Now the Nikon D300S has gone up, so you have to hurry up. How should I match the lens?

It is recommended to buy 17 55

D300S is an APS C secondary machine, and the focal length coefficient will be *24 70 Although it is the mirror emperor, it is very embarrassing to go to the focal length on the non-full-frame machine because of the magnification of *, so it has caused an embarrassing situation that the telephoto is not telephoto, and the wide angle is not wide.

And the 17 55 lens just achieves a small wide-angle + mid-focus focal length of a full-frame camera on the D300S and D7000.

And very suitable for hang-up, whether it is a landscape, or a portrait. No problem.

Speaking of application, in fact, I think that it is necessary to practice a lot, and if the focal length is enough, it is applicable.

The delicacy and color you are talking about are not far between the two machines, and the colors of Nikon's machines are already very full and very sharp. Therefore, it is recommended that you use the 17 55 whether you choose the D300S or the D7000, it is a good match.

Both lenses are very good, because Nikon's full-frame machine developed later than Canon, so Nikon pays great attention to the design of the top-of-the-line APS-C format lens, and the 17 55 is very good in imaging, and the machine with DX format must be 17 55.

Don't worry, buy a set of machines first.

First of all, the D300S is produced outside Japan, and the price increase should not be, so JS borrows the price increase.

The D300S is an DX format camera that should be paired with a 17-55 DX lens.

The D700 is an FX format camera and should be equipped with 24-70 lenses. This is how it plays its part.

It's a lot worse The main body of the building is generally in place in one step, buy it better, you only need to spend money to buy a lens in the future, and you have to consider the problem of replacing the fuselage when the time comes. D300S's current evaluation is no less than that of full frame, D90 is far worse The limited budget is temporary, but if you buy a bad one, you should be depressed for a long time Anyway, if you have to invest in lenses in the future, don't deliberately use your budget to suppress your hobbies.

If you only choose from 24 70 or 17 55, the imaging quality of the 24 70 is better, and the fuselage is D300S, and the feel and function of D300S are slightly better.

Don't choose a lens blindly, just use a sleeve for beginners, when the technology is good, needless to say, you will know what subject matter you like to shoot, you will know what lens you need, technology is more important than the machine, shoot more and practice more, and the sleeve can produce a good film! Hope I find it helpful!

It is certain that the 17-55 is more suitable for the D300s and D7000 because this head is the standard change head of the DX camera.

The 24-70 is the standard variable head for FX cameras.

In fact, the two heads are only different in focal length.

It is still recommended to buy the D300S after all, it is more high-end than the D7000.

The Nikon D3200 is an entry-level DSLR camera with good performance and relatively affordability**, making it ideal for beginners. Here are some reviews and features about this camera:

Easy to operate: The camera has easy-to-operate menus and shortcut keys, making it ideal for beginners.

Lightweight and compact: The Nikon D3200 is relatively lightweight and easy to carry, making it ideal for travel or outdoor photography.

Poor high-sensitivity performance: The Nikon D3200's high-sensitivity performance is not as good as some high-end cameras, so noise and other issues can occur in low-light conditions.

About 1400 yuan is a relatively normal range, but the specific ** also needs to be judged in combination with different regions, sales platforms and camera color and other factors. As an entry-level camera, the Nikon D3200 is a great option to help newbies get started quickly and master photography skills.

Photography is a comprehensive art, theoretically Nikon D3200 such a high-pixel machine will have higher requirements for the lens, at least a good lens can play a higher value. But there's a very tangled place here.,How can people who will be bull-heads,How would they buy an entry-level machine like D3200?。。。 Far from it, having a good lens is of course more advantageous to this machine than not having a good lens.

The first thing that affects the quality of ** is the user's basic photography technology, and the head behind the fuselage is much more important than the head in front.

D3200Although the pixels are OK, the configuration is very uneven, so I generally don't recommend this machine to people.

After the technology has reached a certain level, the idea of photography has become the decisive factor, which is why the sugar water tablets look good, but they can't enter the eyes of the master...

A lot of good ** needs timing, experienced players or photographers can foresee the possibility of good ** in advance and prepare, many big scenes are the result of waiting for days or even months.

In addition to this, the later stage is also crucial. In the film era, some exhibitors** often take a week to develop, and a good ** in the digital age is also carefully retouched.

In short, D3200 can play a greater advantage with a good lens, but a good lens is not a sufficient condition for D3200 to produce a good film, nor is it a necessary condition.

Since it is an entry-level machine, don't spend too much time on the equipment, take pictures quietly, and gain more.

Let me add the views of the above two, if you continue to plan to play SLR, D3200 is just used to learn to get started, then you can buy a good head, at most, you can take the 3200 out and then enter a higher-end fuselage to match those good heads. Also, to put it simply, using a good head to shoot is theoretically better than an ordinary head, but it also depends on the technology, a good photographer with the most ordinary lens to shoot**may be better than those who only buy expensive and don't buy the right ones to show off their wealth**, composition, focus, color grading, etc. Finally,D3200High pixels can indeed be better achieved by the bull head with high resolution ability,Personally, I think Nikon out of D3200 is purely used to hit Canon face,For a long time, Nikon no matter how much meaningful work is done on the optimization and workmanship of the camera, consumers, especially entry-level consumers, can't see it,Consumers are fooled by Canon's high pixels,Resulting in a bad impression that Nikon pixels are not as good as Canon,Then Nikon held his breath and came out of the low-end d3200、High-end out of D800, Directly on the pixel to complete the explosion of Canon,This leads to D3200The market positioning is a bit sad and deformed,To be honest,D3200's focus、Light sensitivity and other body performance are really not worthy of such a high pixel,It will hurt to match this machine with a lens。

D800 doesn't complain, if you can afford such an expensive body, I can afford to buy a bull head by default).

1.Nikon's best portrait head is the best of all the houses, which is 85. Both the specifications and the quality are legendary, and the focus is extremely dreamy.

The imaging quality is unrivaled in the field of AF lenses, and the only endocal lenses that can be compared to the MF head are the Zeiss 85 and the Leica APO

90 2, so there is nothing to hesitate about.

2.The other lens is a 35, which is very sharp when fully opened, and the anamorphic control is relatively well-controlled, which is suitable for shooting half-body, full-body or environmental images.

3.If you go out for a trip, you can get an 18-105. Convenient and hassle-free. The effect is also good. Of course, there are also 18-200

It is very good to choose a large zoom lens like 18-300. The large zoom lens shoots the scenery at a wide angle and can see widely; The telephoto can shoot portraits, and there is a certain background blur effect.

4.If you have a portrait head, and you don't plan to replace it with a high-end machine, you will develop it. So.

The DX35 is a good choice. DX is Nikon's.

Lenses for APS-C format machines. It can't be used on a full set of cameras over 10,000 yuan.

in APS-C format. There will be a focal length conversion, so.

The actual effect of 35=

It's about the same as a traditional 50 prime focus. This focal length is a classic all-round focal length control, and you can shoot anything. In addition, the wide aperture is very good for portraits and low-light scenes.

5.If it is equipped with 50 fixed focus, then the equivalent focal length is 75. Maybe the framing angle is a little narrower. It will feel that the practicality is not good enough.

In terms of image quality, you are right, the photos taken are no different from those of a 7,8000 machine, and not much different from a machine of 10,000 yuan.

From the perspective of photography, there is no direct connection between good equipment and good **, and mobile phones and cards can also shoot well**.

From a good point of view, technology is needed to give full play to the performance of the equipment, art is needed to meet the aesthetic connotation, and the camera is just a tool.

In terms of the purpose of use, if it is just a home travel non-hobby photography as a card machine replacement, there is nothing wrong with 3200 plus bull heads.

With a good pen, the robot (it is called Nikon D3200) can draw very good works, right?

So people don't need to buy full-frame SLR cameras anymore? The D3200 camera belongs to the low-end entry-level camera in the SLR, don't consider buying a high-end lens (a better lens is 3-4 times the price of your camera), you can play for 2 years and sell it at half price. It's also equivalent to you gilding the bike, and it's not as fast as an electric car!