Does the fact that parents are listed as old men affect their children s education?

Parents are listed as old friends, and in principle, there is no impact on the child's education. After all, a series of sanctions against Lao Lai are mainly aimed at those who maliciously borrow money and do not repay them. So don't have too much pressure as a child, you study well and enter the social work a day earlier, which can also relieve the financial pressure of your parents.

This situation will definitely affect the child's further education, because for some schools, if the parents are lai, they will definitely be restricted, even if the child's grades are good, they will not be able to go to school, so the parents are called lai, which can be said to ruin the child's life.

There has never been a situation in which the children of "old friends" have been prevented from going to university. : Children cannot attend high-fee private schools. This is mainly to limit the high consumption of the lai, and the right of the lai's children to education in ordinary schools is still protected by law, that is, the lai's children can go to university, but the overly expensive university may be restricted.

However, more and more units and departments will now use information on untrustworthiness to carry out joint credit punishment against judgment defaulters.

Parents are listed as old men, that is, they are included in the list of dishonest persons, and they are usually those who refuse to carry out the law after being sentenced by the court, and their children's education and job search will be affected.

Lai lai will affect his children's schooling. There is a provision in the "Several Provisions on Restricting High Consumption and Related Consumption by Judgment Debtors" that the children of the elderly cannot attend high-fee private schools.

This is mainly to limit the high consumption of the lai, and the right of the lai's children to education in ordinary schools is still protected by law, that is, the lai's children can go to university.

Legal Analysis: There is no such provision. Parents are the most old-fashioned, that is, they restrict their children from attending high-fee private schools, and normal national compulsory education schools are not affected.

Legal basis: "Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Publication of Information on the List of Judgment Defaulters" Article 1: Where persons subject to enforcement fail to perform the obligations set forth in effective legal documents, and in any of the following circumstances, the people's courts shall include them in the list of judgment defaulters, and give them credit punishments in accordance with law:

1) Refusal to perform obligations set forth in effective legal documents despite having the ability to perform;

2) Obstructing or resisting enforcement by means such as fabricating evidence, violence, or threats;

3) Evading enforcement by means such as sham litigation or arbitration, or concealment or transfer of assets;

4) Violating the property reporting system;

5) Violating an order restricting spending;

6) Refusal to perform on the enforcement of a settlement agreement without a legitimate reason.

Lao Lai will affect his children's schooling, for example, his children will not be able to attend private schools, such as Gao Jinran's fee-charging private school is one of the high consumption prohibited by judgment defaulters, and Lao Lai's children will go to public schools that can only go to compulsory education, but it will not affect other matters related to further education.

Article 1 of the Supreme People's Court's Several Provisions on the Publication of Information on the List of Judgment Defaulters: Where persons subject to enforcement fail to perform the obligations set forth in effective legal documents, and have any of the following circumstances, the people's courts shall include them in the list of judgment defaulters, and give them credit punishments in accordance with law: (1) Those who have the ability to perform but refuse to perform the obligations set forth in the effective legal documents; 2) Obstructing or resisting enforcement by means such as fabricating evidence, violence, or threats; 3) Evading enforcement by means such as sham litigation or arbitration, or concealment or transfer of assets;