A and B borrow money from C, and B uses all the money in the end. Now B has fled and is not ready to

Hello dear, I saw that your description should be that A and B borrowed together, but in the case of B running away, Party A has the obligation to repay. Because you are borrowing together, as for who consumes it, it has nothing to do with C, and it is normal and reasonable to ask Party A for money, but it is a violation of the law to use violent threats, and Party A can call the police. It is recommended to divide the debt clearly through legal procedures, and repay as much as you should repay.

Call the police, there are two points in this, the first is to talk about violent threats and other means, no matter what this loan is, it is not available, you can call the police. Second, since it is two people who borrow money, then it means that A and B borrow money in partnership, and B runs away, and there is no problem in asking A for money.

If A only introduces B and C to each other, then A should not be liable for the repayment of the loan, and if A plays the role of a guarantee in it, then C has the right to claim the repayment of the loan from A. Of course, it is definitely illegal to use violent threats to recover the loan, and you can report it to the police.

Was the IOU made by two people at the time? If so, then there is a repayment obligation; However, C cannot use illegal means to collect debts. If this situation arises again, you can report it to the police, and it is best to reach an agreement with Party C on repayment.

In this case, it is necessary to prove that the money A has not been used, and all the money has been used by B, and he has filed a lawsuit in court.

Call the police, this kind of thing can only be solved through the first paragraph of the law.

C may report to the procuratorate the crime of embezzlement of property that has escaped with the money in file B.

Since the money was borrowed by two people, A has the obligation to repay the loan, and the question of the use of the money is a matter for A and B.

Alarm. This matter can only be dealt with by the police.

Although it is a triangular debt, it requires the consent of all three parties to transfer this debt relationship, otherwise it is useless for either party to disagree (even if it is the party who owes money, C, he can say that he only has a debt with B, and does not agree to pay back to A).

If A agrees, that's totally fine.

Otherwise, not.

This is because there is a human relationship in private lending.

Since A lent money to B, B must pay it back to A.

It can be assigned through creditor's rights.

It's okay for three people to agree by consensus......

Legal analysis: No, because there is no creditor's rights and debts relationship between C and A, but if the three parties reach an agreement and Party A agrees, C can directly claim from A.

Legal basis: Article 520 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Where some joint debtors perform or offset debts or deposit the subject matter, the debts of other debtors to creditors shall be extinguished within the corresponding scope; The debtor may recover from other debtors in accordance with the provisions of the preceding article. If the debts of some joint debtors are forgiven by creditors, the debts of the other debtors to creditors shall be extinguished within the scope of the share of the joint debtors to bear the malpractice.

If the debts of some joint debtors and the creditor's claims are attributed to the same person, the creditors' claims against the other debtors continue to exist after deducting the debtor's share. If the creditor delays the payment and receipt of some of the joint debtors, it shall take effect on the other joint debtors.

Legal analysis: This is a performance to a third party, and the third party C is not a party to the loan contract and does not have the obligation to repay the debt to A.

Legal basis: Article 675 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China The borrower shall return the loan within the agreed time limit. Where there is an agreement on whether the remaining limit of the loan period has not been destroyed or the agreement is not clear, and it is still uncertain in accordance with the provisions of Article 510 of this Law, the borrower may return it on time; The lender may urge the borrower to return the loan within a reasonable period of time.

Summary. Hello! It depends on whether A is the guarantor, or whether there is an agreement in the loan contract that A shall be jointly and severally liable for repayment when C is unable to repay the loan.

A comes forward and asks B to lend money to C, but C does not repay the money later, is A responsible?

Hello! It depends on whether A is the guarantor, or whether there is an agreement in the loan contract that A shall be jointly and severally liable for repayment when C is unable to repay the loan.

Guarantees, which are divided into general guarantees and joint and several guarantees. 1. If it is stated in the guarantee that if the borrower cannot repay and is responsible for the guarantee, then it is a general guarantee, and the law stipulates that the general guarantee is as follows, and when the borrower cannot repay it in law (after applying for enforcement, it cannot be executed), the property of the guarantor can be enforced. 2. If the guarantor does not write any of the above contents, then it is a joint and several guarantee, and the creditor can ask the borrower for money, or ask the guarantor for money.

The liability for joint and several guarantees is heavier.

If none of the above, A is not responsible.

1. If A owes money to B and B owes money to C, can C directly ask for money from A?

No, because there is no creditor-debtor relationship between C and A, but if the three parties reach an agreement and Party A agrees, C can directly claim from A.

2. Requirements for the exercise of the right of substitution:

1.It is a monetary debt, except for those that belong exclusively to the debtor itself (e.g. personal injury compensation).

2.It is B's negligence in exercising his claim against C, and C's debt to B has arrived.

3.A's authority to exercise is only:The amount of A's claim against B When respecting the amount of B's claim against C:

According to the former;The amount of A's claim against B When B's claim against C: calculated according to the former; c.

The amount of A's claim against B When B's claim against C: This amount is calculated.

4.The necessary expenses incurred by A in exercising the right of subrogation shall be borne by B.

5.A sued in the name of self-deprecation of the iodine guest Yan Jiujie and the end of the winter. Note:

Article 12 of Interpretation I of the Supreme People's Court interprets the creditor's rights that are exclusively subordinate to the debtor as the right to claim payment based on the relationship of dependency, dependence, support and inheritance, as well as the right to claim labor remuneration, retirement pension, pension payment, resettlement payment, life insurance, and personal injury compensation.