sighted, we should think long-term (and then you're going to keep hitting 1.). 2.point of view).

Mobile phone writing copy as incompetent, say some of my opinion okay. 1. Customer service is as the name is du

Righteousness is to serve customers, and naturally take customers first; 2. Customer service is the solution.

DAO solves customer problems and introduces its own products, benefits are the ultimate goal, but it is not a priority factor, and cost priority is not the way to run through it; 3. From the customer's point of view, what we want more is of course to put our problems in the first place and solve the problem of customer service. Of course, giving priority to interests does not mean not considering customers, I think the positive side should grasp a more intimate angle to play, and consider the probability of winning from the perspective of customers.