If the financial crisis comes, cash or property, which one is safer?

If the financial crisis comes, first of all, the currency depreciation has no purchasing power, the property can be put away, and the financial crisis can be returned to normal, so the property is safer.

Hello. When the financial crisis comes, anything related to economic investment will not be safe, so only cash, which is not an investment, will be safe in your own hands.

If there is a financial crisis, then the property is safer. Cash depreciates, but property doesn't. Although the house price will fall, the house can still be rented.

If possible, the best and safest thing to do is to have both, with a house in hand and cash in hand, so that you don't have to worry.

Financial crises also need to be categorized, such as stagflation or deflation. But in general, cash is definitely more reliable than real estate, provided that the deposit bank is okay.

Cash is afraid of inflation, that is, inflation. The currency will gradually depreciate, and real estate has a better role in preserving value in times of inflation.

Real estate is safer, and there are ** and foreign exchange can also be saved, cash is useless, such as after the Zimbabwe financial crisis, the price of ** tens of thousands of times, everyone billionaire. No amount of cash saved can afford to buy a sack of rice.

Hello, glad of your question, if the financial crisis comes, cash and property, cash is safer.

If the financial crisis comes, neither cash nor real estate is safe, but real estate is more real than cash, and of course real estate is also very depreciated, but no matter how it depreciates, real estate is still there.

If the financial crisis comes, real estate and cash are not safe, because many of the financial crisis is caused by the real estate bubble, due to a large amount of money poured into real estate, resulting in a huge real estate bubble, so in the financial crisis real estate is not safe, followed by cash, there is a financial crisis, prices are relatively high, although the purchasing power is limited, but in terms of real estate cash flow is safer, but not absolute! Because by expanding, purchasing power is decreasing! Cash is depreciating!

When the financial crisis came, cash was much safer than real estate, and at that time the house could not be sold at all, and it was only for self-occupation if it was left in hand, and cash was much more practical.

It depends on what you do, if you are an ordinary person, the financial crisis is coming, if you only have a house and cash, both are safe, just the problem of depreciation, you have a house to live in, don't consider the problem of preparation, the financial crisis is coming, you have cash, as long as you can keep your life, so there is nothing unsafe for you, if you are an investor, the financial crisis is coming, of course it is much safer to have cash, this is what you can **, in fact, when investing at home.

If the financial crisis comes, I personally think that the property is safer compared to the real estate, because when the financial crisis comes, the cash will depreciate.

If the financial crisis really comes, then the difference between cash and property must be that real estate is safer. Because cash is just a currency, it becomes worthless when it is inflationary. At the very least, real estate is a fixed asset, so it is still very valuable.

If the financial crisis comes, it must be that cash is safer, because the property will only have value when it is bought and sold, and no one will buy a house at that time, so the property is worthless during the financial crisis!

If the financial crisis comes, cash is safer than real estate, because once the financial crisis comes, then housing prices will inevitably continue, at this time, if you hold a large amount of real estate in your hands, it will inevitably lead to a significant shrinkage of your wealth, but if you hold a large amount of cash, even if you encounter a financial crisis, your wealth will not shrink significantly, unless the country in response to the financial crisis and a large area of depreciation of the currency may cause their wealth to shrink significantly, so cash is safer than real estate.

If the financial crisis comes, then property is definitely safer than cash. Because of financial crises, generally speaking, the most depreciated is cash.

If the financial crisis comes, the property is safer, because the cash has depreciated too much since the financial crisis, and it has become waste paper, so the value of the property is highlighted, and the property is safer.

If it is really a financial crisis, then cash with real estate will of course be safer, because real estate will always be valuable, and cash in the financial financial crisis, may become useless, many things can not be purchased, or the physical object is more down-to-earth, for example, this kind of is also more down-to-earth and safer.

Relatively speaking, real estate is safer, if the financial crisis comes, cash will depreciate greatly, only the house is real estate, which is safer.

1. The pros and cons of having a house. From the perspective of maintaining and increasing the value of houses, houses in big cities are better than houses in small cities, and houses in small cities are better than houses in small towns and villages. First, the larger the city, the higher the housing price, the greater the room for value preservation and appreciation; Second, the larger the city and the larger the population, the easier it is to rent the house, and the rent is relatively high; Third, the larger the city, the larger the transaction volume of the house, once you need to cash out and sell the house, it is relatively easy to sell.

Disadvantages: First, the house is regulated by the market, and sometimes fluctuates greatly, such as the bursting of the housing price bubble in some foreign cities, and there are many phenomena of a sharp fall, therefore, there are factors for the house to jump down or even leap forward; Second, the property fee is relatively high, and it is very normal for a good house to charge about 2 yuan to 6 yuan per square meter per month, or even higher, and the cost of owning a house is higher; Third, the laws and regulations related to property tax that are being introduced are also factors that should be considered, and if the property tax is high, the cost of holding a house will also increase.

2. There are pros and cons of cash. Cash is generally used to invest in business entities, purchases, treasury bonds, bank deposits, purchase commercial insurance, etc. One is that the investment business entity can own shares and dividends, and under normal circumstances, the yield is high.

However, once the management is not good, the risk of bankruptcy and bankruptcy exists; The second is to buy **** when it is good, the effect is fast and the income is large. But the risk is greater, and there can even be big ups and downs overnight or in a few hours; Third, the income from the purchase of treasury bonds, bank deposits, or commercial insurance is relatively stable and relatively safe. However, the yield is relatively low, the effect of value preservation and appreciation is relatively poor, and due to the impact of domestic and foreign economic and monetary situations, the risk of relative currency depreciation still exists.

First of all, the answer must be cash, in the financial crisis, liquidity has flowed into the bubble industry, many enterprises and individuals will go bankrupt due to the shortage of liquidity.

Therefore, at the most panicked time of the financial crisis, that is, the best time, at this time, the advantage of holding cash is reflected, **, houses, all kinds of rigid assets, are the potential of the future.

If the financial crisis really comes, housing prices will plummet, cash will become worthless, only ** is safe, but if you have to choose between the two, it is still a house, at least a house can live, there is a place to live.

Once a financial crisis occurs, cash and real estate will depreciate severely. But the crisis is only for a while, and it can't be like this forever. Once the crisis is over and the economy recovers, there is more room for property appreciation to increase. So, it's safer to keep the property safe.

It has to be cash, the property is a piece of, no one wants it, money is king.

If the financial crisis comes, real estate is safer than cash, cash is a liquid asset that depreciates quickly, and real estate is real estate and has value preservation.

Of course, it is safer to choose a property, at least there is a place to live, and the house is a physical object. But in times of financial crisis, paper money depreciates and becomes worthless.

When the financial crisis comes, the property is safer, and the cash is likely to depreciate quickly, but the property may not depreciate as quickly.

It must be a fixed asset. The same cash cannot resist the same fixed assets, and the house is the fixed asset that carries the most inflation.

Of course, I'm talking about full-payment housing, not loan housing. There is a rumor that the people who took out loans to buy houses in 16 or 17 years are all on the top of the mountain, and now it looks like a mountainside, and it becomes a mountain top in minutes.

But can you survive the financial crisis without taking out a loan to buy a house? Not necessarily. But at least not to jump off a building.

Those who can take risks have become bosses, and those who can't do it are not all supported by wages. Once the financial crisis and wages have shrunk sharply, car loans, housing loans, and consumer loans every month can be carried by a few people.

Food, clothing, housing and transportation are the big problems of more than one billion families at present, and last year's statistics showed that the salary of one billion talents is 1,000. Can this thousand withstand the financial crisis? It is estimated that your pigsty is more risk-resistant than this.

Financial crises are often accompanied by a sharp drop in assets, and real estate, as real estate, will naturally be greatly impacted in the crisis, especially in a country like China, where real estate accounts for a major position in the national economy. So during a crisis, it's obviously safer to hold cash.

If the economic economy comes, if the financial crisis comes, which is safer than cash, or real estate? Of course, it's cash, it won't be a good idea, and if you come back, if you want to cash out, it may become very low, or even worthless. So when the financial crisis comes, it's best to turn the property in your hand into cash, which will be safer.

Financial crisis. When it comes, it's relatively better to save money.

Because in any case to ensure that life can be maintained, after the economic crisis, financial assets.

will begin to decline, causing turmoil, which in turn will trigger a large area of the real economy.

Going out of business, unemployment increases, and maybe your income level will decrease. When you don't have an income**, cash is better able to support you, after all, a house can't be exchanged for necessities.

If a financial crisis comes, financial assets such as housing prices, stock prices, and bonds will inevitably plummet. This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for those who have money in their hands. Because the real estate bubble burst, you can buy a house and land at a low price, so that you can speculate to the bottom of history.

After the bursting of the real estate bubble in Hong Kong, China in 1997, including Li Ka-shing.

Many wealthy businessmen took the opportunity to buy houses, take more land, and finally get rich returns, which are far more than in the usual days of the fierce situation. At the same time, after the financial crisis, the ** market.

Falling all over the ground are cheap chips, when people dare not buy **, if there is cash you can go to the historical bottom of the ** market. Therefore, when the financial crisis comes, it is an opportunity for people who have a lot of deposits and cash.

A financial crisis refers to financial assets, financial institutions, and financial markets.

The crisis is often accompanied by a large number of business closures and unemployment.

Increasing, the general economic depression of the society, sometimes even accompanied by social unrest or unrest at the political level of the country.

Systemic financial crises are those that affect the entire financial system or even the entire economic system, such as the Great Depression in the West in 1930.

Another example is the global economic crisis that erupted on September 15, 2008.

of the financial crisis.

The financial crisis is characterized by a relatively large depreciation of the currency value of the entire region, a relatively large reduction in the total economic volume and economic scale, and a blow to economic growth, often accompanied by a large number of business closures, an increase in unemployment, a general economic depression in society, and sometimes even social unrest or national political turmoil.

Financial crisis. It will also have a certain impact on our ordinary people, if the financial crisis really comes, many people will be entangled in the financial crisis to save money or buy a house? Is it good to put money in the financial crisis? Relevant content has been prepared for your reference.

When the financial crisis occurs, both the house and the deposit will depreciate, for people with little money, the general recommendation is to save money, because even if the house depreciates, it also has its value, it will not be said that you can buy a house as long as tens of thousands of yuan, it is impossible.

The ** of the house is relatively high, some people save a lifetime is only enough to buy a house, some people save a lifetime and can't buy a house, for ordinary people with little money, if there is a financial crisis, it is very important to keep a job and have a stable salary, at least to keep the expenses of daily life.

If the money saved is just enough to buy a house, then what if you buy a house and need money for daily consumption, this is also something that needs to be taken into account, and for ordinary people who do not have much money to ensure that their lives can be maintained anyway, this is the most important thing.

If there are more funds, the remaining money from the purchase of a house can still maintain the expenses of daily life, then you can consider buying a house, because some rich people will want to sell the property, but there will be fewer people to buy, and the house will decline, at this time, it is more cost-effective, and when the financial crisis passes, the house is also the possibility of existing, and you can choose to rent or sell it to make money.