Is Fan Di an s plagiarism of Huang Yiming s The Modern Composition of the Spirit of Nature true or

1.There is no evidence that Mr. Fan Di'an plagiarized Huang Yiming, which may also be **negligence, as for Huang Yiming not investigating** and still blindly talking about plagiarism, it can only show that he has ill intentions.

2 There is no evidence that Mr. Fan Di'an benefited from publishing the news on the real estate website, Xiao Changzheng's exhibition is only a small one of the hundreds of exhibitions in the museum, compared with the 300 years of American art, the Europa Art Festival, the German Cultural Year, and so on, Xiao Changzheng's exhibition is only about a week, and the impact is very small. Mr. Van Di'an didn't need to earn fame through this article.

3 Mr. Fan Di'an's writings are hundreds and thousands, and his writing and artistic thinking are respected, which is not comparable to Huang Yiming's concept of "natural spirit". If you are interested, you can listen carefully to his interview, which tells the historical relationship between Chinese and Western culture and art very clearly and has a unique and in-depth introduction.

4. If a person who creates rumors and slanders others in this way jumps out to ask the law to notarize it, then it is best for the law to give a ruling as soon as possible, so as not to pretend to be weak by virtue of his identity outside the system, confuse people's public opinion, and destroy the cultural environment of the Chinese people.

Yes? Fan Di'an admitted to plagiarism? Does that have an impact on Fan Di'an's career?

What about the article? Where I want to see ...

A bunch of boring rumor-mongers, who would believe in nothing? Only those who do not have the slightest sense of reason will believe the hype of nonsense. Despise those hypemen!

To Fak International:

1.I am "unable to tell the difference between the franc and the mark", because I only pay attention to the exchange rate of the euro!

2.I can't tell who is hyping Huang Yiming or Fan Di'an, but I know that Huang's article is signed by Fan's name, and Fan is plagiarism!

3.I can't tell which one is the "vest", but I can't find out what your names (Farke International, Look at the Grass, Blue Stapler) are doing in the art world?

4.I don't know much about anyone, but the articles of Liang Xiaobin, Jia Mu, Cao Xiwa, Qin Ren, Zi Mo, etc. are still easy to read!

5.I can't tell if you still know how to speak, but I know that you are always avoiding the fact that Fan Di'an plagiarized!

6.I don't know how anxious you are, but I know that invective is often inferior!

7.I can't say all the difference between humans and other animals, but I know that to be human you have to have a conscience!

8.I don't know your IQ, but I know that sloppy slapping is always looked down upon!

9.I'm not going to assert your intentions, but please be a man for your own name!

10.I don't know how embarrassing you will be in the face of "Fan Di'an's plagiarism", but you really don't have to jump off the wall in a hurry!

Lao Fan is not guaranteed in the evening, it is a pity, I knew today, why bother in the first place?

Do you use the stolen things with peace of mind I don't have that ability I still be such a high official Buy it Support justice Huang Yiming.

Support Huang Yiming, cultural corruption must be eradicated!

Didn't you still say it on the Internet today, now that corruption has exceeded people's limits, so some people have come forward to do justice!

It's more true than true, I don't want to hear you guys messing around here, I want to see convincing evidence!

This matter is pure hype, the thief shouts to catch the thief, Fan Di'an is innocent, and Mr. Huang must have evidence for slandering people.

This incident is very suspicious, and there are many suspicions.

Check out this article:

And it is not difficult to find from the Internet that in the case of inconclusive evidence of the matter, people who hype up and imagine such as Jia Mu, Cao Xiwa and others have an affair with Huang Yiming. It does not evaluate people, but it does not pay attention to the legitimacy of the evidence, and it is unfair to imagine it at will. It's better to calm down before things are decided.

This matter is pure malicious hype. The evidence is obviously insufficient, a local product **, and has not been contacted, interested people can call ** to try. And the ** did not indicate which Fan Di'an, without verification, Huang Yiming and others dared to directly conclude that it was Fan Di'an, the director of the National Art Museum of China.

The above conformist is probably Huang's accomplice, or even himself. When and where did Van Dian admit it? Please speak up!

According to my observation, several friends who hyped Huang Yiming's matter should be from the same online hype group, and they hyped an incident at the same time on the blogs of major ** and several major BBS, which made this matter heat up quickly on the Internet and attracted the attention of netizens. Achieve the hype effect.

It's a pity that Fan Di'an is only an expert in the art world, not a celebrity in the entertainment industry, and the attention of the people is still not enough. If it is replaced by Zhang Yimou's plagiarism and plagiarism, it is estimated that it will be hot.

I admire the sensitivity and methods of Internet speculators, and just by the "signature" of an online article, can it be concluded that it is plagiarism published by Fan Di'an himself? This can even be further thought of as a "conspiracy theory", isn't this whole thing a farce directed and acted by Huang Yiming and his hype group? The hype group first posted an article with the signature of "Fan Di'an" on the Internet, and then the thief shouted to catch the thief's crazy hype about the incident.

Fan Di'an is actually very innocent, he only became the target of the hype group because of his position in the academic world.

Raising popularity is the ultimate goal of all hype, and what I also want to know is that in the rules of online hype, it is Huang Yiming who pays money and profits to ask the hype group to operate and hype this matter, improve his own popularity, and thus sell the painting at a high price. Or is it that the hype group sees the hype value of Fan Di'an, and spontaneously hypes for the hype, so as to enhance the group's own popularity and get more "hype orders"?

It's true, Fan Di'an himself admitted it.

However, he has to take care of his face as a big leader, and he can't come out in public to embarrass himself, and can only eliminate the impact by some means, such as deleting online posts.

Support upstairs.

Fan Di'an wasn't a good thing in the first place.

He's an old pervert.

Hehe, it's very simple, as long as you have a little thinking and some understanding of the art world, you know that it is Huang and others who are spreading rumors and slander.

It's fake, what good is it for Fan Di'an to publish it on a corner specialty network? His articles are very well written and have his own style, and if he uses other people's articles (not good or bad), he may not be good for his academic image, which he should know very well. And if he really did this, he would definitely use some tricks, and it would be impossible to delete a few sentences and copy the signature completely.

From the point of view of motives and methods, this is impossible.

This matter may be the negligence of the work of the China Specialty Network, because the ** of the article in the Internet era is generally not notified to the author himself (I believe that the vast majority of academic people have this experience), so it is impossible for the person who is signed to be guilty of negligence to know, not to mention the little-known non-professional **. Huang may also be a little excited, but the suspicion of using celebrities to hype cannot be ruled out, because after all, the evidence is very marginal. If there is such a problem, you should find ** first, and ask if Fan Di'an let ** send it, and blatantly target Fan Di'an without absolute certainty, and it is very rude to people, if it is not reckless and reckless, it is to take the opportunity to hype.

In any case, this evidence is insufficient, and it is not credible in terms of motives and methods.

The most classic - Xun Qin Ji, the most bullish fork - celebrating more than one year (the three hundred capitals of Tang poems were plagiarized).

Culture knows no borders, and I don't think it is plagiarism for Chinese culture to spread to foreign countries and become part of other countries' cultures.

It's true, my friend just came back from South Korea, and it seems to say that in the book, but the Korean people don't know that it's Chinese culture, it seems.

Vocabulary: plagiarism.

Zhuyin] piāo qiè

Interpretation] plagiarism; stealing someone else's text; or academic achievements in literature and art, scientific research, design, etc. Such as: the writer is like a thief's theft. Plunder.

stealing someone else's text; or academic achievements in literature and art, scientific research, design, etc.

I do have the end version of txt. But there was no extra. Don't know if it's okay?

Please send me an email if you can. Then I'll send you a drop of the past.

These things are unilaterally said by South Korea! They still have to apply for the Dragon Boat Festival, but they didn't succeed. What I don't understand is, why didn't China apply?

They say that Confucius and Qufu are Korean, but no one admits it. In fact, many Chinese things have been taken away by South Korea, such as traditional Chinese medicine, except for South Korea, many foreigners think that it is Korean, because South Korea has carried them forward very well, and Chinese traditional Chinese medicine, I really don't say it. My sister-in-law, who studied Chinese medicine, said that Chinese do not attach importance to Chinese medicine, China does not promote Chinese medicine, and it is difficult to find a job if you study Chinese medicine.

But South Korea is different, they have been promoting Chinese medicine at home and even abroad, and in this way, I think that one day Chinese medicine will abandon China and become called Korean medicine.

These problems are mainly that Chinese do not pay attention to them, you look at the Dragon Boat Festival, which young people still attach importance to him now? But in South Korea, he is on the same level (level of attention) as the Spring Festival!

In fact, China should also self-reflect and introspect, and not always put the responsibility on South Korea...

Crossing and Anti-Crossing ".

The Kitchen Queen" Phoenix Seeks the Phoenix

Xiaoran Dream "Bathed in Fire Phoenix Rouge Crush".