Hemudu is 7,000 years old, can it be said that the southern part of the Chinese civilization is earl

Hemudu has a history of 7,000 years, but it cannot be said that the southern part of the Chinese civilization is earlier than the north, and the Hemudu site has the title of the first village on the southeast coast, but there are actually many sites earlier than the Hemudu site. In the north, there have been many sites earlier than the Hemudu site, such as the Xushui Nanzhuangtou site in Hebei, or the Donghulin site in Beijing, and the Xinghuiwa site in Inner Mongolia, which are many years earlier than the Hemudu site, and are about 10,000 to 8,000 years ago. So, but from this point of view, it cannot be said that the civilization of China, the south is earlier than the north.

However, in terms of cultural origin, the world archaeological community has recognized that the birthplace of Chinese culture is the Majiabin culture in Zhejiang. More than 7,000 years ago, the people of Majiabin in Zhejiang Province have begun to plant rice on a large scale, and Emperor Yan in the north taught the people of the north to plant rice more than 4,500 years ago. <>

The Chinese civilization has a very characteristic thing, that is, the dragon, in the Central Plains, the totem of Emperor Yan is the cow, the totem of Chiyou is the cow bird, and the totem of Baiyue is the dragonBaiyue is the area of Zhejiang, Fujian, Guangdong, and Guizhou, so although Hemudu has a history of 7,000 years, it cannot be said that the southern part of the Chinese civilization is earlier than the north, but it can prove that the southern part of the Chinese civilization is earlier than the north to another extent.

At the same time, Zhejiang is the only birthplace of Chinese civilization and is recognized by the world, so this is an indisputable fact and there is no need to prove anything.

I think that although there are 7,000 years of Hemudo, this is not enough to prove that the southern part of the Chinese civilization is earlier than the north, because there are many sites earlier than the Hemudu site.

Hemudu has a cultural history of 7,000 years, which can obviously show that the Chinese civilization was earlier than the north, and archaeologists have also come to this basis.

I think so, because the most important thing about the origin of civilization is the beginning, so to speak.

It cannot be said that Hemudu is 7,000 years old, that is, the southern Chinese civilization was earlier than the north, because there are many places that were much earlier than he discovered.

It cannot be said that the south is earlier than the north through Hemudu, and the Yangshao culture in the Central Plains and Hemudu are from the same period, both belonging to the Neolithic Age.

It is not possible to compare it in this way, it can only be said that the time of the survival of the characters was discovered, but it is impossible to conclude in this way about culture.

The Hemudu civilization has a history of 7,000 years, but this does not represent the Chinese civilization, the south is earlier than the north. Because there are other ruins than the Hemudu people tomorrow morning.

This statement is too absolute, because there are many civilizations in the north that are earlier than those in the south.

It's okay, but the Chinese civilization is a whole.

What you are talking about is Chinese history, and it is also the origin of the Chinese nation and the birthplace of culture. To say that the 5,000-year history of China is just a general term, and there is no need to stick to one statement, because China's history has a long history and is of great significance to research.

You first distinguish between prehistory and the history of civilization, and then talk about other things. 5,000 years is the history of civilization after the emergence of the state.

The Hemudu civilization was even earlier, it began 5,000-7,000 years ago. The last Mayan era began in 3113 BC.

Hemudu is relatively early, and the Mayan civilization appeared much later.

The Hemudu culture dates from 5000 BC to 7000 BC. It is the site of a clan village from the Neolithic matriarchal clan commune period, reflecting the situation of the clans in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River about 7,000 years ago.

The Mayan civilization is the ancient Indian civilization of Latin America, an outstanding representative of the ancient Indian civilization of the Americas, named after the Indian Maya. Formed around 1500 BC, the Maya created the glorious Mayan civilization.

So the Hemudu civilization predates the Mayan civilization by at least 3,500 years.

Hemudu, Hemudu civilization is a civilization of the Neolithic period.

Hemudu, the former in the Neolithic period BC, the latter in the 14th century.

Zhejiang belongs to the south.

The southern region refers to the southern part of the monsoon region in eastern China, mainly the area south of the Qinling-Huaihe River, the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in the west, the Yellow Sea, the East China Sea and the South China Sea in the east and south respectively, and the length of the continental coastline accounts for more than 2 3 percent of the country. The administrative division includes most of Jiangsu, most of Anhui, Zhejiang, Shanghai, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi, Fujian, most of Yunnan, Guizhou, eastern Sichuan, Chongqing, southern Shaanxi, Guangxi, Guangdong, Hong Kong, Macao, Hainan, Taiwan, southeastern Gansu and Xinyang and Nanyang in Henan.

Zhejiang is the south, he is on this side of the Qinhuai River.

The south of the Yangtze River was bounded by the Qinling Mountains and the Huai River, not the Yangtze River.

The south and north of China are bounded by the Qinling Huai River, with the north of the Qinling Huai River being the north and the south being the south. Zhejiang is already south of the Yangtze River, of course, in the south.

In fact, it is even worse.

International historiography is more about accurate historical evidence than about legends. The so-called history of civilization requires a historical record with an exact time and chronology. Unfortunately, the exact chronology of China's history began with the republican rule of the Western Zhou Dynasty.

That is to say, before that, China's historical chronology was either vacant or contradictory. Therefore, the only thing that can be generally recognized in the international historical community is the republican government until 841 BC. All the history of China before that, because there is no exact date, can only be judged according to "legends".

That is, what is really logically proven, recognized by the West, is only 2800 years.

But! Obviously, this is only because the historical records have not kept up, and it does not mean that there was no Chinese civilization before 841 BC. Therefore, what to judge by what historical events is the starting point of Chinese civilization has become a matter of opinion between the benevolent and the wise.

Because the production of writing began at least in the Shang Dynasty. Therefore, the emergence of Chinese civilization should be no later than the Shang Dynasty. Even so, it is only more than 3,000 years old.

Some people also say that the Xia Dynasty started to kill Boyi and establish a family world. In fact, this statement may be acceptable to Chinese, but foreigners do not see it that way. Because given the traffic situation at that time, in fact, it was completely impossible to create a large area of the country, which would be managed in a unified manner.

Therefore, the Xia Dynasty was simply unable to carry out unified management and deployment in a wide area. Therefore, it can only be counted as a tribal alliance. It is even difficult to determine whether the chairman of a large chieftain who has not even written down a loose tribal alliance is self-appointed or if it is something else.

It is difficult to convince foreigners to take it as a starting point. Even if the founding of the Xia Dynasty (21st century BC) is judged to be the starting point, the Chinese civilization is only 4,000 years old.

Then came the even more legendary Yanhuang era. Due to the lack of physical evidence, coupled with the description of historical records in this part, it is closer to mythological stories, which leads foreigners to scoff at it even more. Because the Yellow Emperor - Yao - Shun - Yu - Qi, which is the lineage of the Chinese tribe, considering the health status and longevity of human beings at that time, the Yellow Emperor was at most 200 years earlier than Qi.

Moreover, the historical records record that these old gentlemen have lived to be 100-200 years old, and it is obvious that the authenticity has been greatly reduced. However, the historical records say that the existence of the Yellow Emperor should be nearly 1,000 years earlier than Qi. So the saying of 5,000 years of civilization history comes from this.

Then some people believe that the starting point of civilization should be judged to be the beginning of the emergence of cities, or the beginning of the cultivation of food crops. So the Hemudu civilization 7,000 years ago became the starting point of civilization in the eyes of these people. Because rice was found in the ruins of the Hemudu civilization.

This means that this is not a nomadic people, but a long-term settlement and a civilization that cultivates rice.

There is a clear historical record of the time in the historical materials is the Yin Shang period before 2000 BC, because the age is too old, the earlier Chinese history lacks historical records, most of the recorded are fragmentary legends, although some relics or cultural relics of the Xia Dynasty have also been unearthed, but the evidence is insufficient, can not fully prove that the Xia Dynasty really existed.

We say that 5000 years is actually an exaggeration, the earliest written record in China is about 3500 years ago wizards divination a few symbols, the earliest history of letters began in the first year of the Western Zhou Republic, about 2800 years ago. On the one hand, we do not believe in the Homeric epics recorded in the Greek population 800 years later, and on the other hand, we are convinced of Sima Qian's historical records, which is a correct double standard. The Xia Dynasty is a concept invented by contemporary people, and there is no evidence of Erlitou cultural sites that can appear to be the palace of the Xia Dynasty.

If Erlitou is considered a dynasty, there are still 12,000-year-old Gobekri ruins in Turkey. Moreover, compared with the rammed earth grass houses in Erlitou, Gobekli is a huge stone pillar structure with an average height of three or four meters. Therefore, in many cases, you can't be arrogant or arrogant.

What happened to China, which is 3,500 years old? The United States is only 300 years old, and it is still the world hegemon.

Not to mention 7,000 years, even the 5,000 years of the old boast rely on legends, and it is difficult to make up enough faith and history. That Xia Shang Zhou Dynasty project pigtails are full of loopholes, and it is impossible to justify himself.

In fact, what really has an exact historical record in China can only be pushed back to the Zhou Dynasty.

It was probably around 800 B.C., so it was necessary to carry out the Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties project, as for the previous three emperors and five emperors, it is difficult to study.

But the Chinese civilization is one of the many ancient civilizations that has survived.

It should be 7,000 years, because there are 8,000 years of records of Mongolia, and there are records that there was a Chinese culture around Okinawa, Japan as early as 7,000 years ago. The 5,000 years we are talking about today may have been calculated from the beginning of the Zhou Dynasty.

History is a vague concept, generally referring to the history of civilization, but the history of civilization is also a vague concept, in fact, the definite history of civilization in China is about 4200 years.

The other 2,000 years is the Hongshan culture, which has pushed China forward for 2,000 years for 5,000 years!

Foreign scholars believe that it was around 3000 years, and Japanese scholars believe that it was around 3500 years.

Haha, there is a record point of the Shang Dynasty.

China has excavated pottery 20,000 years ago, planted 10,000 years ago, written 8,000 years ago, and cities 7,000 years ago, so the Yu Dynasty and the ancient Tang Dynasty should have existed before the Xia Dynasty.

There are currently three mainstream theories about the length of Chinese history:

1) Counting from the legendary era of the Three Emperors and Five Emperors, in the early 4000s, known as 5000, ** in China's official and semi-official (not necessarily party) propaganda;

2) from the beginning of the Shang Dynasty, which is about 3,600 years old, according to the definition of the history of civilization;

3) Counting from the beginning of the first political dynasty Qin, 2200 years ago, it was originally ** with the British historian Toynbee.

China has a long history, since the founding of the Xia Dynasty Dayu (a said Xia Qi) to the present, it is indeed less than 5,000 years, which is the exact age obtained by experts. What foreign countries believe is the history that really exists. However, there is still a long period of legendary history in the prehistory of our Chinese nation, that is, the period of the Three Emperors and the Five Emperors.

It is said that the reign of the emperor was 3000 BC, so even if you don't count the three emperors, China has a history of 5,000 years.

Chinese history spans about 3,600 years since the Shang Dynasty, 4,000 years since the Xia Dynasty, and 4,700 years since the time of the Yellow Emperor. Some historians believe that in the history of human civilization, the definition of "historical era" refers to the time when writing was invented, and before that it is called "prehistoric era"; In history, it is said that Fuxi made gossip, and Cangjie made words in the Yellow Emperor era; Modern archaeology has discovered oracle bone inscriptions from the Shang Dynasty more than 3,350 years ago (1,350 BC), pottery inscriptions from about 3,000 to 4,000 years ago, and tortoise bone inscriptions with a written nature from about 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.

In this sense, the Shang Dynasty can be regarded as the true beginning of Chinese history. According to the requirements of historiography, history must not only be supported by historical materials, but also archaeological evidence, and the Shang Dynasty, as the beginning of Chinese history, meets these two requirements, but the Xia Dynasty has not been officially confirmed because there is no recognized written basis for the existence of the Xia Dynasty in archaeology so far (the earliest written record in China is from the Shang Dynasty). As a certain need, we might as well recognize, but as an academic issue, there is a controversy about whether the source of Chinese history is Xia or commerce.

The landlord here must not confuse the beginning of civilization with the beginning of history. In anthropology and archaeology, civilization refers to an area that is inhabited and has a certain economic culture, such as the Lianghe civilization and the Yellow River civilization. The requirements of civilization are obviously a little lower than those of history.

The so-called 5,000-year history of civilization is calculated downward from the era of the legendary Yellow Emperor. According to ancient records, the Yellow Emperor invented writing, boats, cars, clothes, palaces, and so on. When Sima Qian wrote the "Historical Records", he saw Confucius's "Zai Yu Asks the Five Emperors" and "Imperial Surname".

There is a lot about the Yellow Emperor, but scholars at the time often did not believe it. Sima Qian then "west to Kongtong, north through Zhuolu, east to the sea, south to the Jianghuai", everywhere he went, the local elders mentioned to him the Yellow Emperor, Yao, Shun left behind the historical sites, often consistent with the literature. Sima Qian re-read "Spring and Autumn" and "Chinese" and found that there were many mutual inventions with "Zai Yu Asked Five Emperors" and so on.

Sima Qian then synthesized the historical relics of the Yellow Emperor, Zhuan, Emperor Yu, Yao, and Shun, and wrote the "Five Emperors Benji", which was included in the first "Historical Records" as the beginning of the history of Chinese civilization. Therefore, the Chinese regard the Yellow Emperor as the first ancestor of humanity.

The Yellow Emperor's age is comparable to the archaeological late Neolithic period. The Hemudu site in Yuyao, Zhejiang, and the Cishan site in Wu'an, Hebei Province prove that as early as 7,000 years ago, the north and south of China were already in a relatively developed era of agricultural civilization. The moat is an important symbol of the age of civilization.

In recent years, archaeologists have discovered dozens of Neolithic city sites across the country.

Therefore, it is basically credible to say that China has a history of 5,000 years of civilization.