The man in the second married family owes 200,000 yuan, and she asked the woman to sell the house be

It's not a matter of character, but a feeling that it's a matter of using a woman. I think that if the relationship is really good, I should deal with the pre-marital debts by myself, instead of letting the woman sell the house to help him pay off the debts. Therefore, it is recommended that the woman should be cautious in handling the relationship between the two parties, leave a way back for herself, and do not pay too much emotional and financial expenditure.

The man in the second-married family owes 200,000 yuan to let the woman sell the premarital house, do you think there is a problem with character, there must be a problem with character, he doesn't work hard to earn money to pay off the arrears, he only thinks about his daughter-in-law's premarital property, if I am this woman, I will definitely not sell my premarital property to him to repay his debts, and such a man is not really living. There is a big problem with character.

There must be a problem! The purpose of marriage is not pure, and you are regarded as a wronged person, it seems that you need to be cautious when remarrying!

Is there a problem with his character! The house is the woman's pre-marital property! Not for sale! The money he owes has nothing to do with the woman! If it doesn't work, it's gone! What's the big deal! Sold the house to pay off his debts? It's a bun!

There must be a problem, he doesn't want to make a way to pay off other people's debts, and he must be cautious before he takes action when he hits the woman's idea of a house before marriage.

What does this have to do with character? If you don't think about the problem like this, it is obviously a purposeful behavior, so you must not listen to him and beware of this person in the future, and you can even consider leaving to avoid serious losses in the future.

You must not sell your house to pay off your debts.

The car is joint property and if there is any other agreement, it shall be agreed.

Since money is a special existence, it is a kind of thing in law, i.e., the attribute of money is possession, i.e., possession. Since it cannot be proved that the money used to buy the car is the money obtained from the auction, the money for the purchase of the car is presumed to be joint property, and the transformation of such joint property (the car purchased) is of course joint property.

However, the house before the marriage is still personal property, and even if the auction proceeds are auctioned, it is still personal property and can be claimed in the event of divorce. When dividing property, the personal property of one party shall be divided first. Here's an example:

The value of the house before the marriage is 3 million and it is assumed that the auction proceeds are still 3 million, and the total family property of the two parties at the time of divorce is 5 million in cash. 3 million should be set aside as one party's personal property first, and the value of the garage under the name should be converted separately.

Hello, the car is owned by the individual; The car was purchased with the transformation of the pre-marital property, which was essentially the pre-marital property, which was owned by the individual; Please see the following rules:

Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China.

Article 17 The following property acquired by husband and wife during the existence of their marital relationship shall be jointly owned by the husband and wife:

1) Wages and bonuses;

2) the income from production and operation;

3) income from intellectual property rights;

4) Property obtained by inheritance or donation, except as provided for in paragraph 3 of Article 18 of this Law;

5) Other property that shall be jointly owned.

Husbands and wives have equal rights to dispose of jointly owned property.

Article 18: In any of the following circumstances, it is the property of one of the husband and wife:

1) the pre-marital property of one of the parties;

2) Medical expenses, living allowances for the disabled, and other expenses received by one party as a result of bodily injury;

3) Property that is determined in the will or gift contract to belong to only one of the husband or wife;

4) Daily necessities for the exclusive use of one side;

5) Other property that shall belong to one side.

The car is the joint property of the husband and wife! How to consult a local lawyer.

Property law, new marriage law, personal property before marriage is not affected by marriage, and it does not belong to joint property after auction.

Capitation is a means of compensation for the expropriator and does not determine the division of family property. Due to the information you provided, it is not possible to determine who the owner of the original property is (the name on the deed) and cannot answer specifically. If the house certificate is in your grandmother's name, declare to the local government in advance that the payment without proof of authorization is invalid.

If it's your father's name. can be sued directly. There are many reasons for this, such as:

Unfair distribution of real estate, domestic abuse, gambling, etc. Proof, of course! If you need more details, please continue to ask questions!

Before the joint property relationship is dissolved, the co-owners cannot ask for the division of the joint property, but according to the situation you said, let your mother go to the court to sue for divorce, if you leave, you can naturally ask for the division of the property. If the title deed is in your grandfather's name, your grandmother can go to the inheritance lawsuit, and then your grandmother will get most of the property.

I think the best and most thorough way is to file a divorce lawsuit, regardless of whose name is on the title deed, and ask the court to divide the property according to the law. And, also get rid of your dad's rogue behavior after getting the money... Hope it helps you a little.

It depends on whose name the house is registered in.

The so-called public housing is a product left over from China's special system, which refers to public housing, which is relative to the private housing right of the individual, and the general individual only has the right to rent but not the ownership. Within the scope permitted by law, public housing users have the right to occupy, use, and dispose of part of the income and dispose of public housing with restrictions.

According to the different property owners, it is divided into three types:

The first is directly managed public housing, which refers to the housing that is taken over by the state, rented, acquired, newly built and expanded, most of which are directly managed by the real estate management department for rent and repair, and a small part of the housing is rent-free for the use of units.

The second type is self-managed production by units. It refers to the housing owned by units such as national ownership and collective ownership, commonly known as enterprise property.

The third type of public housing is the housing allocated or rented to the employees of the unit as the property owner. The first two are usually listed and traded, and a listing license is generally required when trading in Beijing.

It doesn't matter if you have a thousand sets of money.

There are several facts that are ignored in the question, and this question is not valid. 1.The Chinese people are still living a productive life at home, and they are not qualified to use any law if they do not put the family first and talk about it.2Home and house are corresponding, and the house that is home cannot be said separately.

The "four children" are, first of all, one-fifth of one-half of the total property.

If the mother suffers from Alzheimer's disease and is incapacitated, if one of the children is mainly responsible for providing for the mother's old age, how will the family property be legally distributed?" Then it is negotiated to tilt "one of the children" to have a larger share, and if the negotiation fails, the only way to sue can be.

The Marriage Law stipulates that the following property acquired by husband and wife during the existence of marriage shall be jointly owned by husband and wife: (1) wages and bonuses; 2) the income from production and operation; 3) income from intellectual property rights; (4) Property obtained by inheritance or donation; (5) Other property that shall be jointly owned by the husband and wife.

In any of the following circumstances, it is the property of one of the husband and wife: (1) the premarital property of one party; 2) Medical expenses, living allowances for the disabled, and other expenses received by one party as a result of bodily injury; 3) Property that is determined in the will or gift contract to belong to only one of the husband or wife; 4) Daily necessities for the exclusive use of one side; 5) Other property that shall belong to one side.

Husband and wife may agree that property acquired during the marriage and property acquired before marriage shall be separately or jointly owned or partly separately and partly jointly owned. Because such an agreement is oral, uncertain, and prone to disputes, the law stipulates that the agreement must be in writing.

If the husband and wife agree in writing or orally as to who owns the property, and there is no dispute between the parties, the divorce shall be handled in accordance with the agreement. However, the agreement to circumvent the law is invalid.

In principle, the joint property of the husband and wife shall be divided equally. According to the actual needs of production and life and the actual needs of property, the specific treatment can also be different. Items that belong to the exclusive use of the individual are generally owned by the individual.

Legal basis: Article 39 of the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China.

In the event of a divorce, the joint property of the husband and wife shall be disposed of by mutual agreement; If the agreement is not reached, the people's court shall make a judgment based on the specific circumstances of the property and the principle of taking care of the rights and interests of the children and the woman. The rights and interests enjoyed by husbands or wives in the contracting and management of family land shall be protected in accordance with law.