If you want to buy a camera to play, RX100, LX7 ask for recommendations

Updated on number 2024-04-01
4 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Depending on how you play, if you have a fever, the SLR is for sure.

    You pat it casually, I think the RX100 is the best, high-quality pocket machine. The Canon G1X is still a bit big, and the picture quality is not much better than the RX100.

    The two you picked are two of the best consumer non-interchangeable lens machines out there, with the exception of the Fujifilm X100 and Sony RX1.

    There are also several new phones that have not been released, such as Fujifilm X100S, Nikon CoolPix A.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Hello! According to your needs, it is recommended to choose the Sony Black Card RX100.

    The Sony RX100 is undoubtedly the absolute king of cameras that can fit into your pocket, and it is not an exaggeration to call it the king of pockets, both in terms of image quality and control.

    The black card is impeccable in terms of configuration, equipped with high-quality, large-aperture high-quality Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-100mm optical zoom lens, 20.2 million pixels of 1-inch ( CMOS sensor, new BIONZ high-speed image processor, mechanical inter-lens shutter, and the image group configuration is definitely not low. In addition, the display also uses Sony's current highest-spec, 10,000-pixel display with White Magic technology, a powerful anti-shake system, and so on. It can be said that the RX100 is the product that uses the most top-of-the-line technology in Sony's imaging lineup.

    To put it simply, this camera gives us a small DC level of size and close to entry-level mirrorless performance, which is the biggest significance of the Sony black card.

    Pros:1Very compact size It can be easily carried in a pocket.

    2.20.2 million pixels bring a very good resolution performance.

    3.The high-sensitivity performance surpasses that of all current small-form DCs

    4.The maximum aperture is up to.

    5.The image quality of the center of the lens is relatively good.

    6.The four-color screen has a high brightness.

    7.With a mode dial.

    8.With a multi-function runner at the front.

    9.Continuous shooting speed of up to 10 frames per second.

    11.Built-in two-channel microphone.

    12.It has a very complete ** shooting effect.

    Cons: 1The aperture at the telephoto end is on the tight side.

    2.There is no JPEG ultra-fine storage mode.

    3.The number of optional accessories is smaller.

    4.There is no scale on the front control wheel.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    If you have a lot of shots, you can consider the LX7, which has a wider lens

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Clause.

    1. Sensor: RX100 is 1 inch, LX7 is 1 inch, the size of the sensor determines the quality of the picture, RX100 is larger, and the resolution and high sensitivity must be more advantageous.

    Clause. 2. Lens: RX100 is a Carl Zeiss lens, LX7 is a Leica certified lens, LX7 has a wider wide-angle end and a larger aperture throughout the process, but RX100's large sensor can make up for part of the aperture gap, and the RX100 lens is made by Sony and designed by Zeiss and provides technology, and the quality is stronger than the LX7 Leica certified lens.

    Clause. 3. Viewfinder: Both are LED viewfinders, RX100 is an inch of about 1.23 million pixel LCD screen, LX7 is an inch of about 92 pixel LCD screen, RX100 is better and more delicate.

    Generally speaking, RX100 is better than LX7 in terms of portability, operability and image quality, but ** more expensive than LX7 more than a thousand, the camera is a penny, the two are about the same cost performance, depending on your own needs, if you don't care about the price, then buy RX100.

Related questions
18 answers2024-04-01

From some relevant data comparison, Fujifilm J10 is slightly better, and Fujifilm camera is also an old brand. BenQ is mainly based on Hesan computers. Digital cameras have only entered the industry in recent years. >>>More

4 answers2024-04-01

Each brand has different grades of cameras suitable for different consumers, and the launch of many products only shows the brand's ability, not necessarily suitable for consumers. Therefore, there are any brands of cost-effective digital cameras, because everyone's needs are different. If there are thousands of cameras, if there is a cost-effective one, everyone will buy this, can other models still be sold? >>>More

7 answers2024-04-01

I recommend buying Razer.

Razer's mouse is so squeamish. >>>More

8 answers2024-04-01

If you don't change the lens, the first choice is Nikon D3000 and Sony A330, the two sets of heads have high image quality and bright colors, and they can be directly produced without post-production. >>>More

8 answers2024-04-01

First of all, let me tell you, it's absolutely right to choose Canon for digital cameras, and you don't need to look at anything else. >>>More