What does Yang Zhu s way of refusing to pluck a hair and benefit the world means?

Yang Zhu, a native of Wei, a thinker in the early Warring States period, lived in an era that should be after Laozi, slightly earlier than Mencius, and about the same time as Mo Zhai. He is an important representative of the Taoist school.

Yang Zhu thought that "the ancients lost a little bit to benefit the world, and they didn't do it; Serve the world and don't take it. No one loses a single bit, everyone is not good for the world, and the world is governed. ”

Yang Zhu means to lose a hair on his body to benefit the world, don't do this thing; If people give you all the benefits of the world, you can't take it. No one will lose the hair on their body, and no one needs to benefit the world, and the world will be in order. If everyone is self-controlled, the world will naturally be stable.

The former is manifested as extreme selfishness and does not seek the benefit of the world, and the latter is manifested as indifference to the desire for profit and does not seek the benefit of the world, and the two are consistent in not harming themselves. Yang Zhu believes that the premise of governing the world is not to harm oneself and others, and not to harm others. Mencius called it selfish, and Han Yu also wrote an article to denounce it

Interpretation: Yang Zhu advocates for himself, even if it is beneficial to the world by plucking a single hair, he will not do it.

Mencius said: "Yang Zi takes it as me, plucks a hair and benefits the world, not for it." Mozi and love, Moding is good for the world, for it.

Zi Mo Zhizhong. Persistence is near. There is no power in the cling, and there is still one in the cling.

Those who cling to one evil are also thieves, and they will be abolished by example. ”

Translation: Mencius said: "Yang Zhu advocated for himself, even if it was for the benefit of the world to pluck a single hair, he would not do it."

Mozi advocates both love, even if it is worn from the top of the head to the heel, as long as it is beneficial to the world, he is willing to do it. Zimo advocates the middle way. It is good to advocate the middle way, but if you only know the middle way and do not know the power change, it is the same as being persistent.

Why is it disgusting to cling to it? Because it would damage the true Word, just holding on to one point and discarding many of the rest. ”

Mencius: All the Heart

Mencius said: "Yang Zi takes it as me, plucks a hair and benefits the world, not for it." Mozi and love, Moding is good for the world, for it. The son is not obsessed, the obsession is near, the obsession has no power, and the stubbornness is also one. Those who cling to one evil are also thieves, and they will be abolished by example. ”

Yang Zi (that is, Yang Zhu) takes it as me, plucks a hair and benefits the world, not for it. It is the origin of the idiom "not plucking a hair", that is, even a single hair will not be plucked. Originally referred to Yang Zhu's extreme self-ism. Later, he was described as very stingy and selfish.

Yang Zhu's doctrine, which mainly advocated extreme individualism, was actually a major reaction to Mozi's altruistic thought. Therefore, Mencius often compared the two. Extreme individualism is certainly not advisable.

The correct "I" should be selfless, selfless, self-denying, and establish a correct world outlook, outlook on life, and values.

Mencius said, ".YangziTake the claim 'for yourself' and pull one outHairAnd if it is good for the world, they refuse to do it.

This sentence is from the pre-Qin "Mencius".

Original text: Mencius said: "Yang Zi takes it as me, plucks a hair and benefits the world, not for it." Mozi.

And love, Mo Ding put the world for the benefit of the world, for it. Zi Mo Zhizhong. Persistence is near. There is no power in the cling, and there is still one in the cling. Those who cling to one evil are also thieves, and they will be abolished by example. ”

Translation: Mencius said: "Yang Tzu took the idea of 'for himself' and plucked a hair for the benefit of the world, but he refused to do it." Mozi advocates both love, starting from touching the top of the bald head and reaching the heels.

There is not a single hair on the whole body, as long as it is beneficial to the world, everything is dry. Zi Mo advocated the middle way. Advocating the middle way is actually pretty much right.

However, if you do not know the right to change the way, you are clinging to one point. Why is it averse to clinging to one point? Because it is detrimental to the way of benevolence and righteousness, it is only a little inferior to the rest of the state. "Curved shroud.

Literary Appreciation: Yang Zhu School.

It can be said to be unique among the hundreds of schools of thought, even the Mohist family, which is "fatherless and motherless" in the eyes of Confucianism, is not as radical as the Yang Zhu school. Yang Zhu advocated the theory of "noble self", and he advocated that "the ancients would benefit the world at the slightest loss, and they would not be with them;

Knowing the world is one, burying the lack and not taking it. No one loses a single bit, everyone is not good for the world, and the world is governed. "Those who govern well may not be able to govern things; Those who govern well are not necessarily chaotic. If it is extraterritorial, its law can be temporarily applied to a country, but it is not in accordance with the people's hearts; Under my rule, it can be pushed to the world.

After reading this proposition, we can find that Yang Zhu's thought is not something that can be summarized in the sentence "pluck a hair and benefit the world, not for it", in other words, Mencius only talked about Yang Zhu's idea of "noble self", but did not highlight Yang Zhu's "know the world and serve onebody, and do not take it". Yang Zhu believes that as long as everyone governs themselves and does not invade each other, everyone values their own lives and respects the lives of others, the world can be governed.

Plucking a single hair is beneficial to the world, and not doing it is described as extremely selfish.

Meaning: The ancients plucked a single hair of their own hair to benefit the world, but he did not give it, and let the whole world support him alone, he did not agree.

The deeper meaning is: as long as everyone tries their best to do their best, neither doing what is beneficial to the world nor doing what is harmful to the world, then the world will become very good. The State should not harm the interests of individuals for the benefit of society as a whole, nor should it harm the interests of the minority for the benefit of the many.

If everyone has to protect their own interests and at the same time not harm the interests of others, then this society will be good.

This is the view of Yang Zhu, a representative figure of early Taoism.

From "Mencius: Dedication": Yang Zi takes it as me, plucks a hair and benefits the world, not for it. Mozi and love, Moding is good for the world, for it.

Send the infiltration son to not be in the middle, the middle is near, the middle is not right, and the one is also envious. Those who cling to one evil are also thieves, and they will be abolished by example. Literally, even if plucking a single hair can benefit the whole world, they are not willing to pay this little.

Refers to extremely selfish behavior. This leads to this"A dime a dozen"idioms. The original refers to the doctrine of "for me, for oneself, and for one's life" advocated by Yang Zhu, a thinker of the Warring States Period.

He opposed Mozi's idea of love and Confucian ethics, believing that the main premise of governing the country is to neither harm oneself nor others. Yang Zhu advocates that he is noble and for me. The so-called "noble self" means that the whole nature is fidelity, not burdened by things, that is, it conforms to the natural nature of human beings; For me, it means that the act should be individual.

When Yang Zhu published his thoughts, the princes of various countries launched wars to expand the territory of the royal family and drove the common people to protect the interests of the royal family, which he believed was against human nature and not the way to govern the world. He said: "No one loses a single bit, everyone is not good for the world, and the world is also governed."

However, this set of ideas has been repeatedly criticized in history, and Mencius believed that he plucked a dime to benefit the world, and did not do anything, and since then it has become an idiom for satirizing self-disintegration and self-interest.

Reference: *