-
I have two ideas.
One, well, it should be like this, the concept of crime is not the same as breaking the law.
Crime: Committing an act that violates the law and is punishable by criminal law. The focus is on criminal law.
So you can check if piracy is a violation of criminal law, and if not, then it's easy to fight.
If it is said that the criminal law is violated to a certain extent, it can only be justified by the degree. That said, not all piracy is a crime.
2. Of course, we can also not speak of crimes in the legal sense. Because we know that it is not impossible to argue with non-controversial issues. Therefore, the definition of crime in this place should also be different.
The meaning of crime in this place should tell us that "waste is a crime" in "crime" is used in one meaning.
That's it, pure hand fighting, hope. I want to use Floating Red!!
-
This, piracy means illegal copying, and this Nima is not a crime? It's all illegal.
So you can steer clear of concepts and play the emotional card. There are similar clips in the movie, and that's a tribute to the classics, not plagiarism. There is a similar melody in it, and that's an innovation on the classic, not a copy.
There are similar functions in the software, which is the redevelopment of the system, not a copycat. In the field of art, all behaviors are beautiful, not to mention poetic learning and creation.
Be sure to define your own behavior as similar, rather than comprehensive plagiarism, copycats, high imitations, etc.
-
Genuine ** expensive, and once the genuine part of the software is upgraded, it will make the original registration code invalid, not cost-effective, and now China's national conditions, per capita wages are low. Even buying groceries has to be budget-conscious, and you told us to spend hundreds of dollars to buy this virtual software? Unrealistic, for the average person, piracy and genuine copy can achieve the same effect, if everything is to support piracy, then the money you spend on software must be astronomical.
Why is there so much pirated software in China? The main reason is that foreign genuine software is expensive, if you can understand our people's feelings, ** lower, we will not buy pirated versions, and will support you genuine, so, in China, there are many complex factors for piracy. Many people who support genuine are completely ignorant of the helplessness of the poor, and they will not empathize with them from their own point of view.
For example, a poor college student finally saved up money to buy a low-configuration computer. You told him to spend a few hundred dollars to buy a genuine operating system?? Unrealistic, right??
Therefore, everything has its two sides, although piracy may hide viruses, but most of the piracy is still very good, and it has also received the favor of the majority of netizens. We can't deny the contribution made by piracy, he sent free operating systems and free professional software to families, which benefited the vast number of people, I think, if there is no piracy, China would not have so many computer talents and computer users, we must support piracy, piracy has an indelible merit!
Word by word. Give it a few points!
-
First of all: the fight against piracy is not only about strengthening people's perceptions and awareness, but also about supporting other parties. For example, society, schools, national legislation, etc., is an all-encompassing act.
You can't deny this point of view at all, because it's a fact and it's the main point of the other party's argument, so it's better to be generous and tell them at the beginning than to let the other person say it. Your main point is not to deny their views, but to discern between measures and measurements, and to highlight who is the main one).
Secondly: Historically, water can carry a boat, but it can also capsize a boat.
Only by attaching importance to the people can we succeed, and those who won the hearts of the people in the past will win the world, and now there is the establishment of new China. All of them have told the people about the importance of the people, can the opponent's defense friend deny that the founding of New China was accomplished by the people? (This is undeniable, because the problems of the upper platform are not easy to say that they are wrong, of course, you can also talk about your school's policy, saying that serving students is to highlight the importance of students and people, not to serve the school and serve the regulations).
The above two points are to highlight the importance of the people, so as to pave the way for the following crackdown on piracy, mainly the people's concept to strengthen the service).
Third: why piracy is rampant is because: where there is demand, there is a market, where is the market?
Is it ** encouragement or corporate promotion? No! It's the people!
Therefore, the problem can only be solved by starting from the source. Treating the symptoms but not the root cause is just a matter of lingering, and only by treating the symptoms and the root cause, can we solve the problem by taking a two-pronged approach.
Fourth: The people are the main body of historical progress, and only by conforming to the laws of history, conforming to the people's history, and conforming to the people's main ideas can we truly move forward.
-
China has promulgated relevant laws on the sale and production of pirated copies, but why piracy is still rampant in the market can only start from the masses who buy pirated copies, and only by strengthening the legal means and taking a two-pronged approach to the masses who buy pirated copies can we effectively crack down on piracy.
First, the idea. 1. The first paragraph makes a point of view. >>>More
The first debate is to greet the chairman, the judges, and the opponent's defense friends: Hello everyone! After that, state your own point of view: we think ......(The positive side is the positive side, and the negative side states the negative side). >>>More
I agree, it's a disaster!
I saw you, I'm Jeff, the teacher of the CQU speaking test, you better think of something of your own.
Arguments against the side:Our position is, "Love one line, do one line". >>>More