After living together for 5 years, the man spent 80,000 yuan on the woman, can he come back?

If you don't come back, this belongs to the woman who voluntarily spends money on the man, if the IOU is signed, it must be okay, if there is no IOU, you can't get the money, it belongs to being deceived by the scumbag.

If you can get it back, I think this thing is basically going to come back, and there is no evidence, and it is not a deception, so this thing is basically impossible.

If it is a voluntary and joint expense, it is generally not possible to claim repayment.

If there is a payment voucher or invoice confirming that the money was used for the man's expenses, the woman can get back the money that belongs to her through legal channels if the evidence is sufficient.

As long as there is evidence, it can be returned, and it can be resolved privately first, and if the man does not give it, he can sue to the court.

I don't think it can be given directly, but the living expenses of your together, so do you want to get the 80,000 yuan back, can you give people 5 years of youth?

There is evidence that you can, but the cost of living for 5 years can't be proved to be too piecemeal, don't ask for it, just when you spend money to buy lessons, and then have a long heart.

If the woman retains evidence, of course she can come back.

It depends on how the two parties negotiate whether to borrow or not, if the man and the woman borrow an IOU, they can be resolved by law with evidence.

This has to find the other party to wow.,Even if you don't come back all.,It's a little bit of it.。

It would be better if the woman had proof to spend the money. It's hard to ask for no evidence. What should I do if I meet a scumbag who doesn't admit you.

I think it's still hard to come back, after all, you took the initiative to pay.

See if the woman has a certificate or evidence of regularization, and then note what it is.

If it's a sum of money, there may be a valid reason, if it's not just a loose piece of money, it won't be calculated, and it can only be used as a lesson to change this practice in the future.

The only way to solve the problem is to take the legal route.

If it is a formal loan, and the other party admits the account, it should be possible to get it back through negotiation or litigation.

If it's just the expense of daily life, it can only be regarded as your consumption of flowers and willows.

This kind of expense may also have been incurred by the man, and if both parties are chasing this bad debt, isn't that equivalent to disgusting themselves? ?

It's definitely not going to come back, and I guess the other party won't either. It's really a loss, let's have a snack next time.

During the period of cohabitation, it is impossible for a man and a woman to get their money back, regardless of who spent whom. Unless one party voluntarily gives.

Unlikely, as it is difficult to prove this expense unless it is a debt relationship. Otherwise, it can only be a gift.

The term illegal cohabitation is no longer used, and it can be simply called cohabitation.

The purchase of goods by the husband for the woman during the period of cohabitation is an act of gift, and it is generally not possible to return it. If the value is indeed high, both parties can negotiate to return some of the items. It's a negotiation, and the law doesn't clearly stipulate that it must be necessary.

In addition, the living expenses used in the cohabitation are shared by both parties, and they do not need to be refunded.

No, since it is an illegal cohabitation, it is not going to come back, if you think that the woman cheated you of your money, and there is corresponding evidence to appeal to her, if the amount is not large, I personally think that it is not like this, maybe you are because of hatred, maybe because you hate her deceived you, it is better to listen to the answer first. Men treat women better. Just take it as a temporary meal and grow wise.

Both parties are unmarried, so it is not an illegal cohabitation. As for the period of cohabitation, the general consumption is basically voluntary, so it cannot be returned later; If it is lent by one party to the other, of course, it can be returned later. On the other hand, if one party gives valuable gifts (such as jewelry, jewelry, etc.) to the other party for the purpose of marriage, if the party who gives it to the other party proposes to return it, the other party shall return it to the other party.

In 1994, China abolished illegal cohabitation, that is, cohabitation, broadly speaking, as long as men and women are willing to be together, not to trade money, are cohabitation, in a narrow sense, it refers to the relationship between husband and wife living together, but also cohabitation! It's all okay, it's not illegal cohabitation! In addition to husband and wife, during the period of cohabitation, both the man and the woman must repay the money borrowed from each other, except for automatic gifts!

Whether the expenses incurred during the period of love and cohabitation need to be repaid according to the specific circumstances: (1) If small gifts and small gifts are given to each other during the relationship, and expenses such as cosmetics and meals purchased are generally deemed to be gifts. (2) If there are some payments that the parties expressly agree to borrow, they should be repaid at the time of separation.

3) At the time of breakup, if the valuable jewelry was bought by the other party, it should be returned. This gift is essentially a conditional gift, i.e. a condition for the marriage is attached, and if the conditions are not fulfilled, one party is to return it.

In addition, when the cohabitation relationship is dissolved, the claims and debts formed during the period of cohabitation for the purpose of joint production and living may be treated as joint claims and debts.

It took only a few years to spend 10,000 yuan ......What kind of life is this.

Ah, life below the poverty line, how did you survive? The expenses of living together do not have to be repaid, unless there is an IOU proving that they are not used for the expenses of living together, but for money that is used for other purposes, which is to be repaid. If you don't understand, find a lawyer.

The woman spends 10,000 yuan on the man, as long as the man can provide evidence that the woman took the man's 10,000 yuan to spend, the man can ask the woman to repay. If there is no evidence, don't pursue it.

No matter how you usually use the money, living together for three years, spending 10,000 yuan on the man is not much, no matter what the reason, the man should not ask for this 10,000 yuan, and I personally think that the woman does not need to pay him back. Let's get together and disperse!

You don't have to pay it back, just leave.

There is definite evidence of spending the man's 10,000 yuan, and the man asks the woman to pay it back, then he has to pay it back.

The cohabitation relationship is not husband and wife, if you borrow it, you will pay it back, and you will not pay it back.

The man can call the police because the woman is suspected of fraud.

The main thing is to see how the money is given to the woman? If it's a gift, then you can't get it back, and if you have an IOU or something at the time, it's okay.

The man can get it back, after all, the figure of 100,000 yuan is a bit big, and it is best to have any evidence to prove that the woman took the money, and it will be easy to use it in a lawsuit at that time

If the 100,000 yuan is not a wedding gift, it is something you voluntarily gave to the other party, and there is no IOU or evidence, then it is difficult to get your money back, but if the 100,000 yuan is explained to the other party and their parents, of course you can get it back.

The two parties have not received a marriage certificate and live together, and the woman proposes to break up after the woman takes the man's 100,000 yuan, and the man can get the money back.

The unmarried received a marriage certificate, the two parties lived together, and the woman took 100,000 yuan from the man. The woman proposes to break up, and the man can ask for the money back, because you have not applied for a marriage certificate. If you can't get it, you can sue him in court.

You are obsessed with lust, a woman can cheat money and run away when she gets married, and you will let go of living together.

Without receiving the marriage certificate, the two parties lived together, and the woman proposed to break up after taking the man's 100,000 yuan, and the man could get the money back, because the money was not their joint property, and they were not married, but the money in the south could be returned if the woman wanted it.

This must be a problem.

Personally, I would recommend not falling in love.

Falling in love is always inevitable to spend more, gifts should be given on holidays, gifts should be given on special days, and time should be spent with each other, and at least to play at least at least when you are poor, so you should not fall in love when you are poor, we are not able to give each other a better life, and we cannot give each other material needs.

Although at this time your girlfriend said that she doesn't mind that you don't have money, and doesn't mind what you do, but after a long time, I see other couples showing affection, girls will always be envious, today my roommate and boyfriend went to the movies, and I went to the video game city to play for a long time, and I came back with a lot of dolls, and my boyfriend gave me what lipstick, cosmetics, and bags on my roommate's birthday, at this time your girlfriend will definitely be sad, and she also wants to face this difficult life with you. But if this boy from a better family pursues her, you may be at risk of being green, in this material age, there is no sense of security without money, what we worry about every day, what we do every day is for money, only if we have a better life, can we be qualified to talk about love.

As long as you can provide substantial proof, you should be able to get it back.

The South is right, see how your own affairs are solved? I don't think you can get it back.

It's all voluntary, and she's not married, hehe, I'm so embarrassed to open this mouth, you can ask her, has she been selling for so many years? In the case of selling you give money, but, half? She's not worth the price! This kind of girl is really embarrassed to open this mouth!

They are all voluntary cohabitation, generally not, and the compensation fee can be negotiated by two people.

I think that after the two broke up, they could ask for money to pay off her debts. If she gives, it's better, she doesn't give, and she doesn't have to chatter, just don't have this part of the money.

How does this feel very strange, just like what I saw before, just like the reason why the man gives the woman a lot of gifts when you come to the south and the woman, and when you want to break up, you have to ask for things back. It depends on whether the man is thick-skinned or not. It was changed voluntarily and he was not forced.

It doesn't seem to work, you can consult a lawyer.

Unless you have proof that she is cheating on marriage, you can't go hungry!

There is a girl's body standing there. A young boy has to duel with other boys and win to become a woman, isn't that too much.

No, at most, when you get divorced, you will be judged to be at fault and leave the house.

Normal channels to go: difficult.

Not through normal channels: It's not that hard.

In these three cases, the bride price can be returned.

1) The parties have not gone through the marriage registration formalities. This is a principled provision for the bride price, and the premise is that the marriage has not been concluded and the bride price has been paid.

2) The parties have gone through marriage registration formalities but do not live together. In this case, the man and the woman have fulfilled the necessary legal procedures for marriage and are in accordance with the legal marriage relationship, but the parties are not really living together.

3) Payments made before marriage that cause hardship to the payor. The bride price is the property given to the other party before the marriage, and the amount is generally relatively large, which refers to the situation that the paying party is unable to live after the bride price is paid to the other party.

In view of the above conditions, the first is that after the bride price is paid, before the parties enter into marriage. And for the first.

The provisions of 2.3 stipulate that the parties already have a legal marital relationship, but the divorce of the parties shall be a condition.