Who are the great philosophers, and who are the greatest philosophers in China at the moment

Marx. Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Law (1843).

On the Jewish Question (1843).

Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844 (1844).

On Feuerbach (1845).

The Poverty of Philosophy (1845).

Wage-Labor and Capital (1847).

The Eighteenth Day of the Foggy Moon of Louis Bonaparte (1852).

Outline of the Critique of Political Economy (1857).

Preface to the Critique of Political Economy (1859).

The Theory of Surplus Value consists of three volumes (1862).

Wages, ** and Profits (1865).

Capital, vol. 1 (1867).

French Civil War (1871).

Critique of the Gotha Programme (1875).

Co-authored with Engels:

German Ideology (1845).

Holy Family (1845).

Communist Manifesto (1848).

On the American Civil War (1861).

Capital, Vol. II (1893).

Capital, Vol. III (1894).

I still think it's ***.

In fact, there is no substantive point in discussing this issue.

We can only use the ideas of our predecessors as the foundation of our thinking.

Then trigger deeper thoughts.

Society is progressing, and people's minds should also be progressing.

We cannot be confined to the ideological achievements of others without thinking of forging ahead.

Everyone is a great philosopher! Philosophy is in life, and life is in everyone.

Historically, it is recognized that Kant has a relatively high status. The three main criticisms are the most important.

Modern Habermas. Much more. Check it out for yourself.

Aristotle.

Instrumentalism", Metaphysics, Physics, Ethics, Political Science, Poetics

There is no greatest, only greater.

A true philosopher will have his own philosophical system, and this philosophical system should be in line with the development direction of various contemporary disciplines. On this condition, there may not be one that meets it in contemporary times, and if it is conformed, there is only the philosophical system of "Lover's Macro Philosophical Thought and Theory".

Philosophy is the study of general issues. General questions include: matter, consciousness, cognition, method, logic, etc.

Science is the doctrine of the study of concrete problems. Specific issues include: physics, chemistry, biology, politics, economics, etc.

In ancient times, philosophy was the doctrine that studied all issues. Such as "Zhou Yi" (King Wen of Zhou), "Tao Te Ching" (Lao Tzu), "Analects" (Confucius), etc., the content of these works is all-encompassing. The Zhou Yi was an important beginning of philosophical research, and then the hundred schools of thought put forward a wealth of philosophical ideas.

In modern times, mathematics, astronomy, and medicine have diverged from philosophy and become independent disciplines. Such as "Nine Chapters of Arithmetic", "Compendium of Materia Medica" (Li Shizhen 1578) and so on.

In contemporary times, there is a clear division of labor between philosophy and science, with philosophy responsible for studying and solving general problems, and science responsible for studying and solving specific problems.

In fact, philosophy has long been integrated into human production and life, and has become popular knowledge. It can be said that ordinary people in modern times are philosophers, and those who claim to be philosophical experts and scholars are **, because they are keen to talk about some false concepts and truths that are divorced from reality, plus a few words of birds, deliberately confusing others to show that they are smart, this kind of self-deception is insulting people's intelligence.

There is no such thing as a profound truth in philosophy. For example, "Wang's Philosophy" is concise and easy to understand, and ordinary people can understand and grasp it. Any philosophy that ordinary people can understand is true philosophy, and any philosophy that ordinary people cannot understand is pseudo-philosophy.

Naturally, it's ***. I haven't heard of anyone else who dares to call a philosopher, let alone great.