If the car violates the law, should the owner be contacted first?

Under normal circumstances, if the motor vehicle is involved in an accident or as a tool for violating the law, the owner of the vehicle will definitely bear the corresponding responsibility, and the owner will be contacted first.

If the car is illegal, of course, you have to contact the owner, after all, he is the owner of the vehicle, he has to bear the corresponding responsibility, if he is not driving, contact him, he can also find the driver.

If the car violates the law, should the owner be contacted first? Yes, if the car violates the law, you must first contact the owner of the car, and then contact the traffic police department to deal with it.

If the car has an accident and the traffic police sentence you to full responsibility for the car, the owner himself is the first person responsible.

As for the agreement between you and the borrower, there is no relationship between you and the other party, and the principle of compensation is that you pay the other party, and then you negotiate with the borrower.

There will be no direct contact between the other party's vehicle and the borrower.

If the car violates some laws, the Public Security Bureau will contact the owner of the car first.

If the car violates the law, you must first contact the police, call 110 or 112, and then contact the owner of the car, or contact the insurance.

If the car commits an accident, the first thing must be to contact the owner, even if the car owner did not do it, the owner must also be jointly and severally liable.

Yes, find out the owner of the car first, see if the owner is operating the crime, if it is not the owner himself, then investigate another driver!

Yes, as long as the car violates and you don't hear anything, you must contact the owner first.

Yes, no matter where the car is? The police have a way to contact the owner of the car and then punish it.

If there is a violation of the law in the vehicle, the traffic police must contact the vehicle registrant.

If the car violates the law, do you have to contact the owner first? If there is a driver at that time, you must ask the driver first, and then you will recruit the owner.

If this kind of car is illegal, you must contact the owner of the car. Then determine if the owner and the car are together?

First of all, the person who drives the car on the spot, but the owner of the car is in charge.

With the affirmation of having a happy square, the first thing to contact is to operate the operation before remembering what kind of insurance to report, and what kind of opportunity to open?

The car is a thing, it will not be illegal, it can only be said that there is a record of illegality, and it is the driver who violates the law.

Yes, definitely. The owner of the car is the first person responsible for the car. Regardless of the time when the water is open, it is jointly and severally liable in civil terms.

The car is illegal. The first person responsible will contact the owner.

If the car violates the law, it must be the first thing to contact the owner, and then it depends on who is responsible for what situation, if the owner lends the car to others, it is the first two people to contact.

If you break the law, should you contact the owner of the car with your mobile phone?

The first thing to do when the car is released is definitely to find the owner, this is certain, find the owner to understand the situation.

As far as I know, before the 2017 Network Information Security Law was introduced, it was very convenient to obtain the information of car owners. The app is originally a professional to do this, the software can easily query the name of the owner**, specifically ask **service.

At present, > Running Dingche> has been transformed into a tool service platform for car owners. The basic information of the vehicle can be queried through the license plate number, and the national support includes functions such as brand, model, frame number, purchase date, and 4S shop maintenance records, insurance company insurance claim records, violation records, driver's license deduction points, and new car license plate numbers.

There are two ways to know how to check the license plate number of the car owner:

Those who need to inquire can apply to find the owner by going to the insurance company with valid documents and applying for construction according to the other party's license plate number. However, the insurance company is in the protection of the owner's information, and the procedures required will be more cumbersome, and if it is an improper reason such as revenge and retaliation, it is estimated that the insurance company will not assist.

Since the owner's information is private, there is no way to find it, unless an acquaintance goes to the local public security bureau traffic police team to check.

Although there is a self-service machine to check the violation in the place where the violation fine is paid, if the vehicle you check has a violation, then you will know who the owner of the car is. However, it will not be announced on the contact party of the owner, which will provide convenience for criminals to get the deck.

Hello, if the owner himself does not go, it is impossible to go through the transfer procedures. On the other hand, it is illegal to dispose of another person's property without his or her consent. Liability for damages is civil and criminal liability may be imposed if it is serious.

Article 49 of the Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that: "If the owner and user of a motor vehicle are not the same person due to leasing, borrowing, etc., and the liability of the motor vehicle party after a traffic accident occurs, the insurance company shall compensate within the limit of compulsory insurance liability for motor vehicles." For the insufficient part, the user of the motor vehicle shall be liable for compensation; If the owner of the motor vehicle is at fault for the occurrence of the damage, he shall bear the corresponding liability for compensation.

The fault of the owner of a motor vehicle in accordance with Article 49 of the Tort Liability Law refers to the lessor's or lender's negligence in examining the driving qualifications of the lessee or borrower, or concealing or failing to inform the motor vehicle of its fault.

From the above provisions, it can be seen that if a traffic accident occurs in a car rented by a car rental company, the user of the motor vehicle shall bear the civil liability for compensation, and the lessor shall bear the corresponding liability for compensation because of the fault of the lessor, but only the user shall jointly and severally compensate part of the losses of the infringed party, which is only beneficial to the infringed party and does not reduce the liability of the motor vehicle user. Under normal circumstances, regular car rental companies will not make those mistakes stipulated by law, that is, there will be no statutory fault, and most of them will not be liable for compensation.

From the general civil law principle, it can also be known that who is responsible for the infringement and who benefits is responsible, the car rental company only rents the car to obtain benefits, and the use of the rented car has nothing to do with the car rental company, so the tort liability for traffic accidents of the rented motor vehicle should not be borne by the car rental company.

In addition, the motor vehicle rental contract should also clearly stipulate the tort liability for the traffic accident of the leased motor vehicle, and the car rental company shall not bear the tort liability according to the agreement.

According to the law, the user of the car is responsible, and the other car owner, that is, the rental company here, is a supplementary responsibility, in simple terms, if you want to drive and kill someone, you can go and rent a car, you are not responsible anyway. If someone wants to use this to cause trouble, they will use the car of the rental company.

It should be written in the contract, and you should read it carefully when you sign the rental car.

Because you have a contract. Haven't you read the contract?

I think the lawyer's statement is very correct, the owner's car is placed in his yard, whether it is locked or not, it is the freedom of the car owner, and the child enters the car without permission and is locked and causes suffocation and death is an accident, and it is not the owner's business at all. I sympathize with the grief of parents who lost their two children, but no matter how sad they are, they can't slander people at will, and the parents themselves are unreasonable, and it is very immoral to use the death of the child to blackmail the owner of the car to compensate. To put it mildly, the owner's car is estimated to be unable to drive in the future because two people died, so can he also ask his parents for compensation?

The owner didn't do this, because he knew that the incident itself was an accident, and the loss of the two children was heart-wrenching enough, and asking for compensation at this time would undoubtedly add insult to injury.

The owner also had a kinship with the parent, and after the incident, he also went to the parents' home to offer condolences, and the owner did a good job. I hope that parents will not forget their conscience while being sad and grieving.

01: Two children enter the car to play without permissionOn June 22, two children in Guangzhou died of dehydration and suffocation because they had entered someone else's car without permission and were locked in a broken car. The children are still very young, for this kind of thing did not know how to save themselves, no one heard the call for help, the weather in Guangzhou was in high temperatures, in the closed environment in the car children dehydrated and suffocated, and finally both died.

Some people will say that if the car door is locked well, the child will not be able to enter at all, and the car owner is to blame for not locking his car door! But the fact is that the car is parked in the yard of the owner's house, and it does not belong to a public place, so whether it is locked or not, no one else has the right to ask. The child is young and playful, wandering around, trying to open the door when he sees a car, but he didn't expect it to be really unlocked, so he went in to play, and accidentally pressed the hollow door lock in the car, so it was locked.

02: The child disappeared and the parents did not look for it in timeThe child was locked in the car for four or five hours, and the child's parents did not come out to look for it at that time, which was actually due to the lack of parental supervisionAlthough it is normal for children to play everywhere in the same village, normal parents will not let their children go home for hours, which is really wrong for parents. If parents can keep an eye on their children, this will not happen, or if they look for the child in time for an hour after the child disappears, and maybe find the child trapped in the car.

So when something like this happens to a child, isn't the biggest responsibility for the parents not the parents?

The law is also very fair and just, not the responsibility of the car owner, then he does not need to bear it, even if the parents are resentful of the car owner and want him to compensate, there is no way, because this matter is really not the car owner's business. If the owner of the car is responsible for this matter in the end, I will really cry out for the owner of the car, I didn't do anything, two people died in the car for no reason, the car was scrapped, not to mention, and I would be asked for compensation.

This matter is not only a matter of the owner's lack of responsibility, but also the law should investigate the child's guardian for failing to fulfill his guardianship responsibility. Is it not legally responsible for the death of the ward caused by the failure to fulfill the guardianship obligation? There is a lot of news of children drowning at this time of year, what about the responsibilities of guardians?

For parents of children, guardianship is not only a right, but also an obligation.

Parents should be punished, guardianship is also an obligation, do not take good care of the child, cause the death of the child, is there no need to recover the legal responsibility at all? I've seen a few news stories where the biological parents forgot their child in the car and died. I want to say, if it is a stepfather and stepmother, will others suspect that it is intentional?

If someone dies because of negligence but does not have to bear any legal responsibility, will it be exploited by someone with a heart? The situation of the owner of this article is different, his car is parked in his own home, the lock is his own business, should not pay responsibility, unlike what fish pond, deep well, although it is his own home, but it may be dangerous foresight, so it must do a good job of safety protection. The car is parked in your own home, and common sense is safe.

And young children (four or five years old is the age when they need adult care) ran in and died because their parents were not optimistic, and their parents were responsible. And the owner should also be compensated.

I just want to ask those who think that the owner of the car should be responsible, and who should pay compensation to those who drown every year.

The owner is wronged! Do you have to lose money if your car is scrapped? It doesn't make sense! Encourage unhealthy tendencies!

If this is reversed, the first thing that should be investigated is the responsibility of the child's parents, that is, the guardians. If you don't have the ability to take care of them, don't give birth to them. If you can't educate them, don't raise them. How embarrassed to say that he is the injured party, and the real victim is the child.

Parents are not optimistic about their children, and they blame people for not locking their cars, if you are in the river, do you want to find the country to accompany you? Is.

The owner of the car has no responsibility, the parent's supervision obligation has not been fulfilled, and such a small child cannot leave the parent's sight for too long! Although the child is gone, we can understand the heartache of parents! But the owner can't be blamed.

The reason is simple, if parents think that the car is not locked in their yard, it is a danger to their children. So if a person sneaks into your house and goes to the kitchen to take a kitchen knife and injures himself, is the law going to hold the homeowner responsible for not hiding the kitchen knife in a place where people can't find it? First of all, the child trespasses into the private area of someone else's house, and the behavior is done by the child himself.

Please do not confuse the law with human feelings.

My money was put in a bag and was stolen, and after the thief was caught, the lawyer said that I was also responsible: because why don't you keep the money in the bank, if you keep it in the bank, the thief can't steal it.

The law is the law, not the mud.

It is precisely the failure of parents to fulfill their guardianship obligations that really lead to the vicious consequences, and this should be prosecuted.

In this case, the car owner violated that law, and if the car owner is not responsible, what basis is there for it. Speaking as a lawyer, it is necessary to analyze it from the perspective of changing careers. If you want to file a case, there is still a lot of controversy about which law to apply, and the best solution is mediation.

The lawyer is not clear about the responsibility, and will only be with the mud, just because of the bad publicity, some people have the problem of finding others in advance, as long as they make trouble, they can have money to compensate, even in court, the lawyer will ask for appropriate compensation out of humanitarianism, and if it goes on like this, the consequences are unimaginable.