The equation about x 3 2x x 3 2 m x 3 x 1 has no solution, find the value of m.

Updated on science 2024-04-25
9 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Well, there is no square in the process, and the value of m is not 3

    Solution: 3-2x) (x-3)+(2+mx) (3-x)=-13-2x) (x-3)-(2+mx) (x-3)=-1 multiplied by (x-3) on both sides at the same time

    3-2x)-(2+mx)=-(x-3)

    3-2x-2-mx=-x+3

    x-mx=2

    1+m)x=2

    x=-2/(m+1)

    Classification discussion, to make the original equation unsolved, 1) x = 3 (x = 3 is the root of the equation), obtain.

    1+m)*3=2

    m=-5/3.

    2) 1+m=0, then the value of x is meaningless, m=-1, in summary, when m=-1 and -5 3, the original equation has no solution.

    What is the title, is it okay to add some parentheses to 3-2x x-3+2+mx 3-x=-1? I can ask and hope it can help you.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Solution: 3-2x) (x-3)+(2+mx) (3-x)=-13-2x) (x-3)-(2+mx) (x-3)=-13-2x)-(2+mx)=-(x-3).

    3-2x-2-mx=-x+3

    x-mx=2

    1+m)x=2···

    To make the original equation unsolved, let x=3 (x=3 is the root of the equation), get.

    1+m)*3=2

    m=-5/3.

    In addition, for the equation, if 1+m=0, then x=0, but at this time, the two sides of the original equation are unequal, so x≠0, so to make the original equation unsolved, just make 1+m=0, that is, m=-1, in summary, when m=-1 and -5 3, the original equation has no solution.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    3-2x/x-3+2+mx/3-x=-1

    Multiply the two sides of the equation by x-3.

    3-2x-2-mx=-(x-3)

    1-m)x=2

    When -1-m=0 or x=3 (root resistance), none of the original equations are solved.

    When -1-m=0, then m=-1

    When x=3 (Zengchang lacks brother root), (-1-m)*3=2, then m=-5 3 So when m=-1 or m=-5 3, the equation 3-2x x-3+2+mx 3-x=-1 has no solution.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Knowing that x=-2 is the solution of the equation (x+m)-(mx-3)=3x about x, then substituting x=-2 into the equation (x+m)-(mx-3)=3x obtains:

    2+m)-(2m-3)=3*(-2)-2+m+2m+3=-6

    m=-7/3

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Solution: 3-2x) (x-3)+(2+mx) (3-x)=-13-2x) (x-3)-(2+mx) (x-3)=-13-2x)-(2+mx)=-(x-3).

    3-2x-2-mx=-x+3

    x-mx=2

    1+m)x=2···

    To make the original equation unsolvable, let x=3 do, and get.

    1+m)*3=2

    m=-5/3.

    In addition, for the formula, if 1+m=0, then x=0, but at this time, the two sides of the original equation are unequal, so x≠0, so to make the original square range unsolved, just make 1+m=0 that is, m=-1, to sum up, when m=-1 and -5 3, the original equation has no solution.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    3-2x/x-3+2-mx/3-x=﹣1

    3-2x+mx-2=3-x;

    m-1)x=2;

    x=2/(m-1);

    So 2 (m-1)=3;

    m-1=2/3;

    m=5/3;

    Please remember to praise if it helps, please re-post questions for new questions, and new questions will not be answered, thank you!!

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Multiply by x-3.

    3-2x)-(2-mx)=3-x

    3-2x-2+mx=3-x

    3-2x-2+mx=3-x

    mx-2x+x=2

    m-1)x=2

    If there is no solution, then. m-1=0 or solution as root-increasing x=3

    m=1x=3.

    3(m-1)=2

    m-1=2/3

    m=5 3, so m=1 or m=5 3

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The equation has no solution is to tell you that the root formula of the above equation is less than 0. The equation for finding the root is less than 0, and this inequality is the value of m.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    The basic steps of the fractional equation solution method can be simplified to the following criteria.

    x-mx-2=0

    When x=3, the equation is unsolved:

    3-3m-2=0

    m=-5/3

Related questions
22 answers2024-04-25

2、(2003?Yancheng) is known to have the equation for x2+2(2-m) x+3-6m=0 >>>More

14 answers2024-04-25

1.Junior solution: because the coefficient before x 2 is greater than 0, the axis of symmetry = 3 4, that is, the minimum value is taken when x = 3 4, f(3 4) = -9 16-m makes f(3 4)>0 get m<-9 16, because f(-1) = 1 + 3 2-m, f(1) = -1 2-m has f(-1) > f(1). >>>More

6 answers2024-04-25

The 32-inch Sony new 32D300A is good, but the price is really expensive, about 11000. I bought Sharp's 32bk7, which is good overall, but it still has all kinds of defects. >>>More

11 answers2024-04-25

The original formula is equivalent to.

2(x-a/2)|+x+3|≥2x+4 >>>More

4 answers2024-04-25

There are several main aspects to this problem:

If you use a pirated system, there is a possibility that such a problem will occur, it is recommended: use the genuine version. >>>More