Why was China s national strength much weaker than that of the Soviet Union back then, but Western a

Updated on military 2024-04-21
29 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Marshall and Stilwell both served in the U.S. Army stationed in Tianjin during the Beiyang period. So they all know the situation in China very well. Therefore, during World War II, the U.S. Army was very opposed to excessive aid to China (while the U.S. Navy did not support the strategy of Europe first and then Asia, and advocated vigorous aid to China, and even the Sino-US Cooperation Institute was established by the U.S. Navy in cooperation with China), believing that no matter how much aid was given, it would be thrown into the water.

    The corrupt Chongqing** even used the oil pipeline laid by the United States from India to aid China's gasoline and diesel fuel to the Japanese army in the occupied area and Wang Puppet to do smuggling business. The parallel trading performance of the Kuomintang army made the United States even more oppositional to China. The 1944 defeat of Yuxianggui turned Chiang and the Kuomintang from ST to complete junk stocks in the eyes of the United States.

    On the other hand, the Soviet Union, with the aid of the United States and Britain, became more and more courageous and stronger. From one up limit to another. Naturally, Americans will continue to invest more.

    The Kuomintang is just demolishing the filth. Later, after the defeat of the civil war and being driven out of the mainland, in fact, the United States went bankrupt and liquidated, cut off the flesh and left the market, and sat back and watched the Chinese Communist Party.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    The first is that all the troops were not invested, and they were only small fights in local areas, rather than fighting with all their national strength like World War II; The second is that the Afghan army uses guerrilla tactics that can defeat them but cannot completely eliminate them, so the war can only be protracted; The third is that the equipment is not suitable for mountain operations, and the terrain of Afghanistan is mainly mountainous, while the tactics of the Soviet army are more suitable for fighting in the Eastern European Plain, and they are not adapted to the soil and water in Afghanistan or on the battlefield.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Because the nature of the war between the Soviet Union and Afghanistan was different, the Soviet Union was an invasion of Afghanistan, and this war was not recognized by everyone in the country.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It is because of the terrain of Afghanistan. It's easy to defend and hard to attack. Take the letter that the Soviet Union was very strong, and it was early, but it could not stop the attack of the Afghans. If you want to defeat Alu Min and Fu Khan, you must do it at the right time, in the right place.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    No. Because of the defeat of the Soviet Union at the beginning of the war, Germany recovered a large number of materials and military **, etc., Germany became stronger, and the Soviet Union became weaker, and if the United States did not help the Soviet Union, the Soviet Union was very likely to lose.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Before the Soviet-German war, there was a large gap in land area between the Soviet Union and Germany, and the population was comparable. In terms of land area, especially oil and other natural resources that support the war, Germany is far inferior to the Soviet Union, so the Soviet Union's war potential and comprehensive strength should be higher than Germany's.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    However, if the United States did not help the Soviet Union during World War II, the Soviet Union would definitely not be able to defeat Germany, because Germany was very advanced in research at that time, and the Soviet Union was still in a relatively backward stage at that time.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The Soviet Union was completely able to defeat Germany, and the comprehensive strength and combat power of the Soviet Union at that time were far superior to Germany; Even if the United States did not enter the war, it was only a matter of time before the Soviet Union won Germany.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    After the battle, the Soviet Union only suffered a major defeat in the early stage of World War II, and after adjusting its personnel and using various generals in the later stage, it also achieved a reversal and won several battles.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The answer is yes, the Soviet Union at that time had a large territory and resources from a long stand, and Germany would definitely not be able to hold on. And this batch of supplies can only be said to hasten the end of the war.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The Soviet people should have been able to fight too much, because at that time, if they could win one game against Germany, they would definitely win the second one.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Because at that time, the United States was still a relatively powerful country, and the Soviet Union was only based on the United States, and the United States had quite strong force. **。

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Historically, from the 7th to the 80s, the elite units of the former Soviet Russians were all deployed in the East German-Moscow region, and second-rate troops were deployed.

    DU is deployed on the borders of the three eastern provinces of China on the borders of the three eastern provinces of Warsaw (the whole army was armored in 1964, and China is now only a part of the special divisions and regiments are armored), and China will dispatch 70% of the country's military expenditure to confront almost all the first-class troops (because the army is directly confronted, which the United States and Britain cannot do, which are separated by oceans, so it can barely be regarded as consuming 20% of the military expenditure of Soviet Russia, so China has a pivotal position on the anti-Soviet issue Reform and opening up Only after Hong Kong's return did the West acquiesce and make efforts in the 80s).

    Later, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States did not need this fighter, and China also implemented a sugar-coated policy toward the United States and other countries, constantly sending money and loans, and maintaining a favorable opinion.

    The most advanced ** is the sugar-coated cannonball (developed by our country completely independently) to make Westerners happy The black people in the slums of the United States Drag their families to live in China** will provide loans to the villas Those single mothers use the US Treasury bonds purchased by China to subsidize the ...... of buying household goods in the supermarketMacedonian School Bus Japan is also going to send a delegation to China to discuss the issue of buying government bonds from each other (it is very obvious that China will buy their government bonds) Foreigners already think that China is a big cake Now countries all over the world like China.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    The point is not to know what time you are talking about. If it were the 70s, it would be like there was a visit to China by the United States** Nixon. At that time, it was not a Cold War, divided into two major factions, the Soviet Union and the United States, and some sources say that it was because of Nixon's visit to China that the Soviet Union realized:

    China may be joining forces with the United States, and Sino-Soviet relations began to deteriorate. As for the gods and demons did not join forces to deal with the Soviet Union, it was because the Soviet Union helped China a lot during World War II, and the Chinese called them "big brother of the Soviet Union". In addition, at that time, there was a certain risk of joining forces against the Soviet Union, and if the "cold war" was not handled well, it could turn into a "hot war".

    If this were the case, it would be a global disaster, maybe a third world war, and in fact, Sino-US relations had been developing at that time.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    The essence is different, whether China is socialism or a home that started by learning from the Soviet Union. The United States is capitalist. China wants to call the USSR a big brother, and if it fights the USSR together with the United States, then.

    After all, the USSR helped us, gave us loans, provided ammunition, and the United States would only play soy sauce and watch the excitement.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    In fact, the collapse of the Soviet Union was on the central du

    There is no benefit to the country, and the owner of the building can learn about the dao199+ time,. Why is the long-term economic and political blockade of the United States on returning to our country? Because the old friend or old enemy of the north is gone, the current opponent of the United States is a country with a communist camp!

    Why does 198+ have to listen to Lao Mei? Dragged down our scapegoats,?

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Because China has always been hostile to the United States in its education after 49 years, first of all, it can't turn a corner.

    Americans will never be kind to the common people.

    A few people are the same, but they are still fighting in the nest.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    What a change in the international form.

    If it's in my interest, I'll associate with you.

    There are only interests between countries. Now we have a reason with Pakistan.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    There are no eternal friends, only eternal interests.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    The ideology is different, and the simple point is that the old guard in the country is in power.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    Because the USSR is finished, the United States doesn't need you anymore, understand no.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Because then the Soviet Union collapsed...

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    Military supplies from the United States to aid the Soviet Union during World War II:

    Military supplies include munitions, strategic goods, foodstuffs and machinery and equipment. This includes 14,000 fighters and transport planes of various types, 10,000 military vehicles, 12,000 armored vehicles, 32,000 motorcycles, 13,000 trains, 7,944 artillery pieces of various types, 10,000 submachine guns, as well as explosives, steel, food, and other strategic materials. A total of 16.42 million tons of military supplies worth $11 billion were transported to the Soviet Union.

    In addition, the United States leased 672 ships from the Soviet Union, and after the end of World War II, the Soviet Union returned only 127 ships to the United States. The United States came to the aid of the Soviet Union with such blood, and the Soviet Union, of course, did not refuse to come, and all of them laughed and accepted. Although the number of tanks and artillery supplied by the United States is far less than that produced by the Soviet Union itself, the United States has several pieces of aid, which are indeed very crucial.

    For example, the United States provided 82% of the Soviet Union's production in World War II, and the United States and Britain provided twice as much high-quality aluminum as the Soviet Union.

    Without the aviation aluminum provided by the United States and Britain, the Soviet Union's fighter production would have dropped by 60%, the Soviet Union itself produced 1.81 million tons of aviation fuel, and the United States aided 2.58 million tons of aviation fuel.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    I didn't answer this question, and I don't know why it was on my head. Let's put it this way, without the assistance of the United States, the Soviet Union would not have been able to fight a big counterattack, and the Soviet Union aided by the United States alone had more than twice the domestic production of the Soviet Union during the war. However, if the Soviet Union is not aided, then the Soviet Union will most likely make peace with Germany, and this will have to be ......So, don't put too much emphasis on the aid of the Americans, its aid is for itself.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    From October 1, 1941, to September 20, 1945, the United States provided $10.9 billion worth of supplies to the Soviet Union ($9.8 billion according to the Soviet Union's own statistics). The total supplied to the USSR:

    14,795 aircraft.

    Tanks 7056 units.

    Jeep 51,503 units.

    375883 trucks.

    Motorcycles 35,170 units.

    8071 tractors.

    Artillery 8218 guns.

    Machine gun 131633 strong.

    Explosives 345735 tons.

    Buildings $10,910,000.

    Train car 11155 (knot?) )

    1981 train locomotives.

    90 cargo ships.

    Frigate (anti-submarine) 105 units.

    Torpedo boats 197 units.

    7,784 engines for ships.

    Food supplies 4,478,000 tons.

    Machinery and equipment $1078965000.

    Non-ferrous metals 802,000 tons.

    Oilseeds 2,670,000 tons.

    Chemicals 842,000 tons.

    Cotton 106893000 tons.

    49,869 tons of leather goods.

    Tires 3,786,000 pcs.

    15417001 pairs of military boots.

    The supplies were initially provided under the Lend-Lease Act, but two months later, after the United States entered the war. It becomes aid.

    In addition to airplanes, some of them flew directly from Alaska in the United States to Chukotka in the Soviet Union and then flew outside the interior of the Soviet Union. Most of the supplies were shipped to England or Iceland and then shipped by sea via the Barents Sea to the northern ports of Murmansk and Arkhangelsk in the Soviet Union. Escorted by the Phantom Navy.

    In the past, the Soviet Union barely mentioned these things, or belittled its significance during the day shift. But now Russian researchers admit that after the outbreak of the war in June 1941, the Soviet Union decided to move to the rear and build a new industrial base, and in the nine-month gap between the dismantling of the old industrial areas and the transportation to the Urals and Western Siberia, where they were built and put into operation, the Soviet Red Army, which was losing and retreating, was supported by American aid, and the Moscow Campaign could not have been fought without American aid to the Soviet Union. Moreover, in the process of building new industrial zones in the Urals and Western Siberia, it was the United States that provided the necessary materials and equipment for the construction in accordance with the requirements of the Soviet Union, so that the miracle of building a large-scale industrial base in the primeval forests and steppes in half a year was transmitted.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    It was not aid in the formal sense, it was just arms sales, and at that time the United States also sold arms to Germany, but the content was very small, and it was an open arms sale to the Soviet Union. The United States is taking advantage of its geographical location and the quantity and ability to produce military equipment to achieve an unofficial entry into the war before formally entering the war.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    Germany did not need Japan's help: the situation in the first three months of the Soviet-German war was extremely clear, and the Soviet army was ,.. to collapseWhile the Soviet Union was mobilizing troops from the Far East to defend itself against the German invasion, Japan was busy preparing for an attack on the United States ,..

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    A certain amount of materials was given, and the United States did not want to give high-tech ** to the Soviet Union, and the Soviet Union had a certain industrial capacity, and the steel directly given also supported tanks such as Sherman.

  29. Anonymous users2024-01-11

    You can't beat Germany. Because the aid that has been calculated is easy to calculate, it can also be calculated. But there is one thing that cannot be calculated, and that is morale.

    In ancient times, the generals who defended the city often relied on an empty sentence "Our reinforcements are about to arrive] to inspire the soldiers to resist to the death, because the general's empty words were their hope and their determination to resist to the end. If there is no empty sentence, the hearts of people who have been besieged for a long time will be scattered, and people are not machines, and they will not be obedient until they die. The determination to resist will be shaken, the fighting power will inevitably weaken, and some people will want to flee and some people will want to surrender.

    But if there is such a trend, it is a group of people who think about change. No matter how good the general is, the soldiers are useless, and the people's hearts are scattered.

    And the Soviet Union, from the decision-making level to the soldiers, everyone knows that there is American assistance, and it is indeed visible and tangible, and knows that there will be assistance [such as tank bread, everyone can see and touch it] This is of course very angry, who can calculate this morale? The most crucial key was to motivate the decision-makers of the Soviet Union, not the soldiers who defended the territory. Because of the assistance, the Soviet leadership was more cohesive.

    It was the assistance that allowed the Soviet leadership to think about how to fight it without thinking about other issues. There is only one voice in the country, and that is to resist to the end.

    The two clans fought in a group, the surname De took his own people to the ancestral hall surnamed Su to fight, and saw that there were people of foreign tribes behind the surname Su to help the surname Su hand over **, and the people surnamed De were not panicked?

    Therefore, this morale is one and the other, and both sides are not good for Germany. If there is no American aid, you say whose morale collapses first. If you want to ask how much the United States has aided the Soviet Union, the answer is just one, the will to resist to the end.

Related questions
17 answers2024-04-21

This talented woman from Tsinghua University is very good, and she has made great achievements in research results through her continuous efforts, and she was also invited by the American Academy of Sciences to become a foreign academician.

19 answers2024-04-21

It was easy to conquer, but difficult to rule, and many colonies were not British territory, nor were they English nations. It is not completely controllable by the British, and there is one thing that the British and the Japanese are very similar, that is, the human heart is not enough to swallow the elephant. He will not operate steadily, like Russia, and in 500 years become the largest country in the world in terms of territory. >>>More

13 answers2024-04-21

At that time, the world was divided into three, if Eastern Wu went to attack Shu, then Cao Wei would take the opportunity to attack himself, and if Eastern Wu went to attack Cao Wei, then Shu might attack himselfAlthough Dongwu is stronger than Shu, its strength is not to the extent that it can not only send troops to attack one country, but also the army left in Dongwu can resist another country. >>>More

8 answers2024-04-21

In 1892, the Sino-Japanese War broke out, and China and Japan went to war. Through this war, Japan defeated the self-improvement faction advocated by Kang Youwei, which led to the deepening of the crisis in China's political, economic, and military aspects, and laid the foundation for the weak and sluggish regime of the late Qing Dynasty.

5 answers2024-04-21

I think the biggest reason is that the personalities are incompatible, because two people have different views, even if they can endure it together, they will not be able to persevere sooner or later.