Whether the family is rich or not, mainly depends on the daughter in law , is it superstition?

Whether the family is rich or not, mainly depends on the daughter-in-law", this sentence seems superstitious, in fact, there is a certain truth behind it, these sayings are the experience of the ancestors, the wife is an important role in the family, whether a wife is virtuous or not will directly affect the development of a family or even a family.

From the perspective of ancient China, the criterion for judging whether a woman is excellent or not is not the level of individual talent, but more whether she can run a family. Because the family structure in ancient China is typical of patriarchy, men are the main economic pillars of the family, while women are more tasked with helping their husbands with housework at home, such as taking care of children, supporting the elderly, cleaning, dealing with interpersonal relationships between relatives, daily life, etc.

Therefore, in the ancient patriarchal society, the judgment of whether a woman is excellent or not is reduced to one sentence: a woman is virtuous if she is not talented. Incompetence here refers to whether you have the skills to make money, such as having the skills of a certain industry, or having a certain amount of research in literature, but it does not mean that you are not capable.

In ancient times, women's ability to take care of household chores was very high, needlework, household hygiene, filial piety to the elderly, etc., all of which had to be done in every detail.

So whether the family is rich or not, what kind of relationship does it have with his wife? Although modern society pays attention to the equality of men and women, but the patriarchal society has lasted for thousands of years, and many men in our country still have "face thinking". So "mainly looking at the daughter-in-law" does not refer to how much money a woman can make.

Whether rich or not here is actually more about estate planning. In modern times, many married men will choose to hand over the family assets to their wives for safekeeping, the reason is that although men are very good at making money, most of them have the habit of spending lavishly, which has a lot to do with men's personalities, they understand that they are not good at living a budget-conscious life, but the wives at home are very good, so most of them are willing to be kept by their wives.

A good daughter-in-law can plan family assets well, for example, normal living expenses will be limited, and women tend to be more rational when planning family expenses. Ma Yun once said that the vast majority of users on ** are women, but their spending is often not for themselves, but for the family to buy supplies.

From another point of view, the formation of a family by a man and a woman is the integration of the resources of both families. For example, if the husband is doing a business in a certain line, although his wife does not understand it, but a relative of the wife has a lot of resources in this business, the husband can use the resources to create wealth through the relationship between the wife.

Conclusion: It has been the case throughout the ages, a woman who takes care of her family may not be able to make the family rich, but she can make her home a warm harbor. But if a woman who does not care about her family allows her husband to earn more outside, it will be difficult for the family to accumulate wealth.

Therefore, there is some truth in the saying "whether the family is rich or not, mainly depends on the daughter-in-law".

This is not superstitious and has a certain reference significance. Outside the male and female protagonists, the wife is responsible for taking care of the property and taking charge of the expenses of daily life, if the wife only knows how to spend money lavishly and does not know how to manage money, such a wife is a loser, and her husband's life will not be too good.

It's not superstition, because the harmony of a family mainly depends on whether the daughter-in-law will run the house.

This is not a superstition, if the daughter-in-law can save money and not spend money indiscriminately, then the family is still rich.

Not superstition. Because women are more likely to be housekeepers, as long as the daughter-in-law is good in a family, life at home will not be good.

No. Because the relationship between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law is very important in the family, if the family is harmonious, it is easy to get rich, so I don't think it's superstition.

As the saying goes:"If there is a good wife in the family, there will be blessings. "And:"Men are cash cows, women are cornucopias"

Everyone knows that in the long feudal society, the old concept of male superiority and female inferiority has always been followed, and men are the ones who work outside the house to earn money to support the family, while women are in charge of housework at home. Therefore, no matter how skilled a man is and how much money he earns, if he does not have a daughter-in-law who can live a life to run the house at homeNo matter how much money the husband earns, the daughter-in-law will squander it and waste it, making the family poor

However, if you marry a virtuous daughter-in-law, the situation is very different, not only can you marry and raise children,Filial piety to the in-laws, but also careful calculation, thrift, gather money, keep the money, the small days will be more and more prosperousThe more hope passes, the more the family will be harmonious, peaceful, and happy.

Of course, "it is difficult for a clever daughter-in-law to cook without rice", if a man can't even get rice back, how can he let his daughter-in-law cook a good meal? And vice versa, the man just moved the gold bricks back, and the daughter-in-law is also versatile if she can't keep it. It can be seen that husband and wife are concentric, and their strength is broken.

A person who is capable outside can earn money, and a family who can manage money can become rich no matter how poor he is. Therefore, whether a family can get rich or not depends on the joint efforts and hard work of the husband and wifeIn the end, we can create a rich and happy family. What do you think?

The first is because men are outside the Lord, and women are Lord. Men are mainly responsible for earning money to support the family, and then women are mainly responsible for how to manage the family better, so if a man has a good wife, he will help him manage the family in an orderly manner, so that he can earn money outside with peace of mind, and don't worry about the affairs of the family, so that he can earn more money outside. In this way, the family can be rich, but if a person marries a woman who can't even take care of housework, then he not only earns money outside but also constantly worries about the family, and everyone can't do it at the same time, so if this happens, then the man will definitely not earn too much money.

The second is because a good daughter-in-law can help her husband manage his money. Whenever her husband comes back from earning money, she will distribute the money very reasonably, and if she meets a more diligent and thrifty housekeeper, she will know how to use the money, but if she encounters a lavish spender, then she will definitely not distribute the money well, she will take all the glory and emptiness of the money, even if a man has more money, he will definitely not be able to withstand these squandering. So if a man has a good wife, his wife can help him manage the money and make him richer.

Finally, it is because the mother is the most influential child in a family. If her child inherits his mother's thrifty housekeeping, then he will not be very lavish in squandering his father's money, but if his mother is like that, his children must be like that, and the two of them will definitely squander all the money faster.

In short, "whether the family is rich or not depends mainly on the daughter-in-law." This saying is because the wife has a very strong influence in a family.

Because the daughter-in-law has to be busy with the size of the family, it can be seen from the food, clothing, food, housing and transportation that the family is rich or not.

Because in many cases, women are more good at dressing up, and those who have money must wear them well.

Because if the daughter-in-law usually dresses more luxuriously, then the family will be richer.

Because if the daughter-in-law is able enough to keep everything in order in the house, then the family will be very happy.

Because the daughters-in-law of wealthy families generally seem to be the more virtuous kind.

The meaning of this sentence is that whether the family can save money or not depends on the woman's daughter-in-law.

Because if the daughter-in-law of a family is more defeated, it may lead to the decline of the family.

The reason why this situation occurs is because a good daughter-in-law has a great role.

Because a virtuous and empathetic housekeeper will definitely help her husband to grab money.

The daughter-in-law is virtuous and virtuous, and the husband has no worries. Naturally, the family is happy, happy and healthy.

I think there are a lot of reasons, don't you think so?

Actually, this sentence makes a lot of sense. This shows that men are working hard to make money outside, not the main condition for the family to be rich or not, whether the family is rich or not, mainly depends on whether the daughter-in-law of the family will live, the daughter-in-law of the family will not live, you have earned a board and got home, the daughter-in-law has wasted a door for you, such a family, how many boards you earn, you can't earn the door that your daughter-in-law wasted for you, such a family will never get rich, will always be poor!

A woman who can live a life will not spend money indiscriminately, and if you earn a board outside, he will assemble a door for you at home. You earn 10 yuan outside, he will give you 20 yuan to spend, such a woman is careful to spend, trickle water, when it is time to spend money, he is willing to spend money, when it is time to save, he will not waste a penny, this is what we call a good woman of a prosperous family, if a man marries a good woman of such a prosperous family, the family will definitely prosper, and the family will be rich!

There is such a kind of woman, a woman called Wangjia Wangfu. There is also a kind of woman, called the loser girls, although this sentence is a bit unpleasant, the women who can spend money and dare to spend money are also willing to bear this "good name", they are even proud of spending more money, proud of being able to spend money, proud of daring to spend money, they will even say that women who spend more money, can spend money, and dare to spend money are real women, because only in this way can they promote their men to earn money and spend more desperately for them, in order to promote social economic development, in order to make this society more prosperous!

In rural areas, if the family is living a good life and the family is relatively wealthy, there must be a good daughter-in-law who is diligent and thrifty. If anyone marries such a daughter-in-law, it is very difficult for you to make your family rich, so the saying in the countryside that "whether the family is rich or not, mainly depends on the daughter-in-law", is still very reasonable!

See if there is a particularly virtuous wife in the family, if there is such a wife, it is to make the family richer.

First of all, it is necessary to see whether the daughter-in-law is a person in charge, to see how the daughter-in-law means, and to see whether the daughter-in-law is gentle and virtuous.

The position of the woman in a family is very important, and if the woman can control the economy of the family, then there will be a good development.

Is the phrase "whether the family is rich or not, mainly depends on the daughter-in-law" reasonable? I don't think that's reasonable.

Whether a family is rich or not is not just a matter of one person, it is generally a matter of both husband and wife. Unless one of them is very powerful, he will make his family rich by himself.

As the saying goes: there is a rake to earn money outside, and there must be a box to save money at home. The meaning is: men are the main force in the family to earn money, mainly responsible for earning money, reflecting a diligent person; Women are mainly responsible for collecting and saving money, and they can't waste it, which reflects a thrift.

Although this sentence is somewhat different from the habits of modern people, the principle of diligence and thrift in it is still very practical.

If in a family, the man is very capable, can stand alone, and achieve a career; The woman in the family, who started a business with him, became a good assistant to him. Such a family can get rich, husband and wife work together, and its profits will be broken.

If the woman in the family is a strong woman, very capable, and can make her family rich through her hard work. At this time, the man either became a woman's helper, or had his own career.

Such families are generally relatively stable, and there are reasons why they can get rich. Because both sides are working hard, can they not be rich?

If one of them, can earn a lot of money. But on the other hand, it is spending money lavishly. So. Because of the serious waste, the family will still not get rich.

Therefore, the prosperity of a family still depends on the efforts of two people. If you rely on one side alone, then this capable person is very hard.

Therefore, the sentence "whether the family is rich or not depends mainly on the daughter-in-law" is unreasonable. Men should not put the burden of earning money on the heads of their daughters-in-law. From ancient times to the present, men, but what about the main force in the family?

I think it makes a lot of sense. Here's a joke about a zoo where you can cross a crocodile pond and get a reward of 1 million for those who survive and two million for the dead. There are many people watching the results, and no one wants to try it.

At this time, a man suddenly jumped into the crocodile pond and swam to the opposite bank, and the organizer gave him a prize with both hands, and interviewed him why he had such courage? He cried and asked, "Who pushed me down?!" His wife smiled and nodded at him.

This shows that behind a successful man, there must be a successful woman who can "push" a man at a critical moment.

There is also a story I heard about a male star who was popular when he was popular, and when he expired, he was very down. Just as he expressed to his wife that he might not be popular again and could not give her a good life, his wife told him that she had used their savings and his fame to invest in a mine, which meant that they would have a continuous income for the rest of their lives. This is the old saying, the husband has a money-earner, and the family has a money-bearing bucket.

There is also a saying, a good wife is rich for three generations!