The reason for the increase in grain prices, why are food prices not rising?

According to traditional economic theory! The price increase is determined by supply and demand. Today is a time of frequent floods and droughts.

The state has a policy. We will not let the food ** too high, nor will the food ** be too low. In good years, the state buys grain, and in disaster years, the state ** grain.

Balance supply and demand.

But what! Now this theory no longer applies. It can be manipulated. I believe that the country can settle this situation, food, the foundation of the country.

Don't believe it's a natural disaster, which year there is no natural disaster in the United States There have been more natural disasters than this year, and I haven't seen it grow like this, tell you, now people are smart, and they can even fry vegetables The garlic before Have you heard of it, hehe, in fact, you don't need to fry a lot of vegetables at all, it's enough to fry a typical few and real estate, you shouldn't object to China's real estate bubble, hehe, how did this bubble come about? First of all, a group of people buy high-end houses to make the imbalance between supply and demand, ** house price increase and then you think about what kind of house can live in ** house has become a set of 1000w that ordinary will not maintain the original price of 20w then it has to rise to at least 100w The 80w in the middle is a typical bubble It is a price increase that has no reason to speculate on the house. That's just some "icing on the cake", and the same goes for vegetables.

In addition, using **this** to exaggerate the impact of natural disasters is now (attached Once, Wall Street said that Chinese are rich and have to eat 5 meals a day in order to increase the price of rice, pure nonsense, but grain ** is a liter and then rises hehe, do people have the right to speak).

Of course, it's a natural disaster, and this year, the northeast, Hunan, Hubei, and other major grain provinces have successively issued water, and their output has dropped sharply, and supply exceeds demand.

Rice, eggs, and oil are all rising.

Agricultural products continue to rise, and the increase is so large and the scope of coverage has not been encountered for many years. From "garlic you are ruthless", "beans you play" to "ginger you army", it really makes people see the ferocious power of garlic, mung beans, and ginger price increases. Wave after wave of unevenness, food prices have also rushed to join the sequence of rising prices of agricultural products, which has intensified people's worries about agricultural products.

This is evident in supermarkets and wet markets.

The reason for the price increase is detailed:

If the price of grain does not rise, the peasants will not be able to survive.

Everything is going up, but grain is not going up, is it worthy of the vast number of peasants?

Is the increase in food prices caused by farmers? Miss by a mile!

This is because China implements the system of one house per household and one land per household, and the system of public ownership of land.

Each village has a 30-year land use right (including state-owned land and collective land).

The price of grain is strictly controlled by the state, and if the price of grain rises sharply like pork, then it will definitely cause a rush for rice, famine or the will of the people will be shaken, just like the national period and the anti-Japanese period.

Of course, there are practical reasons and objective reasons for the lack of food, but in fact, the main reason is that food, as the most basic guarantee for human survival, must stabilize food prices. Otherwise, if the food is too high, low-income families will starve and freeze, and people will starve to death in plain language.

As a rural person, I think that grain should indeed be, but it should not be in the form of direct food in the market, but should be distributed directly to the bank accounts of farmers who cultivate the land in the form of subsidies.

There are a few key points to note here:

Grain cannot be as direct as pork, but is distributed through agricultural subsidies in the form of feeding;

Food subsidies should be distributed directly to farmers' bank accounts;

Grain subsidies should not be given to every farmer, but to those farmers who actually farm, according to the area of land they actually cultivate.

Since I can remember, rice ** is 7 cents a pound, now more than 20 years have passed, ordinary rice ** is only a little more than 1 yuan, and a lot of mineral water in the market is more than this**, it can only be said that the grain ** is too low, compared with other commodities, the grain ** is too slow, which to a large extent discourages the enthusiasm of ordinary farmers (ordinary contractors) to farm, so it is necessary to raise the grain **.

The crux of the problem is that grain is different from general commodities, it is a necessity, everyone has to eat grain every day, so the ** of grain can not be like pork these commodities, go with the market, but to ensure that every Chinese can afford to eat, for example, if like pork, from the past 3 yuan a catty, ** to today's 30 a catty, **10 times, grain ** also ** 10 times, almost 15 pieces of a catty, then this is incredible, Let's ask a family of 5 people, if you eat 5 catties of rice every day, it will cost 65 yuan a day for food alone, how many families can afford it?

Of course, 10 times is an exaggeration, but even a little bit will greatly increase the living burden of ordinary families, especially those families in rural areas who do not grow food, so the grain cannot be as direct as the price of meat, but should be directly distributed to farmers who grow grain in the form of food subsidies.

Why do we say that it should be distributed directly to farmers who grow food? Because many rural people do not grow grain, and their own fields are even abandoned, if grain subsidies are distributed to these people, it is obviously unfair to those who actually grow food, so it must be distributed to those who actually grow food, so that to a certain extent, more rural people who have abandoned the land can be planted.

In the past, we used to say that the first rich will lead the latter to become rich, but now that the time has come, those who grow grain in the rural areas in a down-to-earth manner do not have a high income, and at this time we should take out a part of the financial income to subsidize these people who grow grain, so that they can also enjoy the dividends brought about by reform and opening up.

Because food is a necessity for the survival of the people, the ** of food will be controlled by the state within a certain range, so the price of food has not risen, and I think that the price of food should not rise.

Our country's grain production is completely enough for everyone to eat for several years, so the price of food has risen at all, and the price of food should not rise, because this represents the responsibility of a country to the people.

Food is the most fundamental issue of people's livelihood, and if the price of food rises, it will affect people's livelihood, so the state has been maintaining the stability of China's food prices, and food should not rise.

The price of raw materials for grain has not risen, so the price of grain has not increased either, and I don't think the price of grain should go up, because if the price of grain rises, many people will not be able to afford to eat.

Because China's grain is very abundant, there is no shortage, and the price should not be raised, and if the price of food rises, it will cause people to panic.

Grain should be on par with the world.

Why do farmers in our country complain about low grain? The essential reason is that China's cultivated land is too scattered and scattered in the hands of too many people, and it is impossible to realize modern mechanical planting and harvesting, resulting in low planting efficiency and inability to compete with international grain.

In order to solve the fundamental problem, it is necessary to reduce the agricultural population and concentrate the cultivated land and reduce the number of people to cultivate it, so that we can increase the peasants' income without raising grain prices.

The current food price is the ** ten years ago, you say the consumption level ten years ago, the current consumption level, say that you can't afford to eat food, a family eats 600 catties of rice a year, a catty of rice plus five cents a catty can not afford to eat, who believes, deceive the ghost, used to be twenty-one catties of beef, now fifty-five catties, those who say that the price should not rise, do the math yourself.

Because the protective price is the price controlled by the state, it will be imported if there is a shortage of rural areas.

If it doesn't rise, we won't sell it, anyway, I don't panic if I have food.

So why import so much.

The main reason is that now the number of farmers has decreased, and because of the epidemic, many people are unable to return to the countryside to farm, disasters have increased, oil has become less, and the climate has deteriorated, so food prices will be **.

Mainly because the epidemic is getting worse now. So a lot of goods have gone up in price. And this year's harvest is exceptionally low. There are also social factors, family factors, and ego factors.

It is mainly determined by the epidemic, social factors, environmental factors, family factors and its own factors. Especially because of the pandemic downturn.

Rising food prices will have a distracting effect on many bright fronts. First of all, food is a basic necessity for human life, and rising prices will increase people's expenses to buy food, bringing greater economic pressure to low-income families and people in poor areas, leading to malnutrition and food security problems. Second, rising food prices can have a positive impact on farmers, encouraging them to increase food production and raise incomes, but they can also lead to over-cultivation of the land and environmental problems.

In addition, food will also affect the global market, especially in developing countries, which may lead to social turmoil, food instability and international pressure. In conclusion, rising food prices have a significant impact on consumers, farmers, and the global economy.

These three reasons are the speculation of grain merchants, the "burning of grain" in Europe and the United States, and the sharp rise in the price of fertilizers. 1. Climate change: Under the situation of global warming and frequent natural disasters, Canada's rapeseed and South America's soybeans, as well as other agricultural products in many places have been affected to varying degrees, resulting in a reduction in grain production.

2. Frequent outbreaks: Frequent epidemics occur around the world, and there are shortages of labor and raw materials in many countries around the world, so the production, processing and transportation costs of food are greatly reduced, which further pushes up food.

3. Russia-Ukraine conflict: Russia and Ukraine are both important wheat and corn growers and exporters in the world (Russia and Ukraine export about 29% of the world's wheat, 19% of the world's corn exports, and other agricultural products and fertilizers also account for a large proportion), since the Russia-Ukraine conflict in February, Ukraine's Black Sea ports have been closed, and the two countries have restricted their own grain exports at the same time, resulting in a short-term surge in international food.