What does it mean when a leader says that others are doing a good job in their posts?

The meaning of this phrase may vary from person to person, but it can generally be understood in the following ways:

1.Praise: The leader may be satisfied with someone's performance at the job and think they're doing a good job. This is a recognition and praise for the hard work of the employees.

2.Affirmation: When the leader says that others are doing a good job in the post, it may also be an affirmation and recognition of the employee's work. This means that employees are making important contributions at work and that leaders are satisfied with their work.

3.Encouragement: When the leader says that others are doing a good job in the post, it may also be an encouragement and motivation for the employee. This shows that the leader has high expectations of the employee's work and wants the employee to continue to perform well.

4.Reminder: When a leader says that someone else is doing a good job in the job, it may also be a reminder to employees that they need to continue to work hard and maintain good working condition to keep the organization competitive and growing.

In conclusion, the specific meaning of this sentence depends on the context and intention of the leader to speak. If the leader is saying it in public, then it may be a public praise and affirmation; If the leader is saying it in private, then it may be an encouragement or reminder.

It depends on what occasion your leader said, if it is only praised at the meeting, it is to motivate people who do well in their posts, and it is also to motivate others. If I say it to you alone, it means that you need to work hard!

Sometimes, when a leader evaluates an employee, the main way he evaluates it is to say that someone is doing a good job and doing a good job.

This is a reminder to work hard, an expression of dissatisfaction with your work, and to understand the meaning of the leader.

Even if you do every job, you will take out the evidence to prove that it is you who do it. If there is no evidence, it will be ripped off. Think about it from another perspective, your subordinates have no evidence, but they say that he did the work, do you believe it?

This time I didn't, so I could only admit it and endure it. Try to leave evidence next time. At work, multi-faceted leading cadres understand the common problems in the work, ask for instructions and report with a straight face, and explain the progress of your work on the side; The phased report does not mean that the leading cadres do not talk about it and do not report, and carry out the report every day or weekly, whether verbally or by e-mail, if there is no ** or weekly rules and regulations, then they will actively do it themselves.

and often grabs credit to win people, after a cooperation, there will be no more cooperation, and there is a complete refusal in the work, and privately explain the situation to the leading cadres; The next time you do work, you can bury some inaccuracies in the situation, and your friends take the results of your work to the boss to grab credit, if the boss finds that there is a problem, he will ask him questions, not solve it himself, and generally can't respond. It's not uncommon to rob others of their contributions in the workplace.

Our suggestion is not to be annoyed and occupy the brain, the premise is to consider yourself, learn lessons, think about whether you still need to improve your communication level, pay attention to upward communication, and control your own leadership. The relationship between colleagues is delicate, but no one is stupid, especially the eyes of the masses are always bright. In the eyes of friends, everyone has a dry and solid imprint, and with the passage of time, this feeling will become more visible until the reputation is mixed.

Therefore, there is no need to listen to the words of the family for a while, let alone act irrationally because of a momentary anger.

Emotional instability can jeopardize one's own discernment, and one should not lose one's mind at any time to avoid being fooled. If they are gossiped once or twice, the leading cadres can still be biased and secret. If you have been chewed repeatedly, then your brand image in the minds of leading cadres will definitely be affected.

This is the great truth of three people becoming tigers. Humanity in society, related to each other, and no exception in the workplace. You also need to see the truth clearly, that is, the leading cadres have a good relationship with her, as long as they do not take a firm stand, and the leading cadres have always loved, accustomed to, and cared for her.

I will ask this colleague to re-elaborate all the work in front of the leader without any information assistance, and if he can't say it, it means that all the work is done by me.

I'll pretend I don't know, because sooner or later the truth will come out, and he'll be even more embarrassed.

Directly take out evidence to expose him, tell the leader that you did these things, and let the leader see his true face.

What does it mean that the leader always says that another colleague is bad in front of me? Should I remind that colleague? The leader's move is the evidence of the henchman, and the leader's move may actually be the evidence of the henchman, and it is also the most ideal of many possibilities.

In the workplace, everyone always has some people close to them, and the same is true for leaders, who also have their own "small circles". Leaders are just mortals in the workplace, with their own likes and dislikes. And the core members in this "small circle" are the leader's henchmen, and the leader trusts you, and the words and deeds that you don't show in front of people on weekdays will also be shown in front of you.

In this case, just because your leader treats you as a confidant doesn't mean you can react at will.

<> it is precisely because the leader regards you as a person in his "small circle", then you should not live up to the leader's trust in you, but choose to behave in an appropriate way, which further confirms that his trust in you is correct. It is also possible that the leader is using this question to examine more of your ideological dynamics, to confirm and consolidate your position in the "small circle". The leader's move is pure catharsis, and the leader's move may actually be pure catharsis, and there are no other factors.

Especially in private conditions, many leaders will not restrain themselves, and directly open the negative emotions to the professionals around them. In this case, the leader trusts you for a while, but this is all time-limited. As mentioned above, this kind of short-term trust does not have a long "shelf life", but only a momentary trust, and he does not regard you as a confidant at all.

Maybe you heard the "bad words" of the leader's true feelings at this time, if it weren't for his nature to be so straightforward, in fact, he might just be a momentary gaffe in front of you. Therefore, in the future work and life, you must keep your mouth shut and forget this matter completely, then the leader may trust you more.

The leader's move may actually be a "chicken and monkey" to warn you not to make mistakes like the employees in his bad words. Leaders as management always have different personalities, and some leaders are used to "going around and around" and cleverly use other people's examples to remind you. As a subordinate, you can't just hear the leader's bad words about your colleagues and then say bad things, but you should reflect on yourself to see if the leader is insinuating that you have similar problems.

In this case, the first thing you need to do is to identify your mistakes and correct them.

When saying bad things about a colleague, echoing the leader to say bad things about the colleague may not agree with the psychology and cause self-contradiction. When you talk about the bad things about other colleagues, you may just talk about it.

The leader says that another colleague is not good, which means that there is a problem with his work ability, so you don't say anything in front of the leader, and you can look back and see that your colleague can be kind and appropriately reminded.

It may just be to express your dissatisfaction with another colleague, but I personally recommend that you tell that colleague, because the impact on that colleague can be significant.

Maybe the leader wants to listen to your opinion, and even if you know about it, don't tell your colleagues, which is no different from betraying the leader.

Summary. The leader said that I was not suitable for this job, and the main meaning included:

You are not familiar with the relevant business, and you have no clue and pattern in your work;

You are not up to the job you are doing and appear disorganized and disorganized;

You have no experience or talent in the relevant work, and you are dull and wooden;

The expectations of your work did not achieve the expected results, or even much worse than expected;

was said by the leader to be unsuitable for this position.

You are not up to the job you are doing and appear disorganized and disorganized; 3.You have no experience in related work, which means lack of divination or talent, dull and wooden; 4.The expectations of your work did not achieve the expected results, or even much worse than the expected results;

Being told by the foreman that you are not suitable for the job.

Main meaning. Change positions.

Let's make a few brief points!

First, it can be seen that this person is not a good leader! But since he can get to this position, it is also his turn to rank seniority, not you.

Second, since you work in the office, how can you not learn a little about office politics, this must be known.

Thirdly, although he is not a good bird, obviously you can't change, he can't achieve your future, but he can stink your present.

So what you should do is a trade-off.

Therefore, you must look at others with appreciation, be good at discovering the advantages of each person, and handle the relationship with leaders and colleagues, so that your work can be recognized by everyone.

For such leaders, you can play a little trick and divide the work into time periods! If he still has something to say, just tell him directly, do it quickly, don't do it slowly, and ask what you can do to be satisfied???

Such people are villains, and the identification is complete.

The official level crushes people to death, the so-called big eats the small, and the small eats the small.