What do you think would happen if the world was polyandry?

Updated on society 2024-04-22
42 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    If the world were to practice polyandry, I think it would be chaotic. Relationship is a thing that requires a lot of time and energy to maintain, and it is impossible to take care of anything else when it comes to a relationship. If it's polyandry, I think the wife will be more tired.

    Because all the time and effort needs to be paid many times. And it will be more and more regressive, and it will return to the state of a matriarchal clan, which is definitely not okay. The world is moving forward, so polyandry is not okay.

    Another reason is the problem of family relationships, which can be complicated by polyandry. Marriage is originally a matter of two families, and it is definitely not a matter of two people. Therefore, if it is polyandry, then the family relationship will become extremely complicated.

    Originally, the relationship between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law has been difficult to deal with since ancient times, and if there are many complicated family relationships, life between husband and wife will definitely not be good. It's also very hurtful to quarrel every day over trivial matters. <>

    In addition to this, polyandry is not suitable for the development of modern society. Just like polygamy, sooner or later it will be eliminated. There will certainly be people who say that this phenomenon exists in some other countries, but it is also a very small number of countries and localities.

    And it can be seen that the living environment and conditions of ** are very bad, a bit primitive and ancient. If this is the case, then it will definitely disrupt the development of today's society. There is nothing good about such a system.

    To sum up, if the world implements polyandry, it will definitely not work, and everyone will not support it. We live in the world, it is enough to meet someone who truly loves us or wants to love, and it is not easy for a couple to support each other until they grow old. Not to mention polyandry, it is better to be realistic and not to add so many burdens to yourself and your family in vain.

    I don't think it's just me, I'm sure a lot of people like I think, they wouldn't want polyandry to develop.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    I think this world will become the palace fighting drama of the past, thinking about how to compete for favor and how to win the favor of his wife every day.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    If polyandry is implemented in this world, I think the world will be chaotic, after all, many people's view of marriage has begun to change, and they can do something unscrupulous that is not illegal.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Then the world will just become more turbulent, first of all, there will be a lot of strife within the family, even family tragedy, and it will also make the society lose its moral standards.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    I think the world is going to be chaotic, because a lot of men want to think for themselves, so it's especially difficult for women.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The woman has to work hard, she has to deal with such a man every day, and the pressure of having a child increases, which will strain the woman's body.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Once polyandry comes along, life will become especially chaotic, which is simply crazy. Society will also be affected as a result, and normal life will no longer exist.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Life will be chaotic, at that time the feelings are no longer pure in people's hearts, and they don't know who is the biological father of the child, and there may be conflicts between husbands and husbands.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    If polyandry is introduced, then life will become more chaotic. Because the child has no idea who his father is.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Polyandry life will be chaotic, chaotic, polygamy is also chaotic, the most suitable monogamy is legal, older leftover women are more single aristocrats than older leftover men, more women and fewer men are unbalanced, if men and women balance marriage, there should be no problem.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Life will be very chaotic because everyone's father will become very mysterious, and there may be multiple fathers at the same time.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    In fact, this is a very unreasonable thing in today's society, and there will be more single people in life.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    It's a little bit of appearance, and now I can't accept it, and this topic is not so hot after ten or eight years, but it's dull, and after many years, if ** is allowed, people will slowly accept it in their hearts, and time will slowly come down, and there is nothing that can't be accepted.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    If there is a natural law of polyandry and polygamy, as long as it is done naturally, it is also a harmonious republican society, but it is difficult at the beginning of everything, development, openness, redevelopment, re-opening, protection of social coexistence, "harmonious society".

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    If there are more husbands, women will definitely not work anymore, hello today and tonight will be yours, and tomorrow he will be him again, anyway, who is good with whom, there is a decisive personal dominance, so that men will fight, spoil, hold, coax.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    At present, polyandry in China is not feasible, if you want to change the status quo, the only thing is to have more girls, the state must have good policies to encourage, such as how much money is rewarded for giving birth to a girl, etc., and in another 20 years, the ratio of men and women will be unbalanced.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Not to say polygamy, that is, to say monogamy now. It's all bad, or all those women will turn into panda eyes. Instead, it is women who suffer.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    If it appears, first of all, I don't know if it's chaotic, but the interest rate on twins and multiple births will be much higher, and the population will suddenly skyrocket, which will have a certain impact on the development of the country, but fortunately this is only if.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    This is the retreat of social civilization, I can't think about it, polygamy at least knows who its parents are, and polyandry doesn't know who his father is when he arrives, and even messes up ethics, and father and son may also share a wife

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    This problem is easy to solve.

    Whoever makes and agrees with this suggestion first asks his wife if he agrees to marry a man who is not the same, and if his wife agrees and is willing to marry 10 different men separately, and only spends one night with him after 20 years, depending on what he thinks, first ask the person who made this suggestion, there should be nothing wrong with this way.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    Polyandry is not as good as abolishing marriage, free exchange, free love, and free love to each according to his love. There are so many troubles. There are some nonsensical things mentioned above, these people don't think about these messy things when they are idle for a day.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Polyandry will make more and more leftover women, and now there are many leftover women in the city, and there are 800,000 more leftover women than leftover men in Beijing alone.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    Summary. "Polyandry" is a form of marriage that exists in matrilineal clan societies, and ethnic groups such as Tibetans and Monba still retain this form of marriage.

    What happens if polyandry is practised?

    "Polyandry" is a form of marriage that exists in matrilineal clan societies, and ethnic groups such as Tibetans and Monba still retain this form of marriage.

    Since ancient times, human society has been dominated by men, and polyandry has completely subverted this social rule, making women the masters of society and the family, bearing more responsibilities and obligations.

    Different ages have different opinions about polyandry, if you don't completely emancipate women in terms of thoughts and concepts, it is useless to give more men, and there are too many men who can't make women feel happy. Married women have taken on too many social roles, and the freedom and freedom of their youth are all consumed by firewood, rice, oil and salt.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    Personally, I think it's hard to achieve. First of all, polyandry involves traditional ethical and moral issues, as we all know, for thousands of years, China is a patriarchal society with a strict hierarchical concept, men occupy a dominant position in social life, dominate the affairs of society, even in New China, such facts and concepts have not been absolutely fundamentally changed, polyandry is undoubtedly subversive, contrary to our deep-rooted traditional concepts; Secondly, as far as I know, similar phenomena are rare in both human society and the biological world, and it is also contrary to the laws of nature in terms of the continuation of the race after reproduction. Third, as far as I know, China's current male-to-female ratio is 105:100, which is far from that serious, and the imbalance between men and women is a demographic problem, and various measures have been taken to adjust the balance between men and women, such as prohibiting the sex identification of fetuses, and promoting the concept of "daughters are also descendants" in rural areas, and initial results have been achieved.

    Therefore, it is difficult to survive in polyandry. If you look at everyone's reactions, you will know how many people will oppose, blame and even abuse such a proposal when it is launched. Besides, would you agree?

    Hehe harmonious society, I think harmony is embodied in all aspects, harmony and rationality and science should be the main theme of the development of human society, is the only correct and in line with the laws of natural development direction. Humanity is progressing, or never giving up its efforts to find progress. Huh, agreed?

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    I think this question can be studied for the sake of social harmony. Otherwise, what should I do?

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    Polygamy is not possible in China, and according to the relevant provisions of the Marriage Law, monogamy advocated by the state constitutes the crime of bigamy. Moreover, monogamy is also a need to adapt to the development of social civilization. Article 2 The institution of marriage.

    Freedom of marriage, monogamy, and equality between men and women are practiced. Protect the legitimate rights and interests of women, children and the elderly. Family planning is practiced.

    Article 10 Marriage is null and void.

    In any of the following circumstances, the marriage is null and void: (1) bigamy; (2) There is a family relationship that prohibits marriage; (3) Suffering from a disease that is medically deemed unsuitable for marriage before marriage, and has not yet been married after marriage; (4) They have not reached the legal age for marriage.

    Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China

    Article 258:The crime of bigamy.

    1. Monogamy can better force people to cultivate offspring, monogamy is not only in line with the physiological characteristics of human beings, but also in line with the social characteristics of human beings, and the energy of two people is invested in future generations at the same time, which is beneficial to the growth and education of future generations.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    No, first of all, China's current basic national conditions do not allow it, although it has always been advocated that equality between men and women is still in the majority, but in general, men still occupy the dominant position, and China's historical and cultural background also proves that polyandry is impossible.

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    Legislatively impossible in the foreseeable future. Of course, sometimes it has nothing to do with the law. The true colors of the hero.

  29. Anonymous users2024-01-11

    Some countries have already implemented it, and if you have a limited lifespan, the best thing to do is to hurry up and emigrate.

  30. Anonymous users2024-01-10

    Khan Rest early in the evening and make it come true in your dreams

  31. Anonymous users2024-01-09

    I think China will be in a chaotic situation, and there will be many problems with the social order, which will affect family harmony, and it will also lead to problems in people's feelings.

  32. Anonymous users2024-01-08

    China will be in a serious situation of economic regression, because most of the money earned is for men, polyandry, men will lose their fighting spirit, and a serious situation will be formed!

  33. Anonymous users2024-01-07

    If China has polyandry, then the current China should be like the ancient palace fighting drama, which will be constantly staged every day to compete for favor.

  34. Anonymous users2024-01-06

    If it is really implemented, men will fight openly and secretly, women will not be at peace, the next generation will not grow up healthy and normal, and the entire social civilization will regress in a straight line! Maybe even a return to the original mode! Even more serious is an existential crisis!!

  35. Anonymous users2024-01-05

    This problem is not a problem, knowing why you don't get married now, why you don't have so many children, the problem will be solved, I think, I can't afford to be sick, I can't afford to buy, I can't afford to get married! It's the problem of not having children now.

  36. Anonymous users2024-01-04

    At that time, China must have been in a very turbulent situation, because there were many men competing for women, and there were many wars.

  37. Anonymous users2024-01-03

    There will be more and more single people, and the sharp increase in life pressure has made young people no longer care about marriage or not. Come once when you need it, and do everything your own way. Only you leg-backers of the era with broken arms and legs are still discussing such boring questions!

    It's sad that his head is so backward, and he still proposes policies for the country.

  38. Anonymous users2024-01-02

    I don't take a woman with a man, I'd rather be single, my wife has to dare to hook up, lock up in the room and beat her, refuse to accept the divorce, get out of here!

  39. Anonymous users2024-01-01

    There is nothing wrong with mutual voluntariness, people's receptivity is different, there are those who can do and those who can't, and they are not forced, they live their own lives well, what is there, take care of other people's lives, ** other people's life thinking, just don't break the law.

  40. Anonymous users2023-12-31

    In the end, it was found that most of them are still monogamous, but the overall divorce rate of society will further increase, the flow of nightclubs will further increase, and the quality of family harmony will further decrease. On the Internet, the opposing views of boys and girls will be further heated and opposed.

    The productivity of the lower strata of society may decrease slightly, the crime rate of society may rise, and there will be more and more doubts about the continuation of national culture.

  41. Anonymous users2023-12-30

    One: self-improvement + improvement of fertility. Two: All scumbags will rise. Third, the Chinese nation will automatically open the first generation of agricultural and industrial machinery joint alliance in all urban and rural areas. Four: Too much ......I'm sleepy and snoring.

  42. Anonymous users2023-12-29

    There is a premise for achieving polyandry, that is, the woman is responsible for earning money, the problem is that the woman thinks that a husband is responsible for housework, a husband is responsible for earning money to support her, ......and so onIs polyandry possible in this case? Since a man is responsible for earning money to support women, isn't it fragrant for him to spend money to find a lot of women?

Related questions
11 answers2024-04-22

Lions, orangutans, monkeys, etc. are the leaders who dominate all females. Of course, there are also monogamous ones like Minadordife the beetle.

6 answers2024-04-22

Yi Zhongtian's speech: monogamy and polygamy in ancient times.

18 answers2024-04-22

In recent years, there has been a "single tide" in China, according to relevant statistics, the domestic single population of school age has reached more than 200 million, of which the proportion of men is large. This means that a large number of "singles" have now been produced in China. Among them, some people can get married but don't want to get married, while some people want to get married but can't find a marriage partner. >>>More

18 answers2024-04-22

Monogamy, then concubines, maidservants, and whatever, but there must always be a main room, it will not be two main rooms equal, a backward marriage system, the main room will be jealous, and even hate their husbands, why is the husband like this. Does he even have to share his lover with many women, her husband falls in love, she likes many women in the family, she has to endure it, and she can't have any family conflicts, otherwise the woman is destroying the family peace, which is a manifestation of progress, love is possessive, and you don't want the other half to be good to others gradually. Then gradually ignore you, ignore you, be indifferent to you, and even be indifferent, and finally get along with others, she is a kind of possessive, once you are intimate with others, you will definitely be jealous. Sad.

17 answers2024-04-22

As we all know, in ancient times, it was a matriarchal society at the beginning, and the women in the family were engaged in picking and giving birth to children, and were the head of the family, and had absolute authority in a family or even a tribe. At that time, women were polyandry. Therefore, at that time, the child knew only his mother, but not his father, so the child took the mother's surname. >>>More