Learning troubles Do you remember before you understand or do you understand before you can remember

Personally, I feel that I understand first, and I can remember it naturally, and I will remember it more deeply if I think I used to memorize it a lot, and then I forgot it in a few days, and then I gradually grew up, and it took a lot of time and energy to understand, and then those things naturally remembered, and I was impressed, in fact, understanding is very important, this is true, but I only discovered this truth when I went to college, alas.

Hope, thank you!

It is easier to remember first and then memorize, not understanding is just rote memorization, easy to forget quickly, and will not use, if you don't understand, you can remember first, and then slowly understand in recall. Comprehension and memory skills are both important, comprehension skills can help analyze the internal relationship of data and information and establish connections with existing knowledge, and memory ability can help us use various situations through recall.

Understanding and memorization are two processes of learning, and they are mutually reinforcing. comprehendable knowledge, comprehension promotes memory; What cannot be understood, memory can promote understanding, as the saying goes, "read a book a hundred times, its meaning will come to itself". When he was young, his memory was dominant and he was good at reading and remembering; When you're older, comprehension prevails.

You can only remember if you understand it first, and only then can you remember it if you understand what it means, otherwise you will forget it after a while.

If you understand it, you will naturally remember it, and if you don't understand it, it is not in vain.

Understand before you remember, you understand what it means, even if it's not the original text, you're going to say pretty much it.

If you want to make learning less complicated, you must use the right method. Is it better to understand first and then remember? Or is it better to memorize before understanding?

Personally, I think learning is still about understanding first and then remembering. This is the manifestation of living and learning, otherwise it will seem that people are learning in a state of rote memorization. Only by using learning methods flexibly and changing thinking can learning become easier.

01. Understanding is the most basic step in learning. If a person doesn't even know what the knowledge points are talking about when they are studying, then why is there any need to continue? At this time, the way to think about it should be how to understand this knowledge point, but not to let yourself continue to learn progress.

You must not be afraid to spend time studying, after all, "sharpening a knife is not a mistake for a woodcutter". Sharpening a knife is the first step in chopping vegetables, and understanding is sharpening knives, and chopping wood is learning.

02. Rote memorization is not efficient. The most important thing in learning is not speed, but efficiency. This is a specific gravity of speed and mass.

It's not right to just blindly pursue speed, if the quality of learning is not ***, then what's the use of speed? If you simply memorize by rote, you won't be able to get knowledge in your head. Because you are passively receiving knowledge, not actively digesting it.

03. Understanding first and then remembering can make people's memory points more profound. In fact, the process of rote memorization is very long, because your brain is working passively. So you have to spend a lot of time on this, and you don't even have a full grasp of the knowledge.

But understanding is different, and understanding can take a long time, and it may even surpass your rote memorization. But it's very efficient, because you're actively absorbing knowledge, which makes people remember the knowledge more deeply.

When we study, we must find a learning style that suits us. I think it's best to understand and memorize first, but it's better to choose according to your habits.