China s military problems, China s military intelligence problems.

It's okay to fight at close range, but among the big powers, even if the United States comes, it will not have an absolute advantage, and if it is a long-distance attack on others, it will not work.

And to talk about the latest scientific research technology.

Usually a country, especially a military power, the latest scientific research and technology are kept secret, even if it is created, it will not be announced to the outside world, which is related to politics, ** when he needs to make it public, when he is not needed, he will be temporarily hidden.

China is slightly stronger than Japan, Japan does not have the help of the United States, and China is small to him!

China's overall military strength is the second largest in the world, second only to the United States

It can only be said that China is the first in the world in land warfare!

The latest technology?? ^

Only after buying and improving the "latest technology.""

A regional military power. There is still a long, long way to go from becoming a global military power.

Having one-eighth of the U.S. military spending is already remarkable, and few countries in the world can do that. There are talents, there are capital investment. It is not difficult to tackle technical problems.

They have achieved few results because they did not refer to their own imagination to develop, and China has caught up and surpassed later, and there are lessons from the past, and their knowledge and failures are used as a reference to reduce detours. For example, we have long known what a car looks like, and the development has a good look. They're going to develop something, and they don't know what Zhang is going to be so fast.

China's East China Sea Fleet has more than 30 destroyers of more than 3,000 tons, and among the ships of the East China Sea Fleet, the 8,000-ton Hyundai-class destroyers imported from Russia have the attack power of Sunburn supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles, which are known as the killers of US aircraft carriers.

The long-range S-300F (S-300) is a naval version, the Americans call it SA-N-6, also called "Reeve"-M, the medium-range "Shikili" medium-range ship-to-air missile ** system, the Western designation SA-N-7, the short-range artillery integrated close-in defense system "Chestnut" shipborne artillery combined with the air defense system, "Kashtan" is its export type.

1.No, and it doesn't make any sense. Transportation *** is transport ***, even if it is barely loaded, there is no fire control system like arming***, and it is useless to install it, but it will affect your own transportation task.

2.Of course not, even if the so-called missile Li Attack is left alone after launch, in fact, it can only be ignored when the missile locks onto the target after launch. Our missiles do not yet have the same technical performance as those of the United States, and we can select targets for missiles after launch, or simply have other platforms guide targets to missiles.

As for the correction of the trajectory you said at the end, any missile can do it, and the guidance capability is the basic definition of a missile.

3.No way. The performance of the basic platform determines that it is completely unsuitable for aircraft carriers.

1: No, there is a big difference between armed *** and universal ***, and it is not replaced by installing ** on general ***. Armed *** is stronger than general *** in terms of fire readiness and control, speed, mobility, protection and firepower.

2: Red Arrow 9 is guided by infrared imaging, which can modify the trajectory and achieve "no matter after launch".

3: The Rolling Lift-12 series is too small, and the engine thrust is not enough after adding early warning equipment, and the strength of the fuselage is not enough, so it cannot adapt to the take-off and landing on the ship. Finally, carrier-based fixed-wing early warning aircraft must need a catapult, and the catapult technology in the world is only mastered by the United States, and even Russia can only engage in *** early warning aircraft.

1.The three types of Mi-type missiles can be used, or they can be improved and equipped with tank missiles, but after all, they are universal, and they are not as good as professional Wuzhi in terms of speed protection and attack maneuverability. Wu Zhixian sue 10 is already there.

2.Some models of the Red Arrow 8 are wire-guided, and someone must manipulate the missile through the wire after launch. Most of the Red Arrow 8 models are fire-and-forget after. Red Arrow 9 is launched after the brother takes the Ming Ming.

3.The Y-12 is a land-based light aircraft, and the strength of the aircraft hull on the aircraft carrier cannot be reached, and it is estimated that it will fall apart when it takes off. The body is too small and the carrying equipment is limited. The range is only more than 1,300 kilometers, and such an early warning range is meaningless, so it is better to use fighter jets to patrol the branches.

The Mi-17 and Mi-24 are transport aircraft, and the Z-9 is a modification of a civil aircraft

How does China fight a blitzkrieg? Fight Russia? Hit India? Fight North Korea? Hit Japan?

China's lack of aircraft carriers and transport aircraft comparable to the American C-17 determines that it does not have a suitable long-range fire delivery platform. How can you fight others if you can't send them over? Now there are several elements that must be in place to fight a blitzkrieg.

1.The reason why Germany can sweep Western Europe is that most of the countries in Western Europe are small and basically plain. This allows the armored forces, which are indispensable combat units for quick battles, to go on a rampage.

2.The concept of operations is revolutionary for the target country, but it is also largely based on equipment.

Geographically, Russia is too big, and there is a Outer Mongolia in the middle, so others are ready before they rush over. North Korea? Mountains are mountains and rivers are water.

I don't know how many years it will take to completely knock it down. India is also separated by the Himalayas. And in the middle of Japan is the sea.

Without the support of aircraft carriers and C-17 and other combat equipment, you can't even touch people.

Therefore, it is impossible for China to fight any kind of blitzkrieg, and it does not have the advantages of Germany and the United States then and now.

A modern blitzkrieg, if it is a big country, first destroys its satellites, its networks, its electricity, and paralyzes its livelihood.

The so-called blitzkrieg is the use of high mobility to strike at the enemy when the enemy cannot detect it.

It's very difficult to launch a blitzkrieg now, and with the current means of reconnaissance, the tanks can't play the role of lightning very well, and it is the air force that can play the role of lightning.

That's why the Air Force has the slogan that we will win the first battle.

Use 30,000 aircraft to disable all major value targets in enemy territory.

Funny, China sent to the blitzkrieg, relying on China's thousands of old-fashioned Type 59s? Those tanks did not even have fire control, and they could only be used as live targets on the battlefield, and of course China did the same, but there were very few of them.

The blitzkrieg is to attack the unprepared by surprise and has little to do with the population, and if you want to fight a small country like Vietnam, it is casual, and China should also fight some wars now, so as to reduce the surplus population and promote the unity of the people. Especially to hit Japan! Ha ha.