Buy Nikon D300S or D7000? Tangled

Updated on number 2024-04-08
7 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    D7000 body listed in North America**1199, about 8000, about 1000 cheaper than D300S, considering that in addition to the focusing system, other hardware indicators are not lower than D300S, I personally think it is still worth buying. However, D7000 is indeed too close to D300S, it is estimated that Nikon will soon release a follow-up model of D300S, and the follow-up model positioning will be higher than D300S, it may be close to Canon7D's top APS SLR, then**It will be higher. If you start in the near future, the D300S is also good, if you can wait for a while, just wait for the D7000** to stabilize.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    It's still D7000, and all indicators are very high.

    The D300S is a little better in terms of focus, continuous shooting speed, etc., but 12 million phase elements is a short one.

    In the end, the camera is still for taking pictures, so I think it is worth sacrificing a little body performance for better image quality, and the body performance of the D7000 can also be regarded as a flagship model.

    Hawkers, Nikon will not let D7000 eat the market of D300S, so after the launch, D7000's ** will probably not drop in the short term, but in order to compete with Canon, it will also be lower than 7D (basically the same as D300S**) by one grade.

    North America's ** is 1,200 US dollars, equivalent to 8,000 yuan, according to experience, the North American price is about the same as the mainland licensed price.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It's better to choose Nikon than to choose Canon,Personally, I feel that Canon550D is good,High pixels,Noise reduction technology and continuous shooting function are also greatly improved compared with machines of the same price,Accurate metering,Video、The camera function is very powerful。 It is a relatively high configuration in the entry-level SLR This machine is relatively sturdy and easy to carry.

    In addition, I am also quite satisfied with the ** of the Canon 550D SLR, and I have not found a more cost-effective camera with the same configuration

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Agree with the statement upstairs,Ben was the same when I bought a Nikon small machine,When I made a shot,It's one level higher than what my colleague bought three months ago.,But a year later, the machine in my hand is no longer out.,One level higher at the same time occupies the original price.,Manufacturers like this series of machines have such a habit.。 I don't know much about high-end machines, but I think such a machine still has to look at its market positioning, if possible, try it for a while, and you will have your own positioning.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    I'm also entangled in this, I want to see if the 300s are cheaper when the 7000 is listed, and if I pick up a good price for delisting, it will be 300s, otherwise I will wait for the 7000 to stabilize before buying! This small update of these machines is too fast, and it can't be counted as little Japan! Alas, that's where the tangle lies!

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    In fact, there is no need to be entangled, directly in one step, although it will cost some more money, but overall it is still cost-effective, join you now to buy D300S, nearly 9000 yuan, now D700** in 16000, just spend 7000 yuan more, in fact, save 9000 yuan, over D300S, directly get D700 full pair, as for D800, 24 million pixels, only the estimated price of a single machine will be more than 20000, 24-70 is very worth having! Mirror Emperor, you can't go wrong!

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Do you have a choice other than the Invincible Bunny? Is it all full width and d700? It's all professional, and the landlord doesn't want to do the post-production at all?

    Nikon may be able to engage in photojournalism, but if it is for photography, then Invincible Rabbit is the best choice.

Related questions
8 answers2024-04-08

Because the D7000 uses an APS sensor with an area of about 75% of the full-frame size, the physical focal length of the D7000 needs to be multiplied by the equivalent coefficient (in order to calculate the actual "equivalent focal length", 18*, when using an 18mm focal length on the D7000 body, it is equivalent to the field of view of the full-frame body 27mm focal length, so if you want to increase the field of view (increase the wide angle), it is possible to choose a lens with a focal length of less than 18mm. At present, the retail** of Nikon's original DX 10-24 lens with the smallest focal length is about 5,600 yuan. So, the goal of less than 4,000 you mentioned is impossible to achieve. >>>More

1 answers2024-04-08

Hello! When choosing a DSLR digital camera, the first thing is to choose the brand, because the brand determines the update of your accessories and lenses in the future. The brands are naturally Nikon and Canon, and other brands do not need to be considered. >>>More

8 answers2024-04-08

Nikon D3200 DSLR Camera Pros:1.**Dramatically improved pixels; >>>More

8 answers2024-04-08

If the subject moves, the camera will enable pre-tracking focus** the final distance of the subject and adjust the focus as needed. >>>More

17 answers2024-04-08

This just happens to have a Tamron VC anti-shake version, which meets your requirements, **3200 or so.