My friend hurt someone, I didn t do it, am I responsible? Hurry, hurry

You are responsible, because you were present at the time, and the person who was the person by your side was a friend, at least a cover-up. According to China's criminal law, this crime can be sentenced to up to three years in prison or criminal detention. This crime is very light, and if you now go to the public security organ and turn yourself in, your punishment can be appropriately reduced or exempted.

It's none of your business, rest assured! When the police ask you to record a statement, you have to tell the truth.

1. Article 14 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases stipulates that: "If a helper suffers personal injury from his or her activities, the aided worker shall be liable for compensation. If the assisted worker explicitly refuses to help, he shall not be liable for compensation; However, appropriate compensation may be provided within the scope of benefits.

2. The appropriate compensation liability of the helper when the helper is injured belongs to the application of equitable responsibility in the theory of civil law, and it is a special specific situation for the application of equitable responsibility. Article 157 of the Supreme Court's Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Implementation of the General Principles of the Civil Law (for Trial Implementation) also stipulates this. The judicial interpretation further makes clear provisions.

Equitable liability refers to the form of tort liability in which both parties fairly share the losses according to the actual circumstances and possibilities, taking fair consideration as the standard when the damage has already occurred. Article 132 of the General Principles of the Civil Law stipulates that if the parties are not at fault for the damages, the parties may share the civil liability according to the actual circumstances. This is the legal confirmation of the duty of fairness under our civil law.

You two share the burden, after all, you're doing him a favor.

If this is your own volition, if you are fully responsible, you can't talk about it.

Helping a friend fight with the other party was seriously injured, but he didn't do it, and he didn't know how he participated, and he was legally responsible for this decision.

Article 25 of the Criminal Law stipulates that "joint crime refers to the joint intentional crime committed by two or more persons".

Where two or more persons commit a joint negligent crime, it is not to be treated as a joint crime; Those who shall bear criminal responsibility are to be punished separately according to the crimes they committed.

Article 26 of the Criminal Law stipulates that a person who organizes a criminal group or leads a criminal group to carry out criminal activities, or who plays a major role in a joint crime, is the principal offender.

A relatively fixed criminal organization formed by three or more persons for the purpose of jointly committing a crime is a criminal group.

The ringleaders who organize or lead a criminal group are to be punished in accordance with all the crimes committed by the group.

For principal offenders other than those provided for in paragraph 3, punishment shall be given in accordance with all crimes in which they were instructed to accompany and participate, or who organized or directed.

Article 27 of the Criminal Law stipulates that an accessory is an accomplice who plays a secondary or auxiliary role in a joint crime.

For accomplices, punishment shall be mitigated, commuted, or waived.