What should I do if the rescued person does not admit it after saving someone?

First, saving people is a noble act of righteousness and bravery, I don't care about the evaluation of others, often many heroes save people but quietly leave, indicating the greatness of the rescuer, second, although the rescuer does not value the gains and losses, but if the rescued do not admit it, it is chilling for everyone, in order to maintain the positive energy of the society, the rescuer can choose to call the police, report to the **, let the relevant departments investigate and collect evidence, determine the facts, in order to promote the good and punish the evil, and expose the ugly face of the treacherous villain.

Hello, friends!

Saving people is also about saving other people's lives, and I don't think about it so much. If others don't admit it, they won't admit it. If you think the truth of this kind of thing is important, then gather evidence.

First of all, the rescued person is not of good character, and we first condemn him from the moral aspect.

Secondly, do you mean to save him by sending him to the hospital to pay for medical expenses, or is it like the other party drowning and you save people (the difference is that you spend money on the former, and you don't spend money on the latter).

Then there is no way, unless there is evidence and physical evidence, although it is not for anything to save people, but it is really hurtful to be denied, which is why some people are so indifferent, saving people is denied, saving people is wronged.

The other party also died, and the police were also called, and the public security bureau determined that the righteous and courageous act was given 10,000 yuan, and the news was also broadcast, and the rescuer was 13 years old and died at that time.

If there is evidence for this, it will do.

Ask him how he was rescued.

Legal analysis: It is necessary to judge according to the specific circumstances, and under normal circumstances, if there is no fault in the rescue, it will not be liable.

Where it is presumed that the perpetrator is at fault in accordance with the provisions of law, and he cannot prove that he is not at fault, he shall bear tort liability.

From a legal point of view, unrelated individuals have no obligation or responsibility to save people, so saving half of them is not illegal. As long as there is no obligation to help, even if you do not save in the face of death, it will not constitute a crime, but if a person who has an obligation to help does not help when she can, it will constitute a crime. The former does not constitute a crime.

The latter is intentional homicide. Because the former stunned the other party in the process of rescue constituted legitimate defense, and the latter actor was already incapacitated, there is no possibility of expectation. The latter is intentional homicide.

There is an example of the latter of the same nature, A passes by the river, sees someone, and throws a rope at him, and by this time the person who has fallen into the water B is out of danger. But halfway through, A discovers that it is enemy B, and lets go of the rope again, and B falls into a new danger and dies. And A does not have any justifiable reason to hinder the act or responsibility, so A is intentional homicide.

"Crime of omission" refers to conduct in which the perpetrator violates the direct provisions of the law, bears a legally-prescribed obligation and refuses to perform, and the circumstances are serious or heinous. To briefly summarize the crime of omission, it can be described in six words as what should be done, what can be done, and what not to do. In terms of its legal characteristics, it is hidden, negative, indirect and illegal.

1. It is the obligation expressly stipulated in the law, such as the obligation of the police to protect the property and personal safety of citizens in the performance of official duties;

2. It is a business requirement, such as the duty doctor has the obligation to rescue critically ill patients;

3. Obligations arising from legal acts, for example, a nanny hired to take care of a child for another person has an obligation to take care of the child and protect it from accidental injury;

4. It is an obligation arising from a prior act, such as an obligation to send a person to a hospital for treatment if a person is injured in a traffic accident.

Legal basis

Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 183:Where oneself is harmed by protecting the civil rights and interests of others, the infringer bears civil liability, and the beneficiary may give appropriate compensation. Where there is no infringer, the infringer has escaped, or is unable to bear civil liability, and the victim requests compensation, the beneficiary shall give appropriate compensation.

Article 184:Where harm is caused to the aid recipient as a result of voluntarily carrying out emergency assistance, the rescuer does not bear civil liability.

1. Saving people is an instinct and a virtue.

When we see someone in danger or distress, our first reaction is often to want to reach out and help them out of the situation. It is a human instinct and a social virtue. We all want to be a kind, courageous, and righteous person who can help and support others in their time of need.

This act of saving lives reflects our respect and love for life, as well as our responsibility and contribution to society.

Second, there are risks and costs associated with saving lives.

However, saving people is not an easy or risk-free thing. Sometimes, saving others can endanger one's own safety and life, and may even sacrifice oneself. In this case, saving people requires a great price and sacrifice.

This kind of cost and sacrifice affects not only oneself, but also one's family, relatives and friends. They may lose a loved one, a friend, a pillar. They may feel grief, anger, helplessness, and doubt.

They may feel that their loved ones have wasted their lives for someone who doesn't deserve it.

3. Save people according to your ability.

Therefore, saving people is not a simple matter of regretting a loss, nor is it an unconditional thing. Saving people should be judged and decided according to specific circumstances and conditions. To save people, we must do what we can, not blindly impulsive, nor indifferent and ruthless.

To save people, we should consider our own ability and safety, as well as the wishes and consequences of the rescued. To save people, we must have reason and courage, but also compassion and respect.

Fourth, saving people deserves respect and praise.

In any case, those who sacrificed their lives to save the lives of those who did so are heroes who deserve our respect and praise. They show a selfless and great spirit, they use their lives to save the lives of others, and they use their actions to convey a positive energy and hope. They may not have thought that they would die, they may just be thinking about saving a life.

They may not have thought about how much pain they would bring to their family, they may just be thinking.

Hello, saving people in danger is one of the noble manifestations of human morality, and for a society, this spirit is even more priceless. However, sacrificing oneself in order to save others requires careful consideration. Here are some relevant analyses and reflections:

1. First of all, there is nothing wrong with saving people, but it is not wise to sacrifice yourself to save people. In dangerous situations, timely and effective rescue measures are often required, and if a person does not have the ability to rescue, he should not take the risk to save people. In the face of emergencies, the judge should mobilize the resources around him and try to avoid personal heroism.

Of course, if you are a professional rescuer with the appropriate skills and equipment, it is your duty to save people, and such an act can be said to be honorable.

2. Secondly, sacrificing oneself to save others is also irresponsible to the family and society. Saving lives is a moral act, but everyone also has their own responsibilities and obligations. If a person sacrifices his own life, he will bring a heavy burden and suffering to his family and relatives and friends, which is undoubtedly irresponsible.

In society, there is also a need for talents in all aspects, and if a person sacrifices his life because of his actions, it is also a loss to society.

3. Finally, the act of sacrificing oneself to save others is not inevitable, nor is it the only manifestation of human morality. There are many ways and means to save people, which can be donations or organizing rescues, etc., and do not have to cost lives. In addition, in modern society, many emergencies require professional rescue teams and equipment, and we should actively support and participate in these teams to become more valuable people.

In short, saving people is a great act, but sacrificing oneself to save others is not a wise move, and we need to look at this issue with a more rational attitude. In the face of emergencies, we should think calmly, mobilize the resources around us, and never take risks, which is a responsible attitude towards ourselves, our families and society.

Good luck.