What kind of people are excluded from small collectives?

In the workplace, if you want to handle interpersonal relationships well, you need to communicate more and communicate more with your colleagues. Because everyone is a mountain, only by building bridges can we reduce conflicts or misunderstandings between people.

Why are many people prone to prejudice against others, not trusting others or unwilling to take the initiative to communicate?

Excluded from the team? Just break three boxes and be respected in the team (3D tree).

The reason is that he is "framed" by himself, and only by taking the initiative to lift the three boxes can you enjoy the happiness of interpersonal communication and build a bridge between people. The three "boxes" are: Knowledge, Emotion, and Thought.

The first is the knowledge box: it refers to the lack of knowledge to communicate with others.

A person's existing knowledge determines the vision of things.

There is a well-known experiment in psychology that "if a newborn kitten grows up in a space with only vertical lines, the cat will not be able to see horizontal lines", if the cat is placed on a square table, it will fall off the table because it sees the horizontal edge of the table.

It's the same with interpersonal communication, if your knowledge is only to learn work skills, then your vision of the problem may only be in terms of how to earn money to support your family, and when others talk about psychology or philosophy, you will be excluded.

Therefore, you have to break out of the existing knowledge framework first, and have time to read more new knowledge.

Excluded from the team? Just break three boxes and be respected in the team (3D tree).

The second is the emotional frame: it refers to the communication with others that is hindered by personal emotional problems.

A person's likes and dislikes determine their attitude towards others.

Some people and new friends have a smile and easy to communicate, but there is nothing to talk to other colleagues, this is because you are emotional, unwilling to accept people who are different from their own interests and hobbies, therefore, it is difficult for others to understand you deeply, when you encounter problems in the company, there are few colleagues who really help you, resulting in you being particularly lonely.

The best thing to do is to break out of your personal emotional box and take the initiative to communicate with others.

Finally, there is the thought box: it refers to the fact that a person has only himself in his heart.

A person's position determines the angle from which they speak.

Some people are prone to fight with others for some minor problems, and even colleagues who often work together have become enemies who do not speak to each other. Such a person only sees that he is right and that others are wrong, resulting in the inability to discuss problems with others.

The way is to sweep away the framework of personal thinking and realize that there is no absolute truth in the world, only relative truth, so that you can understand others, and others can better understand you.

To sum up, communication masters in the workplace generally have good popularity, because they will deliberately remove the obstacles to communication with others, break the knowledge, emotion and thought frames, take the initiative to understand others, and let others better understand themselves.

I think it depends on the environment at the time! Generally speaking, those with poor quality are generally the objects of exclusion! But if you go to a very poor environment, the dormitories are all of poor quality, and there is only one good quality, then the good quality will be excluded and targeted!

If you keep tolerating it, I think the final result is to turn you into a cowardly and timid person, being excluded is not terrible, you have to self-reflect on why, is it your own way of dealing with the world, or do something wrong to make them become like this, or say something wrong, ask clearly, don't do anything bad and don't be afraid of ghosts knocking on the door, learn to refuse, the subject is a kind and honest person, I want to say to you, you have to learn to take care of yourself, make yourself happy, become strong, this society you don't do illegal things is no one will stop you, You first have to convince yourself that you were born alone until you die, and you have to be accompanied by someone when you die, right, there are many people who learn to be lonely and are not good at words, you need to open your heart, even if you change jobs, what should you do? My advice is, be yourself, do your own thing and do it well, ignore other people's feelings, don't think too much, don't be anxious, it's okay to go to the movies alone, go out for a walk, go to a crowded place, talk to strangers, the world is beautiful sometimes, right?

People who are taciturn, have a cold personality, and don't know how to share. (These people don't.)"Human taste", it's normal to be ostracized) only have their own things to do, and they don't see the people in the dormitory collective. For example:

I had to get up at 5 o'clock in the morning, so I filled in a loud alarm clock, and I couldn't wake myself up, affecting my roommate's sleep. I like to go to bed late and turn on the lights to affect my roommates' sleep. When I came back in the middle of the night, I was too loud and unconscious, and I turned on the light, which affected my roommate's sleep.

I left the class first, without waiting for anyone else. Don't participate in the gossip discussion in the dormitory.,Pretend to be high.,No."Human taste"。

Leader, the leader is the highest person in charge of the collective, and the leader contributes the most to the collective. The leader is the one who bears the most pressure, and it is the leader's responsibility if any member of the group has an accident. The leader is also the person who enjoys the most honors, any member of the collective achieves achievements, and the leader can also reap the same honors Generally speaking, as long as the leader achieves the ability to meet the standards, the integrity of character, and the dedication to serve the collective, it is easy to get the love and support of the collective.

Occasionally, leaders with low ability, or bad character, or lazy people will also be excluded or even subverted by the collective. That's why I've given a star to the leader's susceptibility index.

The weak are the ones who hold back the collective, and the weak contribute negatively to the collective. The weak are characterized by poor individual ability, lack of voice in the collective, and lack of prestige. Usually the weak have poor personal ability, which affects themselves at most.

And once it encounters a group competition, the weak person's poor individual ability will directly lead to damage to the collective honor, then the weak person will cause public anger and be excluded. For example, if the whole class participates in a school-level choir competition, and there is a student with a very poor sense of rhythm, and every time he sings half a beat slower than the others, then this student is likely to be ostracized by the group.

Ordinary people are consumers in the collective, and ordinary people's contribution to the collective is 0. Ordinary people do not hold positions, and they do not need to pay extra energy to contribute to the management of the collective, nor do they need to make extra efforts to win glory for the collective honor, and they do not even need to put extra effort into the decision-making and publicity of the core figures. Therefore, ordinary people only need to stay quietly in the collective, enjoy the protection of the collective, and enjoy the services of the leaders and core figures.

However, ordinary people also have their limitations, because they contribute too little to the collective, so correspondingly, the right to speak has become relatively small. For example, as an ordinary person, the spring outing destination I really want to go to is the Nanyue King Tomb Museum, but when the squad leader leads everyone to discuss Yuexiu Park, I must choose to listen to their opinions. Because I know in my heart that I usually contribute too little to the class collective, so when it comes to collective decision-making, I should relinquish some of my voice and follow the opinions of the contributors.

Ordinary people are often large and inconspicuous in the collective, as long as they keep a low profile, follow the arrangement, and don't show their own will too much, it is not easy to attract exclusion.

The core person, the core person is the person who contributes the most to the collective, in addition to the leader. Some of them contribute their energy to help leaders manage the collective, such as class leaders, and some sports committee members contribute their own specialties, emerge in external projects, and win glory for the collective, such as a student who is great at long-distance running, although he is not a class committee, but he wins the gold medal in long-distance running in the campus sports meeting every year to win glory for the whole class, so this kind of fellowship will also be very popular in the collective; Others contribute their popularity to create a relaxed and happy atmosphere for the collective, such as the classmate who likes to make everyone laugh the most, the classmate who loves to organize parties, the classmate who loves to make pork ribs for everyone to eat, and so on. The core characters have the highest contribution and pay the most for the collective, so they are easy to be loved by the collective and rarely excluded.

But the core characters are sometimes easy to distribute, and the two factions are opposed, and the leader of one side may bring his younger brother to crowd out the leader of the other side. Therefore, I have left a star for the exclusion index of the core characters.

Experience it for yourself. N years ago, a native of a second-tier provincial capital city, he has been studying locally, and he has no experience of living in school, so he is a good child, and he is a freshman in the local 1111. Except for me, all of them came to the provincial capital from third- and fourth-tier cities or rural areas, and most of them had the experience of living in schools.

After entering the school, except for me, other people quickly got together and shared various experiences, while I, who had never been to the countryside, never drank, had only read books, liked video games and the Internet, did not play cards, etc., there was no common topic, and the estrangement became more and more obvious. No matter how much I change, I can't fit into their atmosphere.

If it is not premeditated xenophobia, it means that the individual has a reason, found and changed. Otherwise, even if you change places, the same situation will still occur.

He had just arrived at a new unit and accidentally offended an old employee, causing the old employee to gang up and isolate him. When he first arrived, many of the businesses were not skilled, and the old employees made it difficult for him to make trouble for him in various things. The lad's job is hard.

It's not uncommon to encounter setbacks and problems in the workplace, and leaving your job is not the only option in the face of being squeezed out by colleagues. In this case, you can take the following steps to solve the problem:

1.Communicate with colleagues: First, you can try to communicate directly with your colleagues to understand their thoughts and feelings, and tell them how you feel. Through dialogue, you can better understand each other's perspectives and needs, and then come up with solutions to solve problems.

2.Seek help from your leader: If you think your colleague's behavior has crossed the line, you can ask your immediate manager for help and ask her to step in to solve the problem.

Your leader may take steps to protect your interests, such as arranging for a change of guard among colleagues or adjusting work assignments.

3.Self-reflection: When you are ostracized, it is necessary to do self-reflection to see if there is a problem with your own eyes. If there is something that needs to be improved, try to correct it and try to avoid making mistakes again.

Finally, if you've tried the above and still can't fix the problem, leaving your job is also an option. But before making a decision, you need to think deeply about whether this is an opportunity worth giving up, and the risks and challenges you may face if you leave.

There is no need to form a small group when the company goes to work.

Analects of Wei Linggong: "A gentleman is cautious but not fighting, and the group is not a party." ”

1. Be gregarious at work.

1.It's okay not to engage in any small groups, especially premeditated small groups.

This can easily lead to resentment from leaders and others, especially when the small group behaves in a biased manner.

2.Be gregarious.

The gregarious is to have a few chats, but don't form a party and form an overly close but interest relationship.

In modern terms, it is necessary to be full of team spirit and cooperation spirit. It's for better work.

Second, there is soil for forming gangs and factions.

But where great things are achieved, there must be a team, and their respective forces will form a joint force, and then the big things will be done.

All kinds of political parties, all kinds of gangs, all kinds of organizations, all kinds of interest groups, in fact, all came up like this.

Maybe you and a few of your colleagues often play with a single lead, and you are also a faction to outsiders.

Ouyang Xiu of the Northern Song Dynasty wrote a "Theory of Friends", arguing that gentlemen and villains have their own different circles of friends, and it is necessary to distinguish what is a good party and what is a bad party.

3. Do your job well.

Compared with forming a gang, it is more important to do your own job, after all, the company pays you a salary, mainly because of your work ability.

Humans are social animals. Huai Chong pants.

Therefore, it is generally not necessary to have a good grasp of the proportions and nature of the "small group" of the jury group.