Do you think students with high scores are fair to graduating students?

It's fair, you can come the first time you don't like it!

Personally, I feel that it is not fair, and those who study for two years and those who study for one year take the exam together.

It's fair, it takes a lot of courage to repeat, and who would waste a year's precious time for no reason?

It is fair for anyone to repeat, but if they are admitted and choose to repeat instead of studying, then they will occupy a valuable study place, which is unfair to the candidates of the current year, and they are dishonest people, and they should be disqualified from the college entrance examination for the following year.

There's nothing unfair about it, and the questions in the exam are not exactly the same every year.

There are too many repeaters with high scores who failed in 2018, and if you are also a 2019 freshman, you will understand our hatred for these repeaters.

It's not fair, but some people say that the world is not fair. Revision will make high school juniors enter a vicious circle, fresh graduates can't pass the exam and then review, is this a good thing?

It's not fair, I won't let you repeat it this time.

What's so unfair! This year's repeaters are last year's freshmen! Is it fair for doctoral, master, undergraduate, and junior college students to compete for jobs?!

With the current proportion of the difficulty of the high examination papers, how many points do you think students who have studied hard for three years can improve after repeating a year? Some students let him repeat for three years, and he couldn't get a 211. Repetition is only a chance for those who are gifted but indulge in youth and lose themselves.

After three years of hard work, there is not much room for improvement in the scores of normal students. Taking a step back, it has to be a last resort, who is willing to waste a year of ** time.

Fairness, each according to his ability! If you are a scumbag, if you only take the test for two people, you may be left behind! If you're not convinced, you can also repeat it!

There is no fairness in the world at all, people are born unfair, it is right to face it squarely, and we cannot complain about others and others. You say that it is unfair to you to repeat with high scores, then others say that you have a good family background, you can make up lessons one-on-one, and you have been in the best school district since you were a child

Everyone's learning foundation and psychological expectations are different, and giving others a chance is also giving yourself a chance.

Nothing is absolutely fair in the survival game, and you will know it when you work in the unit, young people have a lot of basic salary, and there are also a lot of people who rise quickly, and the high salary is outstanding.

The Ministry of Education issued a document that from next year, the college entrance examination cannot be repeated.

It's still fair, it's an extra year of effort, money and time, and it should be rewarded.

It doesn't matter, you can't change it casually.

Talk about what is unfair and unfair, think about what repeaters have experienced and what they will experience.

Fair, because everyone can repeat it, and no one won't let you repeat it, as long as you are willing to endure hardship. It's not easy to repeat students, one more year of study, one year older, and one more year of hardship.

I think it's fair because if someone else reads for an extra year, you can read for two more years.

I just reread it the year before last, and I read it last year. What's the matter, you are allowed to pursue your dreams, and I am not allowed to pursue my dreams?

My classmate is repeating and has already gone to class. Thinking that they got up so early and went to bed late was quite hard, the third year of high school came over like this, but I miss the days when I was in a classroom.

Fairness: Anyone can repeat it, and everyone is equal.

Fair, what's so unfair about that. If you don't do well in the college entrance examination next year, you can also choose to repeat it. If it's not for not being admitted to the ideal university, who wants to be tortured for a year!

Very fair. Anyone who is not satisfied with their college entrance examination results can choose to repeat it!

What's unfair? It's fair that you can repeat it. And what about taking the college entrance examination after one year of high school?

Who is this fair to? If you don't repeat some high schools, no one can pass the exam? To whom is it fair?

Unfair to whom? It's not much use in junior high school, it's okay to learn it or not, and it's meaningless to compare or not, who is fair? Unfair to whom?

The cut-off score for repeating will not be higher than that of fresh graduates.

The cut-off score for repeating is the same as for fresh graduates. The repetition of the college entrance examination is to study for another year after the college entrance examination, which usually refers to the fact that the fresh candidates can be admitted to the school they are satisfied with if they are not happy about the chain, and then review their homework for another year to retake the college entrance examination. Repeating is often carried out in the college entrance examination cram school, and there are also students who review at home according to the specific situation.

The college entrance examination is a summary of the academic level of Chinese students in the three years of high school, and repetition is a way to improve the results of the college entrance examination again.

Is it worth repeating a year

1. For the question of whether it is worth repeating for one year in the third year of high school, it mainly depends on the candidate's own. If you are really unwilling and unwilling to compromise, then you can go and repeat your studies for a year, and you will have regrets in the future, and there is nothing worthless. In addition, if the candidate really has a school or a major that interests him, then it is still worth repeating the year for another year.

2. As a person who has come from the college entrance examination, I feel that if the candidate chooses to repeat, he must adhere to his own ideals and ideas. Repeaters have already failed the college entrance examination once, so repeating a year has to bear more pressure than fresh graduates. If candidates choose to repeat their studies for one year, they must have the ability to resist pressure, stick to their ideals, and continue to struggle.

3. If the candidate has a special desire to go to the university, and is mentally prepared, and can focus on one thing, then it is recommended that the candidate repeat. If you want to take the test again just because you didn't do well and don't have any goals for the future, it is recommended not to repeat it, not to say that repeating for a year can't improve your grades, but it doesn't have much practical significance.

4. Because of the expansion of colleges and universities, the admission rate of universities is very high every year, so under normal circumstances, most candidates do not need to repeat, and it is best not to repeat if they can not repeat. A person's future career and development are not determined by a college entrance examination, even if the college entrance examination is not ideal, and he is not admitted to his favorite school, but candidates can still change all this through their own efforts, as long as they are willing, they will definitely succeed.

There will be no difference between the admission score of repeat students and fresh graduates in the college entrance examination.

Military academies and public security, judicial, and armed police academies cannot be approved in advance, and some majors with special requirements do not recruit former students, and the others are absolutely no different! There is no difference in the exam, but there are some differences when choosing a major in the end, not that there is no early approval, and the early approval of the free normal can apply for the examination, but the national defense students and military schools cannot apply.

Repeaters have one more college entrance examination experience, and the others are similar to those of fresh graduates; In terms of mentality, review students are more stressed, and fresh graduates are more likely to perform abnormally; The number of repeat students in the major is restricted; Repeaters are not allowed to enter military schools.

Military academies, defense students and pilots. When applying for military academies and national defense students, they enjoy the same treatment as fresh graduates, and there is no big difference between them and fresh graduates, but they should pay attention to the issue of age, there are individual majors that require age, generally speaking, former students are older than fresh graduates.

Strong Foundation Program Hong Kong and Macao school majors. For these two types of enrollment schools and majors, under normal circumstances, fresh graduates can apply for the examination, but the situation is different every year, and some schools and majors still do not have such restrictions in some years, and they can also choose to apply for the examination, but they must be determined according to the specific enrollment brochure.

Repeaters should not be restricted, in fact, the life of repeaters is also very hard, and they are also under great psychological pressure because of the abnormal performance of the last time.

No, the imperial examinations of literati in all dynasties and dynasties are regardless of age, as long as they are willing, the family allows them to repeat for a few years, this is the right of the people, what is wrong with young people studying and progressing. If you don't let them learn, you're ruining their lives.

I don't think it's possible to do without restrictions. There is no such thing as unfairness, as long as you work hard enough, work hard enough, and have strength, you can succeed in the end.

In fact, what about the unfair treatment of repeaters and this fresh graduate? Well, it's not like this overnight thing, well, this, yes, that's what should be done to this repeater.

Personally, I think that the existence of repeat students is more unfair to fresh graduates, because for those fresh graduates, they have more time to study, and they destroy the "fair competition" of the college entrance examination.

In my hometown of Henan Province, the number of college entrance examinations every year is very large, in recent years, it has also broken through the 1 million candidates, and the number of repeat students has become more and more.

Compared with fresh graduates, repeaters have already experienced a college entrance examination and may become more comfortable when facing another college entrance examination. When I was taking the college entrance examination, I was with a friend of mine, she was a repeat student, and I felt very nervous and insomnia during the college entrance examination days; But I could feel that she was just very calm, and she told me that she had already experienced it once, and that there was nothing to be nervous about, and that she could just play normally during the exam.

As we all know, in the third year of high school, the knowledge of the first two years is reviewed and consolidated, and many college students who choose to repeat are feeling that their grades are not satisfactory or they are not admitted to the ideal school, so they have one more year to review than the fresh graduates, and their mastery of knowledge points is more consolidated.

With the change of the times, more and more people attach more and more importance to education. The college entrance examination is the most convenient way to "change your fate", but this competition is very fierce, many people will lose, and repeating has become the best choice. However, the existence of repeat students has put pressure on many fresh graduates to go on to higher education.

At present, in many provinces, the number of students in the annual college entrance examination may be at most 1 4 students who are repeaters, so that they will seize the educational resources of fresh graduates, and it will also lead to more and more "involution" in the current education, so I think the existence of repeaters is unfair to the survival of the graduates.

Repeaters will affect the fairness of the college entrance examination to a certain extent, because they have more time and energy to face the college entrance examination. Repeaters at the same level have more study time, and many repeaters have experienced more than one college entrance examination, both in terms of experience and experience, and are more experienced than freshmen in the same year. So, this will make repeaters more comfortable in the exam.

This is unfair to other candidates, why is it normal that many people can only face the college entrance examination once, and others have many opportunities to repeat trial and error. So, that's why many schools have stricter requirements for repeaters and a tougher attitude towards repeaters. Because they already enjoy the dividends of being able to repeat the college entrance examination, the requirements for repeaters must be stricter if they want to maintain the same fairness as other candidates.

In this way, the relative fairness in the college entrance examination can be maintained. <>

In fact, there is no real fairness in the world, the college entrance examination is the only exam that most ordinary people can touch that can change their fate. There are no other limiting factors, and everyone is tested only by their own dedication and talent. This is the closest thing to fairness in everyone's life.

After the college entrance examination, we will find that fairness is becoming more and more difficult in life. It's possible that the interviews and exams you face are already scheduled for the exams, and the path you have chosen has already been forefronted. Many people will go faster than you on their own capital.

Therefore, the existence of repeat students is equivalent to cheating in the college entrance examination, we can imagine that a normal person only takes the test once, and they will fail or get a good score. But if the person has taken the test three or four times, and some people have even taken the test more than a dozen times. He already knows the types and routines of the college entrance examination well, is this fair to other fresh graduates?

Therefore, raising the requirements for repeat students is the best protection for all fresh graduates. <>

I think repeat students will not affect the fairness of the college entrance examination, every student has the qualification to learn Sui Min limb practice, can not only use the college entrance examination once to decide their own life, for some students who fail the college entrance examination or their grades are unstable to guess the world, Naliang can give them a second chance, which can also play an important role in their future.

I don't think so, repeaters are also dignified and rely on their own filial piety and pure knowledge to get into the exam and there is no cheating, but because they have an extra year of study, because most of them skillfully divide people to repeat because they did not get the ideal results, I think this does not affect the fairness of the college entrance examination.

I think that repeaters will affect the fairness of the college entrance examination, because repeaters have learned what they have already learned again.

First of all, repeaters of the college entrance examination are treated the same as ordinary fresh graduates on the admission score line. The difference is that some schools and majors restrict non-fresh graduates from filling in. In terms of admission scores, fresh graduates and non-Japanese fresh graduates are treated equally.

Secondly, repeaters of the college entrance examination can also apply for Hong Kong universities and colleges. There is no essential difference between the college entrance examination policy for repeaters and ordinary college entrance examination candidates, and when choosing to apply for the examination, as long as the scores of repeat candidates meet the admission score requirements of the school, college entrance examination repeat candidates can also apply for Hong Kong universities.

Finally, some special colleges and universities will have restrictions on the admission of repeat students in the college entrance examination. Although college entrance examination repeaters and ordinary college entrance examination candidates are not treated too differently, in the admission policies of some colleges and universities, there will also be clear provisions for colleges and universities that do not recruit college entrance examination repeaters, which requires college entrance examination repeat candidates to pay attention to when filling in the voluntary choice of colleges. For example, some military academies, state-called orange stool defense students, and some colleges and universities have clear regulations when admitting students who do not recruit repeat students for the college entrance examination.