-
I'm really sorry, I don't understand how you can fall to your death while driving?
Was it a fall on a motorcycle?
If it is an accidental death, then you still have to pay money, including funeral expenses, as well as compensation to the family of the deceased.
It depends on whether the family of the deceased will sue you and convict you, but as long as the act is not intentional, it will not be too serious, and even if you will go to jail, it will not be long.
It is recommended that you find a lawyer for good consultation, after all, the online can only be used as a reference.
-
The worst is just shooting.
-
Quite severe. If there is no escape, compensation is in place, and the sentence is generally 4 to 5 years' imprisonment. If there is an escape, and death is caused by the escape. Between 7 years and less than 15 years.
-
Driving under the influence of alcohol is a violation of the Traffic and Transportation Safety Code, so your behavior is already illegal, and falling someone to death is aggravating the circumstances.
You have to bear both criminal and civil liabilities, and in civil terms, you have to compensate the family of the deceased according to local standards, mainly including: death compensation, funeral expenses, and child support. In terms of criminal matters, it will be sentenced, but it depends on whether the case is filed or not, because there are cases where people are killed in traffic accidents and are not sentenced to prison.
Surrender is one of the mitigating episodes.
It is recommended to hire a lawyer, and the brother should first negotiate with the family of the deceased, and the attitude is better. The traffic police force is also active. It's best to avoid jail time. Learn...
-
Xiaofu who is still on the way.
What should I pay attention to?
-
Summary. Hello <>
Driving under the influence of alcohol is an offence, and riding a racing car under the influence of alcohol is also an act of dangerous driving. If a person is involved in an accident while riding a race car while intoxicated and hits a roadblock and causes himself to fall to his or her death, that person is usually found to be somewhat responsible. <>
Riding a car after drinking is considered a drunk driver who crashed into a roadblock and fell to his death, is the person responsible?
Hello <>
Driving under the influence of alcohol is an offence, and riding a racing car under the influence of alcohol is also an act of dangerous air driving. If a person is involved in an accident while riding a race car while intoxicated, hitting a dust-fighting roadblock and causing himself to fall to his death, that person is usually found to be at some responsibility. <>
Hello. The following are the relevant laws and regulations: The Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates criminal liability for acts such as drunk driving, dangerous driving and traffic accidents, including the relevant statutory penalties and sentencing guidelines.
The Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates the basic rules and traffic safety requirements for driving motor vehicles, including the definition and punishment of illegal acts such as drunk driving and dangerous driving. The Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates the trial procedures and the determination of evidence in criminal cases, including the trial procedures and evidence provisions for traffic accident cases.
Is the person who erected the barricade responsible? A telephone pole was in the middle of the road, and there was a piece of riding a fictitious car that could pass, and he was unconscious after drinking, and fell to his death, and he didn't report the case at the time, can he be prosecuted.
If a person places a telephone pole in the middle of the road, and the pole poses a danger within the scope of the sliding rule, and the danger is foreseeable, then the person who placed the pole may be liable for a certain amount of responsibility.
In the case you describe, if the pole is closed in the middle of the road, but there is enough space for a bicycle to pass, and the situation is reasonably foreseeable, the person who erected the barricade may not be directly liable. In this case, a person who is drunk and rides a bicycle in front of a sedan falls to death due to a state of intoxication that causes him or her to die, and generally speaking, the blame for the main disturbance may be attributed to the person who is drunk and cyclical.
-
Summary. The items of compensation include funeral expenses, living expenses of dependents, death compensation, etc.
Hello, I am a cooperative teacher who asks for a professional first-level consultation, good at life law, and has been engaged in the industry for 5 years now, and I am happy to serve you. Whoever drives a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, causes a traffic accident that causes the death of one or more persons or serious injury to three or more persons, and bears full or primary responsibility for the accident, shall be convicted and punished as the crime of causing a traffic accident.
The items of compensation include funeral expenses, living expenses of dependents, death compensation, etc.
Where the victim dies, the person obligated to compensate shall compensate the relevant expenses provided for in the first paragraph of this article in addition to the relevant expenses provided for in the first paragraph of this article based on the circumstances of the rescue, and shall also compensate for the funeral expenses, living expenses of the dependents, death compensation, and other reasonable expenses incurred by the victim's relatives in handling funeral matters, such as transportation expenses, accommodation expenses, and loss of work.
-
If the death of a passer-by is caused by no liability, full compensation shall be made within the unconditional limit, and compensation shall be paid according to the proportion of liability beyond the unconditional limit.
The unconditional limit is generally 10% of the total amount of compensation.
1. No-fault liability is a statutory liability. General Principles of the Civil Law of our country.
Article 123 stipulates that a person who engages in high-speed transport and causes damage to others shall bear civil liability.
This is commonly referred to as no-fault liability. China's "Measures for Handling Road Traffic Accidents.
Article 44 states: "Motor vehicles and non-motor vehicles.
If a pedestrian has a traffic accident and causes the death or serious injury of the other party, and the motor vehicle party is not at fault, it shall share 10% of the economic losses of the other party. If the amount of compensation exceeds the average living expenses of the 10-month area where the traffic accident occurred, the compensation shall be paid according to the average living expenses of the 10-month period.
Second, in actual life, many accidents with non-motor vehicles and pedestrians in the insured vehicle are not responsible for the insured vehicle, and the insured vehicle only bears 10% of the compensation liability according to the regulations, but this is not the case. The insurance company is not liable for compensation other than 10% of the compensation that should not be borne by the car owner, but the car owner has indeed paid this part of the compensation, and the insurance company should consider including this part of the liability in the insurance coverage, so as to effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of the insured.
-
Summary. Forced to persuade a person to drink. Forcing the other party to drink alcohol by deliberately pouring alcohol, verbally persuading the other party to drink, etc., and persuading the other party to drink alcohol even though the other party is already drunk or against his will, such a person shall bear corresponding legal responsibility for any consequences that occur to the person who is persuaded to drink; A person who advises the other party to drink alcohol even though he knows that he or she cannot drink alcohol or that drinking alcohol may cause harm to the other party's body shall be held legally liable for the illness caused by the other party's drinking and the harm caused by the drinking; If a person who fails to escort a drunk person safely after drinking together, if the drinker has lost or is about to lose control over himself, and is delirious and unable to control his own behavior, the drinker does not send him to the hospital or safely send him home, so the joint drinker who has an accident shall bear the corresponding legal responsibility.
Hello dear, happy to answer your <>
Whether the liability for falling to death on the way home after drinking needs to bear legal responsibility depends on the circumstances, and if the party is not at fault for drinking with others, the party is not liable for the death of the person who drank with the previous defense. However, if the party has forced the other party to drink and causes the death of the other party, he shall bear civil liability for compensation.
Usually, there is no criminal liability involved, and there will be no jail time, but it is necessary to accompany the bridge to bear the civil liability of Lu Slippery. The person who drank together died, and the person who drank together should be jointly and severally liable, and let Chun see if there was any fault. If there is fault, you need to be jointly and severally liable, and if there is no fault, you are not liable.
The hermit who is forced to persuade him to drink. Forcing the other party to drink Yunqin wine by deliberately pouring alcohol, verbally persuading the other party to drink, etc., and persuading the other party to drink alcohol even when the other party is already drunk or against his will, such a person shall bear corresponding legal responsibility for any consequences that occur to the person who is persuaded to drink; A person who advises the other party to drink alcohol even though he knows that he or she cannot drink alcohol or that drinking alcohol may cause harm to the other party's body shall be held legally liable for the illness caused by the other party's drinking and the harm caused by the drinking; If a person who has lost or is about to lose control over himself or is delirious and unable to control his or her own behavior, and the drinker does not send him to the hospital or safely returned home, the co-drinker who has an accident due to the stove disturbing the accident shall bear the corresponding legal responsibility.
If the person at the same table does not take the persuasion to drink, there will be a little responsibility, but it is not what the Lord Bu Ludong wants, after all, if he falls to death on the way back after drinking, he has already gone back, and he has gone out again, so the responsibility is not great, and he only needs to negotiate with the other party's family to give a part of the civil compensation.
Dear, if you don't know anything, you can consult me at any time, as long as you need it, I am always there
-
Summary. Hello dear, drinking together, even if there is no persuasion in the middle, there is an obligation to send them home safely after drinking. Therefore, if the person concerned dies in a traffic accident when he returns home after drinking, the person who drinks with him needs to bear certain responsibility.
If the party dies while drinking and driving, the person who drank with the party does not bear the responsibility for the accident, but considering the civil part, if the lawsuit is brought to the court, if the drinker at the same table does not fulfill the relevant safety obligations, such as persuading the other party not to drink and drive, failing to safely deliver the other party home, etc., he should bear part of the economic compensation, but not too much. In the event of a traffic accident that causes personal injury to others, compensation shall be made for reasonable expenses such as medical expenses, nursing expenses, and transportation expenses, as well as the loss of income due to lost work. If the disability is caused, compensation shall also be made for the cost of disability living aids and disability compensation.
Dear, you shout hello in front of you, drink together, even if there is no persuasion in the middle, you have the obligation to send it home safely after drinking. Therefore, if the person concerned dies in a traffic accident when he returns home after drinking, the person who drinks with him needs to bear certain responsibility. However, considering the civil part, if the lawsuit is brought to the court, if the drinker at the same table does not fulfill the relevant safety obligations, such as persuading the other party not to drink and drive, failing to safely deliver the other party home, etc., he should bear part of the economic compensation, but not too much.
In the event of a traffic accident that causes personal injury to others, compensation shall be made for reasonable expenses such as medical expenses, nursing expenses, and transportation expenses, as well as the loss of income due to lost work. If the disability is caused, the grandson shall be compensated for the cost of disability living aids and disability compensation.
Basis for the law of legal probation: Article 1165 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China provides that if the actor infringes on the civil rights and interests of others due to negligence or erection, he shall bear tort liability. Where it is presumed that the perpetrator is at fault in accordance with the provisions of law, and he cannot prove that he is not at fault, he shall bear tort liability as an accompaniment.
Drunk driving precautions are as follows:
1. Extensive publicity and education to build the first line of defense >>>More
1. "Does his family (brothers and sisters, all of whom have separated) need to bear legal responsibility?" ”: >>>More
If a drunk driver escapes in a traffic accident, if no serious consequences are caused, it is sufficient to compensate the victim for his losses in accordance with the law, and he does not need to bear criminal responsibility. >>>More
What you said is too general, is it a determination of legal responsibility? >>>More
According to the regulations, if the driver's license is revoked for drunk driving during the probationary period, you cannot retake the driver's license within five years, in other words, you must pass five years before you can retake the driver's license.