-
Since you want a head, then choose the original 18-200mm zoom head, known as one lens to go all over the world, wide angle, telephoto are available.
1. The pixels are different, 450d: 12 million; 500d: 15 million;
3. Other more professional aspects, the more subtle differences will not be mentioned,..
The appearance, control, and functions of the two machines are basically the same, and the lenses can be used universally.
Hope it helps.
Addendum: As for what to match, a big factor depends on how much silver you have, or rather, how much silver you want to spend. Canon's original 50mm f only costs about 700 yuan, and "Xiaobai" and the like have thousands, even tens of thousands, or tens of thousands of dollars.
There will definitely be a certain gap in the imaging effect of different lenses. As for the principle, there is no need to explain it too professionally, you get what you pay for;
No matter what lens, whether it is 450d or 500d, or even earlier 300d, 350d, and even ordinary small digital cameras can shoot very beautiful and beautiful night scenes, not to mention landscape shooting in daylight. The performance and grade of the camera are on the one hand, and the lens also has certain factors, but the more important factor is also determined by the "head" behind the camera. An experienced photographer can use an ordinary camera to shoot excellent works, while an ordinary novice, even if he is given a 1ds 5d2 or something, may not be able to shoot well.
From a professional shooting point of view, there is no essential difference between 450D and 500D, just "just different quantification in parameters".
Photography is both an art and a skill that is built up through experience.
There is a popular saying in the industry, which is very straightforward, and you can refer to it: "First-class photography depends on the brain, second-class photography depends on technology, and third-class photography relies on equipment." ”
Generally speaking, if you want to play photography, don't simply compete with equipment, and don't be confused by the parameters of equipment. The most important thing is to consider your actual needs, which aspect to apply, and how much money you can spend.
-
The lens is just 18-200 set of heads. Because you only need one lens, and you only have a long zoom lens. Pat casually and don't care about the lens.
The lens is a bottomless pit. The more advanced the lens. Imaging may be up to 5%, but it's 100% better, and that's the difference.
What's more, the quality of the pullover is not bad.
Are you just playing with photography? Just play photography 450d enough. Because in terms of photographic imaging, there is almost no difference between the two machines of the same grade, and the difference in pixels is not important.
Is 500d better during the day? Actually, it's pretty much the same. At night, you have to take a high ISO, and there are a lot of evaluation samples on the Internet, so you can check them out.
I look at a Canon 50d, 500d; Nikon D5000, D90 comparison. After all, the 500D and 50D chips are one level higher than the 450D, and the noise reduction will be a little better. But it's not too bad.
If you only care about the imaging effect, you don't like post-production. Let's look at Nikon's.
-
Disadvantages: Because the volume of 400d is a little smaller than that of 350d, the most direct result is the decline in feel. The entry-level positioning requires it to only use a plastic body, which exacerbates the problem of poor hand feel, so many friends affectionately call it a "toy".
In addition, the distance between the 400D body handle and the lens is too small, and it is awkward to hold it if you put on a large head. Compared with the 350D, the battery life of the 400D is not too good, and it may be difficult to cope with the mid-trip. The most criticized by players,It is400D lacks spot metering,In all the entry SLR,Only 400D does not have this function,To be honest, it will indeed have some impact on shooting,As for the problem of running focus that everyone discusses,I believe it has something to do with the lens and photography technology of some friends。
-
See if you care about the camera function.
If it's just for taking pictures, the Canon 450D and 40D are better at cost performance than the 500D. The 500d sensor is not very successful, the pixels go up, but the dynamic range goes down, which is not as good as the 450d and has the same problem.
The Nikon D5000 uses a CMOS camera, and the color transition is much smoother than the previous Nikon, according to DXOMARK's test, the CMOS Nikon's color is better than that of the Canon. In addition, the focusing system adopts the system of the former quasi-professional machine D200. In addition, Nikon's CMOS camera has added a very practical function, which is to automatically remove chromatic dispersion, so that the blur caused by the lens is reduced, and the requirements for lens imaging are reduced.
The Canon 500D, on the other hand, has a high pixel count and does not use this technology in the JPG, resulting in a lot of pasty in many places with a sleeve and low-end lens, and it is estimated that Canon will also use this system in the next generation of cameras. Canon 450D and 40D This problem is not so obvious because the pixel density is not very high yet.
I think that's the main highlight of the D5000. The weak point is that there is no focusing motor, and only AF-S and AF-I lenses are used to achieve autofocus, which is not very compatible with Nikon's wide range of AF lenses. Canon's cameras all use lens focus motors, so there is no such problem.
Camera performance 500d spike D5000.
The 40D is a quasi-professional body, with the strongest focus of the three cameras (9 cross-focus points, the Nikon D5000 and Canon 500D both have only 1 cross-cross focus), a shutter speed of 1 8000 seconds, and a 1 250-second flash sync on a magnesium-aluminum alloy body. Moreover, the difference between 10 million phase elements and 12 million phase elements of 450d is very small and can be ignored. Now facing delisting, ** is cheaper than Nikon's high-end entry-level machine D90, and the cost performance is very high.
However, note that Canon's low-end lens and sleeve imaging are not very good, if you buy a Canon camera, you should try to buy a better lens, and it is best to go directly to the L head, in order to give full play to the advantages of Canon's camera with more details.
-
Decisive D90 450D and D90 are not Shouhu Mo a machine that does lead grade D90 is Nikon's mid-range SLR 450D is an entry-level machine 450D has been discontinued Now updated to 650DD90 Balanced mid-range camera, image quality, control are good Feel and control performance Excellent imaging quality The shoulder screen is convenient and practical, and now D90 is relatively out of stock Because the new machine has already been on the market If you can buy it, it is a very good choice.
-
Depending on your needs, there are many models of Nikon Zen SLR, and the D90 is the entry-level machine. Not full-frame. The D7000 is a professional entry-level, full-frame level.
If you want to be a little higher, it's D3X, a professional-grade one. Equivalent to Canon's such as 550d, 7d, etc., I personally think it is better to use 7d. Rent to make dust.
-
Well, I don't know yet, but I'll talk about it in a few days, hehe, I'll know.
Obviously, D90 is better, as can be seen from the parameters, such as body performance, focusing performance, body workmanship, and practical life, D90 is better, and the pricing of the two has said it all.
To say that the most value-for-money entry machine is definitely Canon's EOS 550D, except for high-speed continuous shooting and focusing speed is not as good as 7D, the other configurations are basically the same. And it has a large 104W pixel LCD screen, which is the best display in its configuration. >>>More
LZ, what does it mean that your aperture is small? It's a good thing to have a small aperture! For Canon, Sigma is the best side lens Sigma is the world's largest manufacturer of side lenses, and its lenses are a very good choice at that price point! >>>More
KX, I've also watched it for a long time, there are fewer advertisements, and there are fewer after-sales points across the country, which is his shortcoming, but the quality is definitely better than Canon, Canon is good advertising, good after-sales, **Of course, it's good, I recommend you to buy Pentax KX's big double headgear, two lenses, one 18-55, one 50-300, from wide angle to telephoto, everything is there, **about 5000 more, if it's cheap, buy Nikon, the imaging is absolutely good, Nikon D3000, more than 3000, the head is 18- 55, which is better than breaking the canon.
If this is really fake, it is difficult to identify without comparison, but there are generally not many frauds, and the most likely thing is to repackage parallel goods as licensed goods, and they will generally brush off the serial number. A friend of mine encountered a time, Canon 5D, used it for a year, and found that the real serial number was completely different from the serial number pasted above, and finally, the business refunded the full amount, and added some money to buy 5D Markii. >>>More