Who proposed the withdrawal and merger?

There are the following points of view: in the civilized society of the new era, education as a kind of human resource injection behavior, is indispensable, even the poorest, the most uneducated ordinary families, often expect their children to be more educated, because education can open up intelligence, improve ability, increase income, especially for the poor people, education is the channel for them to get out of poverty, improve their social and economic position, or even the only channel.

The policy of withdrawing and merging schools immediately closed down the primary schools in the countryside on a large scale, and stopped the opportunity for rural children to be educated, and the rural children happened to be the group that should be most educated. In order to educate their children, many parents are forced to send their children to campuses in big cities when they are still very young, and such children are separated from their parents at the age when they lack the strength of independent life and should be most cared for by parents, and go to live in an unfamiliar place, which will not only encounter greater confusion and emotional lack in life, but also lack of particularly critical family education, which is also very detrimental to their happy growth.

With the advent of the new era, the agricultural economy has slowly developed and expanded, the people's demand for high-quality education has become greater and greater, the situation of rural primary schools is poor, the number of students is gradually decreasing, and the allocation of teachers is not enough, and the curriculum content cannot be fully opened, which seriously affects the development and growth of education.

At the national level, it is also a consumption of teaching resources. With the acceleration of urbanization, the number of rural students is gradually decreasing, which is not only unable to centralize schools, but also affects the development of education, and should indeed be withdrawn and merged.

In the new era, people's vision of a happy life has determined the requirements for high-quality education. In the school where dozens of people still exist in the village, it is irresponsible to the villagers and the country. Of course, I'm talking about places with better economic growth, and underdeveloped places in the mountains of the central and western regions should be re-developed!

I don't think rural schools should be withdrawn and merged, each school has a different style, and the way of educating students is different, so some students may adapt to the environment of this school, and some students may not adapt to the environment of this school, so the college may make many students tired of learning in the future.

I think that schools in rural areas should be withdrawn and merged; Because there are not too many children in rural areas, and the number of left-behind children is not very large, the withdrawal of schools can improve the quality and level of teaching, and make it easier to manage.

In a positive sense, the withdrawal of points and the merger of schools is conducive to the optimal allocation of educational resources, and the schools that teachers are unwilling to go to are removed and concentrated in counties and towns to run schools, so as to improve the quality of all schools. Solving the problem of compulsory education for students in rural areas through the withdrawal of points and merging schools is a much easier task to operate than to run every school nearby and improve the level of education in rural areas as a whole.

The negative impact is also very prominent, on the one hand, these school-age children have to stay away from their hometowns and stay in schools. Although boarding is not impossible, but children's family education, personality education is also facing a series of new problems, if the first does not subsidize the student's boarding fees, transportation expenses, boarding also means a heavier educational burden for rural children.

On the other hand, a more serious problem is that after the merger, the conditions for running schools are extremely difficult and overcrowded, and the quality of education has not been improved.

Legal analysis: the withdrawal of points and mergers of schools is conducive to the optimal allocation of educational resources, the removal of schools that teachers are unwilling to go to, the concentration of schools in counties and towns, and the improvement of the quality of all schools. The problem of compulsory education for students in rural areas will be solved through the withdrawal of schools and the merger of schools, and the level of education in rural areas will be improved as a whole by running each school nearby.

Legal basis: Education Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 15: The administrative departments for education are in charge of the national education work, and make overall plans and coordinate the management of the nation's educational undertakings. The local people's education administrative departments at or above the county level are in charge of education work within their respective administrative areas. People's departments at or above the county level and other departments of early childhood care are responsible for relevant educational work within the scope of their respective duties.

Article 16: The local people at or above the county level shall report to the people's congress or its standing committee at the corresponding level on the situation of education work and the budget and final accounts of education funds, and accept supervision.

The positive impact is to get more profit from the child and reduce the cost of school; The negative effect is that the chickens are killed and the eggs are taken, and the children do not come to school. The rest of the official explanations are basically clichés...

The withdrawal and merger of schools reflects the constraints of population factors and regional environment on education.

The withdrawal and merger of schools refers to the "education reform" that has existed since the end of the 90s of the last century and officially began in 2001 to rearrange the rural primary and secondary schools across the country.

The implementation of "withdrawal and merger of schools" is mainly due to the scattered rural schools, small class sizes, serious waste of educational resources, uneven quality of teachers, and low quality of education. In addition, the distribution of rural schools is scattered, and the proportion of small classes is large, resulting in a waste of teachers, and the phenomenon of one person per class or even one person and one school exists.

In order to scientifically and rationally adjust the layout of primary and secondary schools, integrate the educational resources of rough dust, implement centralized schooling, and comprehensively improve the quality of basic education, the state officially implemented the policy of "withdrawing points and merging schools with Yanzen" in 2001. While the state is implementing the "withdrawal of points and merging schools", it has also caused a series of problems. For example, it is difficult for remote students to go to school, early boarding life affects children's mental health, and the financial burden on families increases.

In order to reduce the negative impact of the "withdrawal and merger of schools", the state has clearly stated in 2012 that it will "resolutely stop the blind withdrawal and merger of rural compulsory education schools and suspend the withdrawal and merger of rural compulsory education schools", and adopt a cautious attitude towards the "withdrawal and merger of schools". There is even a policy that allows rural schools to be restored according to the actual situation.

Summary. Educational resources are uneven. Grassroots schools are often unable to make full use of educational resources such as teachers, facilities and equipment, and funds due to the decrease in the number of students, so that they are unable to provide high-quality educational services.

The purpose of the withdrawal and merger is to concentrate on optimizing educational resources to better meet the needs of students.

Educational resources are uneven. Grassroots schools are often unable to provide high-quality educational services due to the decline in the number of students, resulting in the inability to make full use of educational resources such as teachers, facilities, and funds. The purpose of the withdrawal and merger is to concentrate on optimizing educational resources to better meet the needs of students.

Insufficient investment in education. In some grassroots areas, education funding is relatively low and cannot maintain the normal operation of schools. In addition, public services such as social security, road transportation, and medical and health care are often underfunded, which in turn affects the schooling situation and quality of education for local students.

Constraints on the level of socio-economic development. In some grassroots areas, the economic level is relatively low, and factors such as parents' jobs and incomes have an impact on children's growth. In addition, due to factors such as population loss and urbanization, the number of students has decreased, and it is difficult for schools to maintain and the quality of education cannot be guaranteed.

The withdrawal and merger of grassroots schools reflects the constraints on education from the imbalance of educational resources. First of all, grassroots schools are often unable to provide high-quality educational services due to the decrease in students, resulting in the inability to make full use of educational resources such as teachers, facilities and equipment, and funds. The imbalance of educational resources is a long-standing problem, and there are large disparities between regions, between urban and rural areas, and even between schools.

This is also one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the number of students in grassroots schools. In addition, in some grassroots areas, investment in education and public services is relatively insufficient, making it difficult to maintain the normal operation of schools. This is one of the main reasons why grassroots schools are unable to provide quality education.

The purpose of withdrawing and merging schools is to concentrate and optimize educational resources, so as to improve the level and quality of education. In addition, the withdrawal and merger of grassroots schools will also help eliminate the gap between urban and rural education, promote the integrity of the Department of Equitable Education, and promote the integrated development of urban and rural education. By withdrawing and merging schools, we can make good use of educational resources, solve the problem of insufficient educational resources, and let more children enjoy high-quality education.

Therefore, the imbalance of educational resources is one of the main reasons behind the phenomenon of grassroots schools withdrawing and merging schools, and we need to increase the investment and attention to grassroots education and educational resources, and optimize the allocation of educational resources, so as to improve the level of education and promote the integrated development of urban and rural education. Clear or.

Yes, in this way, we can combine the resources of teachers so that children can receive a better education, instead of schools everywhere, so that there are fewer children, teachers have to teach several subjects, and they cannot specialize and specialize.

No. The houses in the countryside are scattered, and if the schools are combined, many children have to come to class from far away, wasting time, and it is not good to stay away from their parents if they live in the school.

Yes, I think this will bring together educational resources and give children a better education.

The principal who does not keep the bottom line and does nonsense is not focused on consolidating the school's position, so he will still be kicked out if he withdraws or not.

I think there are fewer and fewer students in rural areas, and some schools even have less than 20 students, so I think we should consider withdrawing and merging schools, so that we can find a suitable place to gather all the students, and we can also provide accommodation for students who are far away.

Rural schools should be abolished, there will be no rural teachers, and there will be no need for special teachers, all of which will save trouble!

Each has its own advantages and disadvantages, the public says that the public is reasonable, and the mother-in-law says that the mother-in-law is reasonable.