Are bird s nests carcinogenic? Is bird s nest really not nutritious?

Bird's nest itself is not carcinogenic, and carcinogenic products are nitrite (mainly blood bird's nest) produced by chemical changes caused by bleaching, fumigation, etc., and it is recommended that you buy it from a regular well-known brand company.

The nutritional value of bird's nest is very low, and it is commercial speculation to say that the nutritional value is high. In terms of protein, the nutritional value is far inferior to various meat, soybeans and other high-protein foods.

Bird's nest has a single function, unlike other foods we eat, most of them are whole-cell foods, rich in various raw materials needed for organic life, in terms of nutritional value, bird's nest is only a low-grade food, with limited nutrition.

Bird's nest contains 50% protein, 30% carbohydrates, 5% iron, 3% other minerals, and cellulose. The protein of bird's nest is mainly mucin (in other words, saliva) secreted by epithelial cells, of which it contains only 1 essential amino acid (lysine) and 3 conditionally (deficient in some people) essential amino acids.

The human body needs 8 kinds of essential amino acids and 13 kinds of conditionally essential amino acids, so the protein nutritional value of bird's nest is very low, which has been confirmed by animal experiments. Feeding rats bird's nest with another single ingredient can produce protein malnutrition. In other words, the nutritional value of bird's nest protein is in quantity, not in quality.

However, the amount of "occasional" consumption is usually insignificant in terms of quantity, so the nutritional value of bird's nest in terms of protein is far inferior to that of various high-protein foods such as meat and soybeans.

It's nutritious, but I don't know if it's valuable, because these minerals and protein are not rare in ordinary ingredients, and if you use scientific nutrition measurement, a bird's nest is not as nutritious as an egg.

But it has a value that eggs can't compare, that is, just because it's expensive enough, and tradition believes that it's enough to replenish, so it's a good psychological suggestion for some people, and a pleasant psychological suggestion is very helpful to health, which is incomparable to eggs.

There is no nutritional value at all, it's just swallow saliva, it's all fried on the Internet, don't really be taken into the pit.

Saliva well, at least the protein is still there.

Bird's nest can maintain the skin, make the skin moisturized, smooth, elastic and can regulate the endocrine cycle, bird's nest for women's skin care, make the skin smooth and white, reduce facial wrinkles, remove acne, replenish blood and invigorate blood, remove stasis and regenerate, and have a good effect on women's menstrual discomfort, menstrual pain and menstrual bleeding.

Bird's nest has nutritional value, but its nutritional value is not particularly high, because the composition of bird's nest has a single function, and its protein content is only, which is not as good as the same amount of crab meat, and the protein contained in it is mainly collagen, which is incomplete protein, not as good as eggs and meat, so bird's nest has nutritional value but is not particularly high.