The problem of Nikon SLR, will it be cheaper to buy Nikon SLR in Thailand than domestic water?

For example, the simplest CMOS and LCD screen bad pixels, these 2 bad pixel indicators, there is no mandatory regulation in China, the outside world says that 3 points or 5 points are only based on the indicators of other countries such as Europe, and they are all negotiated, the most important thing is that these bad pixels are only limited to the LCD screen, there is no saying for the bad pixels of CMOS, but in Japan, the bad pixels of CMOS and LCD screen are all strictly explained.

Speaking of which, I understand, although as the upstairs buddy said, the important parts are indeed original, because there is no such powerful technology in China that can copycat SLR, but the raw materials of the original goods are also good and bad. So in general, parallel goods are stronger than licensed goods.

The premise of not considering the price is, of course, it is better to go to Japan to buy directly, if it is to buy parallel goods in China, then forget it, the first parallel goods do not guarantee the original, and the second you can't get the invoice, even if there is a problem, you can't go to Japan to repair.

1. Product quality problems: Generally speaking, small Japan sells the best quality products in Japan; The second category is sold in Europe and the United States; Three categories are sold in developing countries, including China.

Second, the warranty issue, the domestic Nikon only the domestic purchase of the product serial number, and must have the relevant ** issued by the machine invoice proof. In this way, you can enjoy the first year of free maintenance service. If you buy parallel goods, there is no free maintenance anyway, but if you have any problems, you can still go to a Nikon repair station for paid maintenance and testing.

Original parallel goods are generally better than licensed goods, but the important parts are original. Therefore, the difference between the water and the water can be ignored.

It is recommended that the landlord buy regular mainland licensed goods, so that it is more secure for the after-sales in the future.

This is not a coincidence,The camera** has a lot to do with the consumption level of various countries,You can look at D90**Hongzi in Thailand and then convert it to add tariffs,And then compare with the domestic**,Maybe you can buy a bargain,But warranty and other after-sales potato key matters may be troublesome.。。。

For example, Lenovo computers are made in China, but the United States is cheaper than China. And Zhuomei Photographic Equipment Network reminds you that DSLR cameras are valuables, and finally buy licensed goods in China, so that after-sales and other problems will be guaranteed, and the accessories can also be clear, so as not to be deceived abroad!

After the most pickpocketing, Zhuomei Photographic Equipment** sincerely wishes you a happy Spring Festival journey, happy spring socks and fun for the whole family, and take more good photos**!

cn Both machines are good. Their low-to-mid end is about the same. But when it comes to the high-end, it's completely different things, Canon's high-end zoom is cheaper than Nikon, and there are cost-effective F4 small ternary to choose from, Nikon's big ternary is more than 1W is very expensive.

Personally, I prefer the Canon 60D, which is cost-effective

Equally, Nikon has a generous shape, is cheaper than the Canon**, and the low-end machine lacks a fuselage autofocus motor. The Canon is delicate, and focusing at night is more troublesome. Canon has more lenses, and Nikon is cheaper. Choose according to your own requirements.

To be honest, this problem is really hard to say in the SLR world. As a good SLR, it is not only necessary to have good workmanship, but also to have a strong lens group. Who is better, each has its own characteristics.

But one thing is for sure, Nikon lenses are more expensive than Canon.

Personally, I feel that Nikon is better, because Nikon doesn't need to advertise anymore

This problem is not very good, it is good to have a long time, there are many news Nikon, the wide sports canon, the key depends on how much price you buy, and whether that price is Nikon or Canon Excellent.

There is no point in discussing which one is good, and any kind of camera can shoot good work.

Whichever one you like, you can get in.

5000 below don't think about it, of course the mid-range is d90, Yu Ye but 7000 may not be able to play, the set also wants this**, it depends on what you do, if you usually play, the set is also OK, if you want to do a little creation, you want to make a good head, ** all down is estimated to be 7000-9000, playing SLR is a bit of a money, if you match, make a tripod, add a battery, just win it, dozens of dollars, when you go out to play, there is a guarantee.

You may not be very clear about the concept of a kit, the so-called kit refers to the camera when it is sold, the body and lens are sold to you together. This situation is generally common in mid-range or low-end machines, most of the lenses of the set are not very high-grade heads, such as 18--135 or 18--105, this kind of lens ** is about 1000-2000, of course, this kind of head can cope with most shooting situations, but the effect is average, if you want a similar head, Nikkor 85mm fixed focus, the aperture, I have been using this. However, this one requires a lot of experience, and you need to move your body back and forth when framing and composing the shot.

Around 3000, the first two years ago, it may not be so much now.

I don't care about D3100, and D90 is not in the same grade.

If you choose a Canon camera, comparability and dust-based Nikon have their own advantages and disadvantages, I personally feel that Canon is a bit like a toy, if the lens does not use the red circle, it is of little significance, the lens is all plastic, if you use the red circle, ** is too expensive.

It's not really about the camera, it's about the person who uses it.

Your price point.

Let's go with D90.

What a generation of socks.

The classification of cameras is relatively obvious.

Entry-level and quasi-professional level words.

There are still differences.

A DSLR is a holistic system.

If the silver is sufficient.

Look no further than the D7000.

However, the recent price level is still a bit empty.

It is possible to wait and see. I'm on the sidelines.

The whole set of SLR refers to the set of machines.

The body plus the SLR.

Nikon's words are usually 18-55 or 18-105

The quality is ok.

Nikon's D3100 is similar to the defeat corresponding to the fact that the plus size should be.

Canon's 500D or even 550D

However, the competitiveness has yet to be proven.

However, it is still very advantageous compared to 1100d.

The 16-85 head is the best set of heads.

It's more expensive though.

And there is no absolute advantage in image quality.

It's not that the requirements are very strict.

Then choose 18-105.

Use and the picture quality is OK.

These low-to-mid-range cameras from Nikon.

It is not produced in Japan.

So don't worry too much about price increases.

It's made in Thailand.

SLR, used to record family life, fast letter dismantling!

But personally, I think that if it is really a lot of cameras, it is better to buy a D3100 set + a camera, and the total price will not exceed 7000.

After all, a camera is a camera, and it is impossible to have many functions like a video camera before the banquet, and the camera is still good for taking pictures.

The budget is 5000-7000 yuan, so you don't have to think about it, buy D3100 and then match a better lens The quality of the film is better than that of D90 with a set of camera heads, you can think like this The budget is certain The cheaper the body, the better the lens can be matched Isn't the SLR playing with the lens

Canon Hehe, you can pass the reason, you know, buy d90 with 18-105, then it doesn't make sense to be stuffy Buy 18-200 The budget must be more than 7000

Buy D3100 with a better lens or with 2 mid-grade lenses 100 times stronger than D90 with a low-end lens See the above recommended you to buy D90 are all people who want you to bury the cover and return to the month hungry d90+18-200 in the distribution of accessories No 9000 can come down and count your cattle fork d3100+18-200 with a little electric bend hungry pool Good accessories 7000 budget is easy.

Choose D90, buy within 6 months, and definitely sell now. Because the production capacity must be affected by the reach, it will be higher and higher. The whole set you're talking about is more complicated.

The current card machine at home can be satisfied, but you choose a single-lens reflex, which means that you have the highest demand for beauty, so that the whole set of costs is very big, and you can only upgrade one step at a time, and the principle is enough.

**Licensed goods must have anti-counterfeiting, I just bought one, there is anti-counterfeiting, and you can find it from**.

Nikon's four major ** in China are marked, Quantum, Lida, Kanghua, and Liangchi.

The serial number of a Nikon card machine is an 8-digit number starting with 7. There is a Chinese display on the left side of the lens. It's licensed, otherwise it's water.

Resolutely into the D7100, the picture quality is better. Overall performance and professionalism 70d defeated. As for the upstairs push full-width practice,It's completely too much to think about,First, it's difficult to get started.,Fully understand that the picture in front of the machine is not recorded.,The gains outweigh the losses.,The second is no amateur but convenient internal flash,The third price is high,The fourth performance is wasted,Who doesn't know that the 100,000 Hasselblad picture quality is better?

What about the money. , let's get started, there will be no new products in the short term, and there will be no value in waiting for no inorganic in the hand.

The D7100 is a camera that came out in 13 years, and now it is 17 years, ** it should be stable, and there is absolutely no problem with practice.

I'm also paying attention to these two cameras, and the indicators look at D7100 is better, however, Nikon D600 has a slag door, I don't know if the D7100 has the same slag as the D600, I'm very worried.

7100 is very good, if you really have the financial strength, take this. It's all about what you think is good.

That's good. The cost performance D7100 is high, mainly considering that it is only out of 70D, and there is a lot of room for price reduction.

D7100 is only an entry-level SLR, you can enter it when you play, D5300 is a scum, but let me see 7100 because it is a residual amplitude and scum, it is recommended that you have money to go directly to the full pair, then you can upgrade and change the lens in the future, and you don't need to change the machine in order to upgrade the full pair.

Novices are not recommended to enter the D7100 mid-range SLR, it is recommended to enter the Nikon Although it is an entry-level machine, its performance is almost comparable to the D7100, and the pixels are also 24 million, and the new processor used by the D5300 is a whole generation higher than the D7100, so that it will not freeze during high-speed continuous shooting (D7100 and D5200 will appear to freeze after 2 seconds of high-speed continuous shooting, but D5300 will not). Moreover, the D5300 has a rotating screen, which is convenient for shooting from all angles, especially the ultra-low camera position. The shoulder screen of the D7100 does not make sense for novices, because the data displayed on the shoulder screen is available on the main screen.