SARS is a perception caused by the consumption of wild animals by humans 5

Originally, it was a virus attached to wild animals, which belonged to the scope of normal viruses, mainly civet animals, such as the civet cat, which Cantonese people love to eat. Humans become infected when they eat wild animals that contain the virus, and humans do not have antibodies to the virus, just like people before the 17th century were infected with the smallpox virus, which is difficult to resist and quickly dies. Personally, I think it's highly likely.

Wild animals parasitize a lot of bacteria and viruses. After all, human beings are higher animals, and their bodies have evolved, but their essence is degenerating. Just like a fly, the living environment is so dirty, but it never gets sick, and people can never do it.

With that kind of technology, you can't have the same genes as flies. Looking back, there are usually wild animals on the table in restaurants, and now in order to make money, who cares if he has a bad conscience? Even state-protected animals such as pangolins, giant salamanders, civet cats.

and food hygiene in coastal areas. Raw seafood, raw clams are eaten like that. Don't you know how to eat like that?

Unknown.

At that time, humans caught and ate a large number of wild animals, which led to the occurrence of "SARS", so the culprit was still humans.

Health and health card, you take home the eighth grade link, then you still dare not and you can't be with you, you won't take you this year.

SARS is caused by eating civets, because civets are infected with the SARS virus on bats, so they carry the virus and are eaten by humans, causing SARS.

The coronavirus was isolated from four SARS patients in Guangdong at the beginning. The four patients had something in common, two of them had a history of exposure to civet cats and a history of eating wild animals. At the same time, the coronaviruses isolated from civet cats and patients are highly homologous, and the genetic sequences of civet SARS virus are more homologous than those of human SARS virus.

Since then, people have talked about the color change of "raccoon dog". However, wild civets do not carry the virus. According to subsequent studies, civet cats are only animal intermediate hosts of human SARS virus, although they are the direct source of human SARS virus, but they are not the root source of SARS.

Since then, it has become clear that bats are natural reservoir hosts for SARS-like coronaviruses. Since 2005, multiple research teams have discovered more and more SARS-like coronaviruses in a variety of species of sparkled bats in China and Europe.

Very likely a civet cat. But there are different versions.

Since April 2003, the epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) has broken out in Guangdong, Hong Kong, Beijing and other places in China, and spread around the world, causing nearly 800 deaths, and "SARS" has become synonymous with SARS in China.

At that time, scientists identified a strain as the culprit of the SARS virusCoronavirusand found a genetically similar virus in civet cats sold in the Guangdong livestock and poultry market, and since then,"SARS was caused by eating civet catsThis statement began to gain popularity quickly.

However, the latest research results show that after years of research, the coronavirus strain found in a population of chrysanthemum bat species in Yunnan Province has the full genome components of the SARS virus that has been transmitted to humans. In other words, the entire genome of the SARS virus that has been transmitted to humans can be found in the natural gene pool of this SARS-like coronavirus. But it is not known how the virus appeared in bats and how it was transmitted to humans.

Scientists speculate that it is likely that the bats first transmitted the virus to civet cats, and humans then contracted the SARS virus by eating civets. Therefore, the civet cat is not innocent, it is an ironclad fact that it transmits the SARS virus as an intermediate host, but the virus ** is a bat.

So,".SARS was caused by eating civet catsThis statement is still true.

The emergence of SARS is a very serious warning to mankind that in the future, new SARS-like viruses may still emerge and vigilance must be heightened. In particular, reduce the infestation of wild animals and eat less or even no wild animals.

It is caused by civet cats and is a highly contagious virus.

It was SARS that only got by eating civets.

What is the difference between network standards? Sulphur binding.

Speechless hurried time, seeking wolves.

I, I, I, I think it's a civet cat.

SARS is caused by eating civets, which are the intermediate host of the SARS virus (SARS virus).

Shi Zhengli's research team at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, isolated a SARS-like CoV strain that is highly homologous to the SARS virus, further confirming that the Chinese chrysanthemum-headed bat is the source of the SARS virus. However, available epidemiological evidence and bioinformatics analysis suggest that civet cats in wildlife markets are a direct result of SARS-CoV.

After careful study, it was found that the civet cats in northern China did not carry the SARS-like coronavirus (SARS-CoV), only in Guangdong, where the civets carried the virus that winter. This suggests that the civet cat may have only been an intermediate host of the virus, and that it may have been infected by the Chinese chrysanthemum bat, from which it acquired the virus.

It was not caused by human consumption of wild animals, but by the spread of a large number of SARS-related coronaviruses in Chinese chrysanthemum bats, suggesting that the deadly strain may have originated in these bats and then spread to humans through civet cats.

Bats are also natural hosts for many viruses, including Ebola, Marburg, rabies, Hendra, Nipah and others. Due to the special immune system of bats, carrying viruses rarely causes illness. Over the course of evolution, bats have become natural hosts for hundreds of viruses.

Scientists detected bats of different families for antibody and nucleic acid monitoring, and the target gradually became clear, and finally found a coronavirus similar to the SARS virus in the chrysanthemum bat.

1. Humans eat wild animals and eat their own evil fruits.

2. The deterioration of the environment has led to the frequent occurrence of viruses and epidemics.

3. People should increase their efforts to defend against animal infectious agents, such as pigs and chickens, ......～4.The hunting and trafficking of wild animals should be stopped by law, as this practice not only harms the ecology, but also transmits diseases.

5.It is necessary to change people's consciousness and ...... through propaganda and other meansCultivate awareness of not eating wild animals.

1. Humans eat wild animals and eat their own evil fruits.

2. The deterioration of the environment has led to the frequent occurrence of viruses and epidemics.

As long as everyone loves the wildlife, it's okay.

The style is not legal part-time shares.

Yes. Because no matter what those wild animals are, they will have some germs at some point. What's more, people can also get sick because of excessive consumption of different wild animals.

Fang offers a better style after the unification of your sister.

We can't kill small animals indiscriminately.

Yes, many viruses only exist in certain organisms, human hunting, virus contact with people, human beings have no resistance to these viruses, resulting in the spread of the virus.

Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Atypical pneumonia is pneumonia caused by mycoplasma, chlamydia, legionella, rickettsia, adenovirus, and other unknown microorganisms. Whereas, classic pneumonia refers to lobar pneumonia or bronchopneumonia, which is caused by common bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Not necessarily, some of them are our own, and besides, humans won't be infected if they don't hunt and kill.

Yes, because there are still people in Guangzhou who eat monkey brains.

I took the animals and said, "What is my business, who told you to eat my kind!!