Simple English Grammar Questions, English Grammar Basic Questions

It's really hard to explain this, but it's better to ask the teacher to buy a practical guide to English grammar and take a look at viThe intransitive verb is not followed by the object sit downvtTransitive verbs with objects, such as seat oneself, but intransitive verbs without objects should be used passively.

adv.Adverbs are mostly -ly words.

prep.Preposition.

conj.Conjunction.

Ah, leave an email address, and I'll take a picture of the teacher's sorting out and send it to you for the third year of high school, and I don't have time to play.

Your question is about basic syntax. Learning a foreign language should be compared with Chinese learning, and languages have common things. I don't know how you Chinese learned, if you don't know anything about the grammar of the Chinese, then you start with Chinese grammar, subject-verb-object, definite complement is the basic grammatical elements, no matter what language has, these concepts have nothing to do with English itself, so the question you ask is not an English learning problem, but a basic problem of language learning, it is recommended that you start with Chinese grammar.

Good luck!

I can't tell you clearly, I suggest you buy a grammar book, because I think it must be clearer than I said.

This ** has all the grammar, you take your time, learn everything step by step, don't always want to climb to the sky in one step, but also master the learning method. In order to disdain your own memory, you can make up some grammatical names with names that interest you, and don't be so rigid.

Both sentences are true.

Do you think is to change the word order of the following sentences, which is a grammatical point. What is a special noun interrogative word, which can be used as a subject, object, and predicate.

In the first sentence, what is the subject, are is the predicate verb, and the predicate is after it. In the second sentence, these people are the subject, are is the predicate, like is the preposition, followed by the object of what (preposition), but what is a special question word must be placed at the beginning of the sentence.

The sentence you added is correct, you mean why is the subject-verb in the clause not reversed?

I'll understand it this way for the time being, your sentence is an object clause, what the people....This sentence is an object after the preposition about, so it is an object clause, and we know that the word order in the object clause should be in the declarative sentence order. The subject in the clause is the people and the predicate is are, which is the normal word order.

The second sentence can be expressed like this! do you think is no longer an insertion! Changed word order!

what is the object (prepositional object) of the special interrogative word as a clause, are the predicate of the clause, these people as the subject of the clause, think is the subject of the whole sentence!

The order of the clauses remains the same in English! For example: do you know what he likes? Do you know what he looks like?

listen to the conversation about what the people above are like?Shouldn't this sentence be used? The end is a declarative sentence.

Listen to this conversation about what these people look like!

The second sentence is true, what is followed by the object clause. above is a postposition of the people.

The first sentence is omitted, do you think, the meaning of the sentence is complete, so it is an insertion, and the second sentence is omitted, which should be written as what are these people like ? In the original sentence, it is obvious that it is a special interrogative sentence rather than an interpolation.

So both of these sentences that you see are true.

what the people above are li This sentence serves as the object of the preposition about, i.e., the object clause so it should not be inverted, but the declarative sentence order.

1.That's right, there was a leak of an it

not only...but also...When two parallel sentences are introduced, and the not only of the previous sentence is advanced to the beginning of the sentence, then the previous sentence is partially inverted, that is, it will improve transportation is inverted into will it improve transportation

2.work cannot be followed if interpreted as "work";

If work is interpreted as "work", you need to add s

This question lacks context, is difficult to judge, and is embarrassing.

3.ready is generally used in the present perfect tense, but it can also be used in the simple present tense, which generally requires that the predicate verb of the sentence is the be verb, in fact, there is not much difference between the two.

For example: he is already 80 years old

he has already been 80 years old.

1. To distinguish between the two cases, it depends on whether the prepositional phrase modifies the object or the whole sentence. If it is a modified object (when there is a logical relationship between the two sides, as in the second question), it is an object complement. If it modifies the whole sentence, such as the components that indicate time, place, and state, it is an adverbial.

However, this example sentence is not obvious, and the emphasis is on adverbials.

2. The subject-verb relationship between the object and the object complement logically means that the object complement modifies the object, and there is a certain subject-verb relationship in terms of action execution and state modification.

1. The so-called object complement, that is, the complement of the object. Adverbials are sentence components that modify verbs, adjectives, adverbs, etc., and Zhuang can also modify entire sentences.

i found tom in the garden. （tom is in the garden.It's very obvious that the prepositional phrase in the garden is a complement!

Another example is we got to work by 12 and finished it around 3 pmHere by 12 and around 3 pm refer to the time, modify the whole sentence, for the adverbial!

2. Take the object as the subject, and the object complement (intermediary) as the complement. Such as tome is in the garden

Whether it is an object complement or an adverbial is indeed a noteworthy linguistic phenomenon, and they are in the same position, and it is indeed necessary to distinguish them. I discern mainly by definitions.

To be an adverbial is to modify a qualifying predicate, such as this sentence translates to I found tom in the garden.

Complement and object have a logical subject-verb relationship, also known as compound object, that is, it is equivalent to a sentence, there is a subject, there is a predicate, but the complement is not the structure of a predicate verb, it is a non-predicate verb, or an adjective, or a prepositional phrase, etc. At this time, the object and the object complement are combined to understand. That is to say, both objects and objects complement are objects, compound objects.

If so, this sentence translates to I found Tom in the garden.

So is this sentence an adverbial or an object complement? I don't think it matters, the difference is the Chinese translation I just made. But sometimes the context may be the only answer, and the specific situation will be analyzed in detail. This ability is also an essential skill for translating English flexibly through grammar.

The prepositional phrase in the example sentence you gave allows for two interpretations, so it is easy for you to be confused.

In the garden can be understood both as a place adverbial and as an object complement in a sentence. If understood as an adverbial of place, then in the garden is to modify the whole sentence, which can be translated as "I found Tom in the garden." ”

If in the garden is understood as an object complement, then in the garden is a modification of the object tom, so that the whole sentence can be translated as "I found Tom in the garden." ”

In the latter interpretation, there is a logical subject-predicate relationship between the object and the object complement, that is, the relationship between the action sender and the action, and it is this that explains the essence of the object and the object complement.