Is the water monster a snake dragon A water monster is a fish or a dragon

It's not scientific. It's still the guessing stage, because no one has captured or observed it up close, it's all seen from a distance, and most of them are very vague. However, many legendary water monsters like China have been confirmed to be fake.

It is caused by various natural phenomena, but I don't know if it's really or not. You can check out the classic legends.

No one knows, most water monsters** are filmed from a distance and are blurry. Based on some **, scientists speculate that some of the water monsters may have been snake dragons. There are also some water monsters that resemble super big fish, and some that resemble mammoths, snakes and other animals.

Even some injured animals are not recognized as water monsters when they are asleep.

Plesiosaurs lived from the Triassic to the Late Cretaceous, and now it's long gone.

According to scientific evidence, it is estimated that no one can solve this problem.,Generally no one has seen it.,So it's not known.。。

First of all, such a huge water monster must need a lot of food every day, and the aquatic food reserves of Loch Ness are not very high, at least for water monsters, so these foods cannot meet the needs of water monsters Secondly, let's say they are plesiosaurs, and plesiosaurs are reptiles, and they will surface every once in a while for ventilation, and I think then people should often see scenes of water monsters dedicating themselves Finally, if a species wants to survive and reproduce, Then the number of individuals in the species must be more than 30, but judging from the current situation, it seems that there are far fewer water monsters

This was found in Tianchi, and the gene of the snake Jinsaurus in Tianchi hundreds of millions of years ago has changed, which still needs to be verified by experts to have a clear answer.

There was an American who used a small satellite to photograph it on the Internet, and it seems to be, but I can't tell you all about it.

Not necessarily, many are water monsters.

Now there's no water monster, it doesn't have to be a plesiosaur, it could be something else.

Not necessarily, it varies from country to country.

There are still such animals in the world. There should be a little bit of pedigree.

Personally, I feel that many water monsters are more likely to be fish.

Because they are mammals or reptiles, they need to breathe, and fish can stay in deep water for a long time, and as long as there is enough food and the water is big and deep enough, the fish can grow all the time, and there is nothing strange about some rare individual big fish.

Water monsters, or "sea monsters", refer to aquatic monsters that live in rivers, lakes and seas. Usually unknown mysterious creatures in myths and folklore, such as the "Loch Ness Monster", "Tianchi Monster", "Kraken" and so on.

Scientists believe that at a depth of about 1,000 meters, there are many large unknown creatures in the ocean, ranging from 18 to 20 meters in length, and some believe that they are plesiosaurs that have survived since the time of the dinosaurs.

What may be more disappointing for all monster fans is that there may not actually be any so-called water monsters at all. To date, there is no reliable physical evidence to prove the existence of the water monster.

Needless to say, the water monster was caught, and even the corpse was never found. A foreign appraisal agency once received many samples of the so-called water monster tissue, but after scientific identification, it was found that in fact, all the so-called water monster tissue samples were from known organisms, including the semi-decomposed corpses of whales and sharks, large clumps of slime molds or wood sunk into the water, etc.

It's not as sensitive as the bridge bird's notice, but there are vague ** and eyewitness accounts.

Based on the above evidence, the "water monster" usually has an elongated neck with a small head on it, and sometimes its raised back can be seen, which is very similar to that of plesiosaurs.

Of course, it is also possible that it is another animal of its age, but it does not resemble a known animal. So it was thought that it might be a plesiosaur.

Loch Ness "Monster".

Why do we think of water monsters as plesiosaurs? Because we may see such a strange water monster in a class of cartoons, because the oak is a plesiosaur, he lives in the water, so people will have such an imagination.

Because the Loch Ness Monster was photographed in the shape of a plesiosaur, you can go and check the old **.

It's a dragon, because it's not usually a dragon in the water, so we think about it is generally a dragon

Not necessarily. It tends to be an animal that is not in the animal species.

Water monsters are water monsters Dinosaurs are dinosaurs.