Is it better to have a high or low Harvest Fund number?

**With**, history can only be used as a teaching reference, the focus is still the future, because you are investing in the future, can not be used to measure the future results, so when you are making a choice, you should choose the right company, **manager, not just which**variety.

First of all, you have to consider your risk tolerance, which one you belong to, high, medium, or low, this determines the type you choose, rather than the question of the back-end charge or the front-end charge, there are several types, such as: index, **, hybrid, bond, currency, these risks are different from high to low, of course, the returns are also different, like the first three, and ** has an absolute relationship with **, **up, **up, vice versa; However, the latter two are not affected by **, but the income is not high, and they belong to the capital preservation and appreciation type, which is suitable for conservative people to invest. The first three** belong to activist investors and are riskier.

Second, after the selection of the type of company, you need to choose a company with a larger scale, the company has enough funds, relatively safe, and moreover, when making investments, you don't have to be afraid of the redemption pressure of the people. And then according to the previous **manager**income**, to determine the candidate of the **manager, because ** are operated by him, his decision directly affects the income, find out the top ** in the early stage**, find out which **manager is operating, you can find a better **manager, reduce the risk.

Third, according to the above two items, you can find a more meaningful **variety, but there is another point, if you participate in the first three categories**, the time point of one-time investment is very critical, it is related to the final income of **, buy ** at the low point, redeem at the high point, it does not necessarily take 3-5 years, it may be a year, it may be 7 years, mainly depends on the **. If it is the latter two, it doesn't matter, and it doesn't have much to do with it.

I hope the above reply will be helpful to you, and I wish you a smooth investment, a million profits, hehe.

Summary. Hello, glad to answer for you! <>

The answer to the question of what the net worth of Harvest ** means is as follows: The net worth of relatives is simply the net asset value of each ** unit. We can understand that the concept of net worth is **of**, **the latest unit net value of the public, you can think that the "**" of ** is the yuan.

The net value is the ** unit net value, and its calculation formula is: ** unit net value = total net assets **share. For example, if the net value of the unit is yuan, and we hold 100 shares of this, then our total net worth is yuan.

Conversely, if the net value of the unit is RMB, it shows that our total net worth is $200, then the share we hold is 200 shares.

What does the net worth of Harvest ** mean.

Hello, glad to answer for you! <>

The answer to the question of what the net worth of Harvest ** means is as follows: The net worth of relatives is simply the net asset value of each ** unit. We can understand that the concept of net worth is **of**, **the latest unit net value of the public, you can think that the "**" of ** is the yuan.

The net value is the ** unit net value, and its calculation formula is: ** unit net value = total net assets **share. For example, if the net value of the unit is yuan, and we hold 100 shares of this, then our total net worth is yuan.

Conversely, if the net value of the unit is RMB, it shows that our total net worth is $200, then the share we hold is 200 shares.

**, in a broad sense, refers to a certain amount of money that is set up for a certain purpose. It mainly includes trust investment, provident fund, insurance, retirement, and various wills. From an accounting perspective, ** is a narrow concept that refers to funds with a specific purpose and use.

We refer to **investment** mainly.

Of all the ** managed by Harvest Corporation, Harvest Hang Seng China Enterprise (160717) has the lowest net worth. The top five others with the lowest net worth of **, hybrid, and bond** are ranked as follows, and the data extraction date is May 12, 2021.

<> data collation comes from Tiantian**.com.

Founded in March 1999, Harvest is one of the first 10 management companies in China, and was selected as the first batch of investment managers in China at the end of 2002. In June 2005, Deutsche Asset Management took a stake in Harvest, making Harvest one of the largest joint ventures in China. In August 2005, Harvest was selected as one of the first batch of enterprise annuity investment managers.

Harvest** has a total of 28 open** and 2 closed**, all of which have good returns. They are:

070001) Harvest growth earnings;

070002) Harvest Wealth Management's growth;

070003) Harvest Financial is sound;

070005) Harvest Wealth Management Bonds;

070006) Harvest services value-added industry;

070008) Harvest Currency;

070009) Harvest ultra-short bonds;

070010) Harvest Theme Selection;

070011) Harvest's strategic growth;

070012) Harvest Overseas China;

070013) Harvest Research Selection;

070015) Harvest Multi Bondsa ;

070016) Harvest Multi-Bond B;

070017) Harvest Quant Alpha;

070018) Harvest Returns;

070019) Harvest Value Advantage;

070020) Harvest Solid Bonds;

070021) New momentum for the Harvest theme;

070022) Harvest leads the growth;

070023) Harvest SZSE 120 Connection;

070025) Harvest Credit Bondsa;

070026) Harvest Credit Bondsc;

070027) Harvest Cycle Optimization;

070028) Harvest Secure Money Marketa;

070029) Harvest Secure Money Marketb;

070099) Harvest Quality Enterprise;

160717) Harvest Hang Seng China;

160719) Harvest Investment.

500002) **Taihe;

184721) **Toyowa.

There's the Harvest theme that's been doing well lately, and there's the good Harvest Growth and Index Harvest 300

The Harvest theme was last month's earnings champion, and the Harvest 300 is also a good index**.

CSI 300-160706 Harvest Return Blend-070018

In general, it is better to match the company's **, because the ** of the same company can generally be converted to each other, which is convenient for self-management, but there are two situations:

1. Harvest CSI 300LOF is a LOF**, LOF** cannot be converted with other LOF**, so there is no problem of convenient management;

2. Harvest's two bonds** have a high risk evaluation and their performance is not very good, so there is no need to consider them.

I think you can consider ChinaAMC Bonds, which is a bond that mainly invests in bonds** (note that it is ChinaAMC Bonds, not ChinaAMC Hope Bonds, the latter can be invested**, which is riskier, and then it is meaningless to match with a high-risk index ** such as Harvest CSI 300LOF), and you have to decide which fee method to choose based on your investment horizon. There are three types of charges for ChinaAMC bonds, class A is the front-end fee, class B is the latter's stuffy fee, and class C is the horizontal charge, I personally recommend that the short-term allocation within two years choose ChinaAMC bond C, and the long-term allocation of more than 5 years choose ChinaAMC bond B, and the two can be traded.